Linux strikes back...

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 4:07 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

> Linux is still under one percent and will always be under one percent.

> Imagine a FREE OS that most reject as garbage. Now that's funny.

>

>

>

> "Boscoe" wrote in message

> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane...

>>

>>

>>

>> Ha Ha Ha

>>

>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser

>> leader.

>



The freakin Iphone has almost as much market share as linsux. How pathetic.

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 4:08 PM, Gordon wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Hash: SHA1

>

> On 02/08/10 21:07, Pulled Pork wrote:

>> Linux is still under one percent and will always be under one percent.

>> Imagine a FREE OS that most reject as garbage. Now that's funny.

>>

>>

>>

> you really are not very intelligent, are you...

>

>

> - --

> Registered Linux User no 240308

> Say No to OOXML http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9594#mpart8

> gordonATgbpcomputingDOTcoDOTuk

> to email me remove the obvious!

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

>

> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMVyXOAAoJEHqLuzqp4/k5YqYH/Avjl7K3v7/HpqzVH3mgS2AZ

> MinSY6IVa0Qij6B9M3xyn8PaMlfaKE93d4IWmCDRQrvNEKqkARrYTljlj3+6qGSC

> 12a3BdGFv/uUgORkDLIANtGdEQfvwvtoRlP1twMPhvuPpIVG3DlkQfOYW2Cm5wiS

> kXUSarHaMCHv7O9P3a15gYnM9e9/NFn/CV7bSvj5Ly5FTHXQFCQOm8WDgUoHH6/B

> hnIad5SZK6YFCvi/6XOV1Zt5r0BX6aZu0NOUr+MOZaKyZcdgF4F6NC0sEQqacyjC

> /9fxSE+GC7VtddUZqb5BnKgojKGRbgYZqgaxapYDcHUg3GX20d43VdY1a2EDLnI=

> =yBhU

> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



You seem to be the dipshit G

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 6:10 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:00:11 -0700, Pulled Pork wrote:

>

>> "ray" wrote in message

>> news:8bopbmFlplU5@mid.individual.net...

>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:38:38 -0700, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>

>>>> "Gordon" wrote in message

>>>> news:i37912$t2b$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> Hash: SHA1

>>>>>

>>>>> On 02/08/10 21:11, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>> Crap. As all the rest of its posts.

>>>>> Bye bye!

>>>>>

>>>> A typical Ubuntard/Linuxtard who gets steamed when someone tells the

>>>> truth about that SHITTY Linux!

>>>

>>> If you really believed that, you wouldn't be so worried.

>>>

>>>

>> I'm not worried in the least about the Microsoft products I use. What

>> is funny is that so many people think that Linux is slamming Microsoft

>> which isn't true.

>

> People malign that which they fear. Fear of the unknown is still fear.



But no one fears linsux. It's not a threat to anyone or anything. People

malign linsux because of fools like you who proclaim it to be the best

when in fact normal people know it isn't. Yes I said your not normal,

I'm sure you couldn't pick that up by yourself.

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 6:11 PM, ray wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:51:50 -0700, Frank wrote:

>

>> On 8/2/2010 1:49 PM, ray wrote:

>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:38:38 -0700, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>

>>>> "Gordon" wrote in message

>>>> news:i37912$t2b$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> Hash: SHA1

>>>>>

>>>>> On 02/08/10 21:11, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>> Crap. As all the rest of its posts.

>>>>> Bye bye!

>>>>>

>>>> A typical Ubuntard/Linuxtard who gets steamed when someone tells the

>>>> truth about that SHITTY Linux!

>>>

>>> If you really believed that, you wouldn't be so worried.

>>

>> So why won't you answer my question ray...are you so worried...that I

>> will expose you for what you are...just another FUD spreading lying

>> linturd troll?

>> Oops!

>

> People malign that which they fear.

How about somethin new to say instead of repating yourself.

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 6:32 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Pulled Pork wrote:

>

>> I'm not worried in the least about the Microsoft products I use.

>

> You mean "steal".

>

> Most Wintards are software pirates.

>

Another fool with more lies

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 7:22 PM, milt wrote:

> On 8/2/2010 3:04 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>> Ha Ha Ha

>>

>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser

>> leader.

>

> Wow, Linux is about to be overtaken by the iPhone.

>



Ain't that a hoot!

 

[wonderwhy]

On 8/2/2010 9:03 PM, DanS wrote:

> Boscoe wrote in

> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>

>> > .aspx?qprid=8>

>>

>> Ha Ha Ha

>>

>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>> browser leader.

>

> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

And your point?

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 3:29 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 7:54 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 9:43 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 05:45 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 4:18 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 3:28 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>>>>> reversal

>>>>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>>>>> likes

>>>>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>>>> updates?

