Linux strikes back...

[Alias]

On 8/3/2010 8:05 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 10:44 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 7:39 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> But you don't have Windows 7 so you really can't be expected to know

>>> what you're talking about.

>>

>> Read my headers. You're lying again, wank.

>>

> Oh, so you're using one of your "customers" laptops that you "purchased"

> for them uh?

> Figures.



Figures? Please explain (you can't).



--

Alias

 

[Boscoe]

On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:



> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's Linux

> users is?

>





They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

kids Linux...

 

[Boscoe]

On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

>

> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

>



They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

LOL

 

[DanS]

Boscoe wrote in

news:Fye6o.47624$Gc2.47034@hurricane:



> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook

>>> IE6 in February 2010 to become the most popular browser

>>> in the world.

>>

>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most

>> attacked browser in the world. Combine that with the

>> malware vulnerable Windows and you've got a great combo

>> for a compromised computer.

>>

>

> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i%

> of the market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or

> 2000, lately?

> LOL



In the end, your argument means nothing because it still doesn't

change the fact that Linux isn't 'attacked'....



.....LOL....

 

[Alias]

On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>

>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's Linux

>> users is?

>>

>

>

> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

> kids Linux...



Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 8/4/2010 4:11 PM, Boscoe wrote:

> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

>>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

>>

>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

>> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

>> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

>>

>

> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

> market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

> LOL



Oh dear, another one who doesn't understand the difference between Linux

architecture and Windows architecture. Course, you don't seem to know

the difference between "1" and "i" either so it's not surprising.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 8/4/2010 4:11 PM, Boscoe wrote:

> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

>>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

>>

>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

>> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

>> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

>>

>

> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

> market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

> LOL



You snipped this:



> Windows is not perfect but it's easy to use and

> has made the computer so accessible to so many.



Not so easy to use when it keeps giving you a BSOD or is compromised by

malware.



Well?



--

Alias

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "itis

>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing sharein

>>>>>> the US.

>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>>> share of

>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

>>>>>> 0.4

>>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

>>>

>>> Wrong.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

>>>> worth

>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

>>>

>>> Wrong.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

>>>

>>> You're an idiot.

>>>

>> Projecting again...idiot?

>>

>

> That's all you've got?

>

That is more than you can handle!

Oops!

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>>>> everything else but more securely.

>>>>

>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

>>>

>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

>>

>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

>

> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

>

You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

Oops!

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>>

>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's Linux

>>> users is?

>>>

>>

>>

>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

>> kids Linux...

>

> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

>

Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

>>>>>>> "it is

>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

>>>>>>> share in

>>>>>>> the US.

>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>>>> share of

>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

>>>>>>> 0.4

>>>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

>>>>>> but

>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

>>>>

>>>> Wrong.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

>>>>> worth

>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

>>>>

>>>> Wrong.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

>>>>

>>>> You're an idiot.

>>>>

>>> Projecting again...idiot?

>>>

>>

>> That's all you've got?

>>

> That is more than you can handle!

> Oops!

>



You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

as you'd like to think it does. I just consider the source and I know

you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

with but, so far, all you have are LIES.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

>>>>>

>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

>>>>

>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

>>>

>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

>>

>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

>>

> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

> Oops!



Oh, I got it. It wasn't as clever as you think. Try running Compiz under

Windows.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

>>>> Linux

>>>> users is?

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

>>> kids Linux...

>>

>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

>>

> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?



As predictable as the tide. Yeah, I know what it is. You plagiarized the

phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

times every fucking day since.



--

Alias

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 7:44 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

>>>>>>>> "it is

>>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

>>>>>>>> share in

>>>>>>>> the US.

>>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>>>>> share of

>>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

>>>>>>>> 0.4

>>>>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

>>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

>>>>>

>>>>> Wrong.

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

>>>>>> worth

>>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

>>>>>

>>>>> Wrong.

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

>>>>>

>>>>> You're an idiot.

>>>>>

>>>> Projecting again...idiot?

>>>>

>>>

>>> That's all you've got?

>>>

>> That is more than you can handle!

>> Oops!

>>

>

> You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

> as you'd like to think it does.



HEHEHE...KEEP LYING...TO YOURSELF...HAHAHA!



