The WTF Starts Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter Test User
  • Start date Start date
Frank wrote:
> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>> religious cults.
>>>>
>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free software
>>> movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a lot of
>>> communist use linux). I don't know if being an atheist/communist is
>>> some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux candidate, but the
>>> philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>>
>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>

> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
> software ideology rather nicely.
> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
> atheist or communist do you?
> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are correct
> in our assessment.
> Frank


Geez, Frank. Have you no shame? Of all the people you could identify
with and you choose him? ;)

--
norm
 
Frank wrote:
> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>> religious cults.
>>>>
>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free software
>>> movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a lot of
>>> communist use linux). I don't know if being an atheist/communist is
>>> some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux candidate, but the
>>> philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>>
>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>

> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
> software ideology rather nicely.
> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
> atheist or communist do you?
> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are correct
> in our assessment.
> Frank


I vote democratic and don't believe in a god. I do believe in cause and
effect. Do you?

Alias
 
Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Gary wrote:
>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and over
>>>>> 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False and false.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last 10
>>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an arm
>>>> and a leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better and free.
>>>> Too bad, baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who does
>>> real work.
>>>

>>
>>
>> Truer words were never spoken! :-)
>> Frank

>
>
> Course neither of you dare to say what "real work" is and can only
> snootily sneer at Open Source. Jealousy usually works that way.
>
> Alias


There is a reality that you linux lovers are simply not willing or are
unable to accept and that is that linux is not a main stream business os
capable of running most "real world" productive software. And please,
don't tell me about wine or emulators. We've been thru diatribe with you
guys many times before and nothing, absolutely nothing, has changed. You
still can't run most major software applications on linux...period! The
software applications most business need and use on a daily basis will
not run on linux. Linux has some applications that are "almost" similar,
but "almost" won't cut it in the "real" business world.
Sorry!
You may think in your mind that is will but in the "real" world (a place
you don't seem to be a part of) it really doesn't run the type of
software most (90+ %) of all business need to run in order to be productive.

Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel good
because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know it doesn't.
Frank
 
norm wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>
>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>

>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>> software ideology rather nicely.
>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>> atheist or communist do you?
>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>> correct in our assessment.
>> Frank

>
>
> Geez, Frank. Have you no shame? Of all the people you could identify
> with and you choose him? ;)
>


Geez, norm, I'm only agreeing with his assessment.
Which is so far correct.
Is that a problem?
Frank
 
Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>
>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>

>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>> software ideology rather nicely.
>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>> atheist or communist do you?
>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>> correct in our assessment.
>> Frank

>
>
> I vote democratic and don't believe in a god. I do believe in cause and
> effect. Do you?
>
> Alias


heheh...sure and which party in spain do you align yourself with?
Frank
 

>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> I've been working with computer system long before you knew what a
>> computer was.

>
> Really? The first time I operated a computer was in 1968. Remember punch
> cards?


Yes I was working on HP 3000, Data General 1200, and Univac 1108 systems
with punch card readers.
Also desiging hardware and software during that time.


>
>> I've been playing with different versions of Linux and Ubuntu since it
>> first came out.
>> Its still a toy for a desktop OS always has been always will be.

>
> What can Windows do that Ubuntu can't do besides accuse you of piracy,
> play games requiring DX and attract viruses and malware?


Interoperate with businesss software packages and do real work

>
>> There has been no significant changes in years and you know it.

>
> I've seen a significant change from Ubuntu 6.06 to 7.04.
>


And no real change in the number of users. Several companys have offered
systems with Linux and dropped it because nobody wanted it.

>> Insert your FUD here.

>
> YOU insert it. Yuck!
>


Ya right. Grow up.
 
In article <urGnAKOyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>,
Alias <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:

> > Of course, the Linux Loonies will deny these numbers. They always do.
> > Cue Alias and the Ubuntu marketing department.


> You misunderstand.


There he is, right on schedule! At least he didn't try to deny the
numbers.

> As a Windows user for many years, I thought I would
> never use Linux. I thought it would be too much command line and terms I
> really don't want to learn and would involve a lot of work and I believe
> that's the way Linux was for many years and, hence, the general opinion
> that Linux is for geeks. Once I installed it, I realized that my
> preconceptions were false and found it fairly easy to install and use.


No, it just means you became a geek.

BTW, that is *not* meant as an insult. I consider myself a geek also.
Anyone who actually installs OSes - as opposed to just getting one with
a computer and having no idea what an "OS" is - is a geek.