>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly

>>>>>>> think

>>>>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it. Are you one of them? Just

>>>>>>> curious,

>>>>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email? I hope it

>>>>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup

>>>>>>> posts

>>>>>>> safer.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well, you're the expert!!

>>>>>

>>>>> In computing, no one is an expert.

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Tell me why having Avast scanning my emails and NG posts, providing

>>>>>> the

>>>>>> same kind of protection as most commercial programs, with real-time

>>>>>> email and network monitoring and signature files updated on a daily

>>>>>> basis.

>>>>>

>>>>> It offers no further protection and can fuck up email programs.

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Then again, I've been using Windows for 15 years and never had a

>>>>>> compromised machine, yet.

>>>>>

>>>>> Nor have I and I've been using MS products since 1988. I used a Mac

>>>>> back

>>>>> in 84.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> And presumably you paid the $2,495 asking price?

>>>

>>> No, I paid $4000 because I also bought an external floppy drive, a

>>> backpack type thing to carry it around and a legal size Image Writer

>>> along with a few reams of high quality paper. I sold it in Venezuela for

>>> $6000 which covered what I paid, the bribe I had to pay to get it into

>>> Venezuela and a bit of a profit.

>>>

>> Translation: alias stole the MAC, proly from a company he was fired

>> from, and sold it to an unsuspecting victim in a foreign country.

>> Oops!

>>

>

> More lies from our desperate Village Idiot who is just dying to find

> something to put me down with.



You don't need my help in making a fool out of yourself.



The truth won't do that so, as usual, the

> wank relies on lies.



Prove you're not lying. I bet you stole the computer from a company you

got fired from, for being a lying, incompetent POS.



The person who bought it was a computer programmer

and knew exactly what he was getting.



I hope he did. But I bet he didn't know he might have been buying hot

property.

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 3:31 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 7:52 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 8:18 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 3:28 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>>

>>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>>> reversal

>>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>>> likes

>>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>> updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly

>>>>> think

>>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it. Are you one of them? Just

>>>>> curious,

>>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email? I hope it

>>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>>> safer.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well, you're the expert!!

>>>

>>> In computing, no one is an expert.

>>>

>> Especially you.

>

> The Wank thinks he's winning when he's losing again.

>

>>>>

>>>> Tell me why having Avast scanning my emails and NG posts, providing the

>>>> same kind of protection as most commercial programs, with real-time

>>>> email and network monitoring and signature files updated on a daily

>>>> basis.

>>>

>>> It offers no further protection and can fuck up email programs.

>>

>> LIAR!

>

> My, you are ill informed.



No, you are the FUD spreading lying linturd asshole loser.

>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Then again, I've been using Windows for 15 years and never had a

>>>> compromised machine, yet.

>>>

>>> Nor have I and I've been using MS products since 1988. I used a Mac back

>>> in 84.

>>

>> LIAR! You stole a MAC and later sold it. You're a thief

>

> You wish I was a thief.



I know you are a thief and a cheat and a liar.

Nice combo huh?



Course the fact that you accuse everyone that

> disagrees with you of being a thief begs the question if you're a thief.



You are the only cock sucking, sheep-fucking son of a cheap whore who I

have accused of thievery.

Oops!



> I don't know and, unlike you, I won't post a LIE.

>

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 3:33 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 8:03 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 10:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 07:42 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 8/3/2010 7:28 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>>

>>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>

>>>> Translation: alias can't deal with the truth!

>>>> Oops!

>

> No, he was being like you. Not very complicated except for idiots like you.

>

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>>> reversal

>>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>>> likes

>>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>> updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly

>>>>> think

>>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it.

>>>>

>>>> Where did you get the little tidbit of misinformation? Is that from

>>>> your

>>>> linux FUD book?

>>>

>>> Common knowledge, something you seriously lack.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Are you one of them? Just curious,

>>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email?

>>>>

>>>> You dumb fuck...that is a default setting...it's meaningless.

>>>> Moron!

>>>

>>> LOL! Keep it that way then. Your emails probably aren't worth saving

>>> anyway.

>>>

>> Nervous laugh...again...that means you've been caught lying...again!

>

> Laughing out loud is not a nervous laugh.



From you it is.

>

>>>>

>>>> I hope it

>>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>>> safer.

>>>>>

>>>> Is that what you think?

>>>> You are that stupid, aren't you.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> No, unlike you, I know what I'm talking about.

>>

>> No, you're stupid and your arrogance won't let you deal with the truth.

>

>

> Your say so isn't good enough.



You can't deal with the truth. We all know it!

Oops!