I just consider the source and I know

> you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

> with but, so far, all you have are LIES.



I push all of your hate/anger buttons at will...my will. I say jump and

you say "how high"!

Oops!...LOL!

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 7:45 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

>>>>>

>>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

>>>>

>>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

>>>

>>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

>>>

>> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

>> Oops!

>

> Oh, I got it.



No, it's obvious you didn't.



It wasn't as clever as you think.



It was clever enough to stump an ignorant, unintelligent, uneducated

bozo like you.



Try running Compiz under

> Windows.



Only and a desperate loser like you would make a stupid statement like that.

Oops!

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 7:50 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

>>>>> Linux

>>>>> users is?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

>>>> kids Linux...

>>>

>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

>>>

>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

>

> As predictable as the tide.



Yes, you are.



Yeah, I know what it is.



I'm not to sure you really do.



You plagiarized the

> phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

> times every fucking day since.



Oh, so you're the first person to ever say that huh?...hahaha!

Sure you are!

Oh and you're misusing the term "plagiarized".

Oops!

 

[Boscoe]

On 04/08/2010 3:42 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

>>>> Linux

>>>> users is?

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

>>> kids Linux...

>>

>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

>>

> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?





He's stereotypical of the Linux troll. They despise Windows and use

jargon which is deliberately contrived simply to make it appear

different to Windows. 'Tux?, has spawned an entire sub-culture, a very

small clique with visions of grandeur.

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:54 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 7:44 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

>>>>>>>>> "it is

>>>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

>>>>>>>>> share in

>>>>>>>>> the US.

>>>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>>>>>> share of

>>>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

>>>>>>>>> 0.4

>>>>>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

>>>>>>>>> and

>>>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

>>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard

>>>>>>>> drives

>>>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>>>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Wrong.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

>>>>>>> worth

>>>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Wrong.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You're an idiot.

>>>>>>

>>>>> Projecting again...idiot?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> That's all you've got?

>>>>

>>> That is more than you can handle!

>>> Oops!

>>>

>>

>> You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

>> as you'd like to think it does.

>

> HEHEHE...KEEP LYING...TO YOURSELF...HAHAHA!



Hate to burst your troll bubble but you are as significant as a gnat.



>

> I just consider the source and I know

>> you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

>> with but, so far, all you have are LIES.

>

> I push all of your hate/anger buttons at will...my will. I say jump and

> you say "how high"!

> Oops!...LOL!

>

>

>



No, you don't. You think you do. You think you're cute and clever. You

think you've kicked the ass of multiple posters here. You think you can

fool people into thinking your rich and own property in France. Guess

what? No one believes you and no one comes round to say you've done any

of the above except YOU.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:57 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 7:45 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>>>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

>>>>>

>>>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

>>>>

>>>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

>>>>

>>> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

>>> Oops!

>>

>> Oh, I got it.

>

> No, it's obvious you didn't.



Yes, you think that Linux programs suck. It's obvious. If one can

understand Dick and Jane, one can understand your third grade posts.



>

> It wasn't as clever as you think.

>

> It was clever enough to stump an ignorant, unintelligent, uneducated

> bozo like you.



Erm, no it wasn't.



>

> Try running Compiz under

>> Windows.

>

> Only and a desperate loser like you would make a stupid statement like

> that.

> Oops!

>



We were talking about programs that will run in Linux but not in

Windows. You fell off the boat in the process and want to distract from

the fact that you're drowning in mistakes.



--

Alias

 

[Alias]

On 08/04/2010 04:59 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/4/2010 7:50 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

>>>>>> Linux

>>>>>> users is?

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

>>>>> kids Linux...

>>>>

>>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

>>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

>>>>

>>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

>>

>> As predictable as the tide.

>

> Yes, you are.

>

> Yeah, I know what it is.

>

> I'm not to sure you really do.

>

> You plagiarized the

>> phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

>> times every fucking day since.

>

> Oh, so you're the first person to ever say that huh?...hahaha!

> Sure you are!

> Oh and you're misusing the term "plagiarized".

> Oops!

>

>

>



How about "stole"? Is that better? You never used that phrase until I

did, along with others of mine that you use over and over again. You're

not imaginative or very bright and everyone knows that but you.



--

Alias