I've got Vista and 2 OS X versions on this computer, XP and OS X on
another, and Vista, XP and OS X on a third - with OS/2, BeOS and Windows
Server 2003 in VPC 2007 running under Vista. Plus a "real Mac" with a
Power PC G4 CPU running OS X and - for when I want to laugh at a
*really* primitive OS - MacOS 9.2.2. Pure geekdom!

However, Linux still does not appeal to me. I simply have no use for
it. I've had various Red Hat distros installed in VPC, but I never
really did anything with them. Basically just looked at them and said
"Meh. Big deal". I've tried installing "Ubuntu" in VPC but it
doesn't work.

Mike
 
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
news:eBHRTCNyHHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Gary wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:OxAUKeJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> norm wrote:
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and over
>>>>> 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last 10
>>>>> years.
>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>> Ubuntu is not crap on my desktop, so you might want to temper your urge
>>>> to speak for everyone. The safer statement might be that the majority
>>>> of the 98% that you speak of do not know of the linux alternative.
>>> But when they do, bye bye Microsoft to the same place Enron went.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> Yawn same old story. Just wait bla bla bla

>
> Nero. Fiddling.
>
> Alias


Keep dreaming your in a world of your own.
 
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
news:urGnAKOyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Mike wrote:
>> In article <uQ70n3NyHHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,
>> Tim Judd <tjudd01@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And really, M$ only has about 90% of the Internet community. 3.3%ish
>>> for Linux, 3.8%ish for Apple, and the rest is 'Other'. (trying to find
>>> source as we speak.. seen two sources, and don't have them bookmarked)

>>
>> That Linux number is way high. It's actually below 1%. See
>>
>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/June/os.php
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist/zeitgeist-jun04.html
>>
>> The last one is old, but is the latest numbers that Google published.
>> Gives a nice historical perspective for the non-growth of Linux desktops.
>>
>> Of course, the Linux Loonies will deny these numbers. They always do.
>> Cue Alias and the Ubuntu marketing department. Funny how no one else
>> does. Mac users, Windows users, everyone agrees these numbers are
>> pretty accurate.
>>> And Apple's Boot Camp technology on the Intel macs let you run any x86
>>> operating system on your Apple hardware. So now you buy one physical
>>> box and can run OS X, Windows, BSD, Linux, Solaris ...you name the rest.

>>
>> Just like *any* PC. I'm running OS X on an IBM ThinkPad T41.
>>
>> Mike

>
> You misunderstand. As a Windows user for many years, I thought I would
> never use Linux. I thought it would be too much command line and terms I
> really don't want to learn and would involve a lot of work and I believe
> that's the way Linux was for many years and, hence, the general opinion
> that Linux is for geeks. Once I installed it, I realized that my
> preconceptions were false and found it fairly easy to install and use.
>
> Alias


Wow how nice for you.
No go play with your toy and leave the real work to MS.
 
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
news:OKfGADNyHHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Gary wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and over 98%
>>>> of the world knows it.
>>> False and false.
>>>
>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last 10
>>>> years.
>>> False.
>>>
>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an arm and a
>>> leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better and free. Too bad,
>>> baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who does real
>> work.

>
> False (again).
>
> Alias


Really? prove it.
 
Frank wrote:
> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>> religious cults.
>>>>
>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free software
>>> movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a lot of
>>> communist use linux). I don't know if being an atheist/communist is
>>> some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux candidate, but the
>>> philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>>
>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>

> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
> software ideology rather nicely.
> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
> atheist or communist do you?
> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are correct
> in our assessment.
> Frank



Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
 
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think Frank *is* Steve Ballmer.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> I will consider that as a real compliment!
>> Thank you.
>> Frank

>
> Figures.
>
> Alias



> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1274983729713522403
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and
>>>>>> over 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> False and false.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last 10
>>>>>> years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> False.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an arm
>>>>> and a leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better and
>>>>> free. Too bad, baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who does
>>>> real work.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Truer words were never spoken! :-)
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>> Course neither of you dare to say what "real work" is and can only
>> snootily sneer at Open Source. Jealousy usually works that way.
>>
>> Alias

>
> There is a reality that you linux lovers are simply not willing or are
> unable to accept and that is that linux is not a main stream business os
> capable of running most "real world" productive software. And please,
> don't tell me about wine or emulators. We've been thru diatribe with you
> guys many times before and nothing, absolutely nothing, has changed. You
> still can't run most major software applications on linux...period! The
> software applications most business need and use on a daily basis will
> not run on linux. Linux has some applications that are "almost" similar,
> but "almost" won't cut it in the "real" business world.
> Sorry!
> You may think in your mind that is will but in the "real" world (a place
> you don't seem to be a part of) it really doesn't run the type of
> software most (90+ %) of all business need to run in order to be
> productive.
>
> Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel good
> because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know it doesn't.
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>



Actually Frank we feel sorry for you, anyone with such delusions
deserves sympathy rather than ridicule, however being an unsympathetic
kinda person I shall repeat my assertion that you are in fact a looney.
 