>

 

[DanS]

wonderwhy wrote in news:4c59be0b$0$8914

$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:



> On 8/2/2010 9:03 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote in

>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>

>>> >> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>

>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>

>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>> browser leader.

>>

>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

> And your point?



If I need to explain that, well....OK.....



If IE was already the browser leader, and you have automatic

updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You update to IE8.



It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly

apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it is

the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....



........regardless, what would be so spectacular about what was

the most used browser, IE (all versions), being upgraded to

IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ? I don't get it.



Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had

recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?



And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do with

Linux ?



(But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been beat to

death and was obviously created to be just a troll thread.

Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 2:34 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 01:30 AM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 4:02 PM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 10:37 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 8/3/2010 1:03 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>>>>> the US.

>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>>> share of

>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

>>>>>> 0.4

>>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>>>> more securely.

>>>>

>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>>

>>> MS just patched an out of band vulnerability in Windows 7. Linux is

>>> bulletproof compared to *any* version of Windows.

>>

>> Good for MS!

>

> Course, no update for the millions of Windows XP SP2 users. Not good.



Really? My XP SP3's got the update.

Maybe you should update to SP3.



> Course, the point wasn't that but the fact that Linux is bulletproof

> compared to Windows when it comes to security, something you ignored.



Well that might have been true years ago, but certainly not with Windows

Vista/7.

That piece of linturd FUD is dead.

>

>

>>>

>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows 7...PERIOD!!!

>>>> Live with it.

>>>

>>> I don't live with your lies, sorry.

>>

>> No, you live with your lies...all of them.

>> Oops!

>

> Here we go again with your uninformed crap. See above and try to think.



No, you see the above and think...wait...that might be asking too much

from you. Your FUD is old and no longer relevant.

>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>

>>>> As if any gives a shit.

>>>

>>> Intelligent people do so it's no wonder you don't.

>>

>> Only and idiot like you would beleive or make such a stupid statement.

>

> It's "believe" and you're the one who's stupid.

>>>

WoW! It is believe and you're still the one who's stupid...and arrogant,

and with the most fragile ego ever!

Oops!

>>

>>

>

>

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 3:34 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 8:05 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 10:44 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 8/3/2010 7:39 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> But you don't have Windows 7 so you really can't be expected to know

>>>> what you're talking about.

>>>

>>> Read my headers. You're lying again, wank.

>>>

>> Oh, so you're using one of your "customers" laptops that you "purchased"

>> for them uh?

>> Figures.

>

> Figures? Please explain (you can't).

>

So now you're having reading comprehension problems, huh?

You're stoned...again, right?

Oops!

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 1:21 PM, DanS wrote:

> wonderwhy wrote in news:4c59be0b$0$8914

> $c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:

>

>> On 8/2/2010 9:03 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>

>>>> share

>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>

>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>

>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>> browser leader.

>>>

>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>> And your point?

>

> If I need to explain that, well....OK.....

>

> If IE was already the browser leader, and you have automatic

> updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You update to IE8.



Why? Offered and forced to update aren't the same thing.

You have no idea how many did or didn't update, do you.

You just like to parse your words to your liking.

Then you get caught in your own stupid, meaningless diatribe.

Everyone in here watches you do that all the time.

>

> It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly

> apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it is

> the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....

>

> .......regardless, what would be so spectacular about what was

> the most used browser, IE (all versions), being upgraded to

> IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ? I don't get it.

>

> Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had

> recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?

>

> And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do with

> Linux ?

>

> (But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been beat to

> death and was obviously created to be just a troll thread.

> Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)



Yeah, and you are the one of the ones who beat it to death.

Oh and it's "thread".

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

[DanS]

>>

>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>> And your point?

>>

>> If I need to explain that, well....OK.....

>>

>> If IE was already the browser leader, and you have

>> automatic updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You

>> update to IE8.

>

> Why? Offered and forced to update aren't the same thing.

> You have no idea how many did or didn't update, do you.

> You just like to parse your words to your liking.

> Then you get caught in your own stupid, meaningless

> diatribe. Everyone in here watches you do that all the

> time.



1) *You* have no idea who updated or not either. If you were to

look, you could see that the 'market share' of earlier versions

goes down as IE8's 'market share' goes up.



2) It was a sensible hypothesis, and anyone that can be

objective I think would agree.



3) It wasn't a stupid meaningless diatribe. That's your job.





>>

>> It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly

>> apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it

>> is the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....

>>

>> .......regardless, what would be so spectacular about what

>> was the most used browser, IE (all versions), being

>> upgraded to IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ?

>> I don't get it.

>>

>> Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had

>> recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?

>>

>> And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do

>> with Linux ?

>>

>> (But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been

>> beat to death and was obviously created to be just a troll

>> thread. Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)

>

> Yeah, and you are the one of the ones who beat it to death.

> Oh and it's "thread".



No, it was you and Alias and Pork Puller that killed this

thread. Do I need to count how many posts each of you made in

this thread ? Let's try to be realistic for once, can you ?



That was a typo. Of which you make constantly. Obviously you

knew exactly what I meant.



Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?



(I didn't think so, now beat it son, you bother me.)

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 3:38 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>

>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>> And your point?

>>>

>>> If I need to explain that, well....OK.....

>>>

>>> If IE was already the browser leader, and you have

>>> automatic updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You

>>> update to IE8.

>>

>> Why? Offered and forced to update aren't the same thing.

>> You have no idea how many did or didn't update, do you.

>> You just like to parse your words to your liking.

>> Then you get caught in your own stupid, meaningless

>> diatribe. Everyone in here watches you do that all the

>> time.

>

> 1) *You* have no idea who updated or not either.



*I* never said *I* did! Keep parsing...the hole you're in is getting deeper!



If you were to

> look, you could see that the 'market share' of earlier versions

> goes down as IE8's 'market share' goes up.



Well DUH...How long did it take for you realize that market rule?

>

> 2) It was a sensible hypothesis, and anyone that can be

> objective I think would agree.



There is something really wrong with you.

>

> 3) It wasn't a stupid meaningless diatribe.



Of course it was.



That's your job.



No, that is what you're in charge of...stupid, diatribes, and vile

disgusting insults to others family members.

You're a weak little coward...just like your butt-buddy alias, the

sheep-fucker is.

>

>

>>>

>>> It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly

>>> apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it

>>> is the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....

>>>

>>> .......regardless, what would be so spectacular about what

>>> was the most used browser, IE (all versions), being

>>> upgraded to IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ?

>>> I don't get it.

>>>

>>> Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had

>>> recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?

>>>

>>> And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do

>>> with Linux ?

>>>

>>> (But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been

>>> beat to death and was obviously created to be just a troll

>>> thread. Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)

>>

>> Yeah, and you are the one of the ones who beat it to death.

>> Oh and it's "thread".

>

> No, it was you and Alias and Pork Puller that killed this

> thread.



So why are you still posting?



Do I need to count how many posts each of you made in

> this thread ?



Like I give a shit. WTF do you think you are, anyway?



Let's try to be realistic for once, can you ?



Something you certainly can't seem to do.

>

> That was a typo. Of which you make constantly.



Blame your incompetence on others. You're famous for doing that.



Obviously you

> knew exactly what I meant.



Keep ass-uming...you are getting good at it.

>

> Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?



Only that you're an arrogant asshole.

Got it?

>

> (I didn't think so, now beat it son, you bother me.)



Son? Wanna go a few rounds with me old man?

No? Figures. You're a really vile, disgusting, POS big mouthed loser.

Go fuck yourself as I'm sure no one else in there right mind would want

anything to do with a fuckwit moron loser like you.



Post your diatribe response here--->

 

[DanS]

>> Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?



I knew you didn't.

 

[Frank]

On 8/4/2010 4:37 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?

>

> I knew you didn't.

>

You must have missed it...I said you're a disgusting, vile, POS asshole

loser creep!

And that is almost a compliment to you.

Maybe you need to print that out and take it to an adult who will

explain it to you.

 

[Boscoe]

On 04/08/2010 6:42 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/04/2010 06:57 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 04/08/2010 5:52 PM, Alias wrote:>>

>>>>> We don't buy computers for people. The computer business is a very,

>>>>> very, very small part of what we do. The other businesses have nothing

>>>>> to do with buying or repairing computers.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Is your other job a part-time matador? Because there's plenty of

>>>> bullshit flying.

>>>

>>> I agree, Frank's full of bullshit and so are you.

>>>

>>

>> I've got relatives in Spain and the country's bust.

>

> You mean your relatives are unemployed. Spain owes less than California

> and much less than the USA as a whole. Spaniards go to NYC for their

> xmas shopping, the USA is so cheap.

>





Poor deluded fool. I could say my relatives own hotels - which

incidentally they do - but then again I could say anything I like on

here just like you do, but I'm not a fantasist. Your missive are all

fiction with a large dollop of fantasy content. And do you know the sad

part, you believe it?

 

[DanS]

>

> Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising

> money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots

> bought AOL?



If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be what

it is today.....



Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)



AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to

America.



It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's millions

at a time making them cost very little per unit, then dump them

off at every POS location in the country and have them labelled

free....as well as a mailing campaign.



The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other single

online service, like Compuserve......



And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.



That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best provider,

but, I really don't think we'd be where we are today w/AOL.



.......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been the

leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was in fact

AOL.)