Mike wrote:
> In article <urGnAKOyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>,
> Alias <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
>
>>> Of course, the Linux Loonies will deny these numbers. They always do.
>>> Cue Alias and the Ubuntu marketing department.

>
>> You misunderstand.

>
> There he is, right on schedule! At least he didn't try to deny the
> numbers.
>
>> As a Windows user for many years, I thought I would
>> never use Linux. I thought it would be too much command line and terms I
>> really don't want to learn and would involve a lot of work and I believe
>> that's the way Linux was for many years and, hence, the general opinion
>> that Linux is for geeks. Once I installed it, I realized that my
>> preconceptions were false and found it fairly easy to install and use.

>
> No, it just means you became a geek.
>
> BTW, that is *not* meant as an insult. I consider myself a geek also.
> Anyone who actually installs OSes - as opposed to just getting one with
> a computer and having no idea what an "OS" is - is a geek.
>
> I've got Vista and 2 OS X versions on this computer, XP and OS X on
> another, and Vista, XP and OS X on a third - with OS/2, BeOS and Windows
> Server 2003 in VPC 2007 running under Vista. Plus a "real Mac" with a
> Power PC G4 CPU running OS X and - for when I want to laugh at a
> *really* primitive OS - MacOS 9.2.2. Pure geekdom!
>
> However, Linux still does not appeal to me. I simply have no use for
> it. I've had various Red Hat distros installed in VPC, but I never
> really did anything with them. Basically just looked at them and said
> "Meh. Big deal". I've tried installing "Ubuntu" in VPC but it
> doesn't work.
>
> Mike



Bit too hard for a novice maybe eh?
 
Frank wrote:
> norm wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>
>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer
>>> in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>>> software ideology rather nicely.
>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>>> atheist or communist do you?
>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>> correct in our assessment.
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>> Geez, Frank. Have you no shame? Of all the people you could identify
>> with and you choose him? ;)
>>

>
> Geez, norm, I'm only agreeing with his assessment.
> Which is so far correct.
> Is that a problem?
> Frank
>

So far, i've only seen that you and ballmer think it is correct. Haven't
heard from anyone else on the subject. ;) And I am not so sure that the
comparison he made has any real substance other than his assessment that
"free" equates to communism. I quote:
Ballmer wanted "to emphasise the competitive threat, and in some senses
the competitive opportunity, that Linux represents. Linux is a tough
competitor. There's no company called Linux, there's barely a Linux road
map. Yet Linux sort of springs organically from the earth. And it had,
you know, the characteristics of communism that people love so very,
very much about it. That is, it's free."
If anything, the statement gives short shrift to both communism and
linux. YMMV, and probably will. lol

--
norm
 
Charlie Tame wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>
>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>

>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>> software ideology rather nicely.
>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>> atheist or communist do you?
>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>> correct in our assessment.
>> Frank

>
>
>
> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank


hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
Frank
 
Charlie Tame wrote:

>
>
> Actually Frank we feel sorry for you, anyone with such delusions
> deserves sympathy rather than ridicule, however being an unsympathetic
> kinda person I shall repeat my assertion that you are in fact a looney.



Actually Charlie, the numbers prove exactly the opposite.
And very strongly so.
I'm right and you're the lunatic if you believe otherwise.
Sorry...:-)
Frank
 
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:41:39 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:


>Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel good
>because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know it doesn't.
>Frank
>

Somebody needs to tell Frankie how insecure he sounds.
 
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:40 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>> Geez, Frank. Have you no shame? Of all the people you could identify
>> with and you choose him? ;)
>>

>
>Geez, norm, I'm only agreeing with his assessment.
>Which is so far correct.
>Is that a problem?


No problem, I think many picture you acting just like Ballmer does in
the below video, only you act that way here in the newsgroup every
day. Very revealing.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1274983729713522403
 
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:52:00 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> I've been working with computer system long before you knew what a
>>> computer was.

>>
>> Really? The first time I operated a computer was in 1968. Remember punch
>> cards?

>
>Yes I was working on HP 3000, Data General 1200, and Univac 1108 systems
>with punch card readers.
>Also desiging hardware and software during that time.


Frank working with "hardware" circa the 60's.

http://www.highschoolyards-nur.edin.sch.uk/photos/constructional/lego1.jpg
 
Back
Top