Linux strikes back...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boscoe
  • Start date Start date
On 08/03/2010 10:37 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 1:03 PM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>> go, or in

>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>

>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>

>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>

>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>

>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>

>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>

>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>

>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>

>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>

>>>> Nope.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>

>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>> the US.

>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>> per cent."

>>>

>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>

>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>


>>

>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>> more securely.


>

> *BULLSHIT*!!!




MS just patched an out of band vulnerability in Windows 7. Linux is

bulletproof compared to *any* version of Windows.



> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows 7...PERIOD!!!

> Live with it.




I don't live with your lies, sorry.



>

> Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.


>

> As if any gives a shit.




Intelligent people do so it's no wonder you don't.



--

Alias
 
On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>

>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>

>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>

>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>

>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>

>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>

>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>

>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>

>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>>> the US.

>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>>> per cent."

>>>>

>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>

>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!


>

> Wrong.

>

>>

>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux worth

>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.


>

> Wrong.

>

>>

>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!


>

> You're an idiot.

>


Projecting again...idiot?
 
On 03/08/2010 10:28 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

>> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global gains

>> for


>

> Other facts......

>

> -IE8 was released in March 2009, which isn't..."Interestingly

> IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser leader."

>

> ......that's going on 17 months, not 10.

>

> -IE8 still doesn't have the Market share IE7 did at the time IE8

> was released.

>

> -There are still more users (% wise) of IE6& IE7 (combined)

> than of IE8.

>

>

>

> I also fail to see how your little tirade has anything to do

> with Linux, as your subject would lead people to believe.

>

> Are you the Usenet version of Fox News ?

>

>






That's because you not too bright. According to another troll on here,

Linux is fast catching Windows

in popularity and that's why the satirical headline.



IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world. No good

at Maths, either? But keep digging...
 
On 8/3/2010 4:02 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 10:37 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 1:03 PM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>

>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>

>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>

>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>

>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>

>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>

>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>

>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>

>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>>> the US.

>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>>> per cent."

>>>>

>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>

>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>> more securely.


>>

>> *BULLSHIT*!!!


>

> MS just patched an out of band vulnerability in Windows 7. Linux is

> bulletproof compared to *any* version of Windows.




Good for MS!

>

>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows 7...PERIOD!!!

>> Live with it.


>

> I don't live with your lies, sorry.




No, you live with your lies...all of them.

Oops!

>

>>

>> Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.


>>

>> As if any gives a shit.


>

> Intelligent people do so it's no wonder you don't.




Only and idiot like you would beleive or make such a stupid statement.

>
 
Whoever or whomever dreamt up the God dam name Linux should have been ran over

by a train. What kind of a twat comes up with the name Linux?



Pulled Pork wrote:



> Linux is still under one percent and will always be under one percent.

> Imagine a FREE OS that most reject as garbage. Now that's funny.

>

> "Boscoe" wrote in message

> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane...

> >

> >

> > Ha Ha Ha

> >

> > Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser leader.




--

The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG



Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city



Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know proper

manners



Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs but got fired the first day on

the job for potty mouth,



Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!



El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar



Master Juba was a black man imitating a white man imitating a black man



Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions beyond the

realm of understandability



Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday
 
On 03/08/2010 9:03 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>

>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>

>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>

>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>

>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>> go, or in

>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>> more than it lost.

>>>

>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>> 59.75%.......

>>>

>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>> 60.74%.

>>>

>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>

>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>

>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>

>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>

>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>

>>>

>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>> ever before.

>>>>

>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>

>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>

>>> Nope.

>>>

>>>


>>

>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>

>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>> the US.

>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>> per cent."

>>

>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>> has been declining ever since."

>>

>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>


>

> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>




Linux is OK but its not sexy and will never capture the public's

imagination. How many years has it been going now and still has less

than 1% of the market? Windows is not perfect but it's easy to use and

has made the computer so accessible to so many. The funny thing is if

the vast majority of the public were using Linux, today's Linux users

wouldn't be using it.
 
Boscoe wrote in

news:VC16o.46713$Gc2.20095@hurricane:



> On 03/08/2010 10:28 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

>>> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global

>>> gains for


>>

>> Other facts......

>>

>> -IE8 was released in March 2009, which

>> isn't..."Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become

>> the global browser leader."

>>

>> ......that's going on 17 months, not 10.

>>

>> -IE8 still doesn't have the Market share IE7 did at the

>> time IE8 was released.

>>

>> -There are still more users (% wise) of IE6& IE7

>> (combined) than of IE8.

>>

>>

>>

>> I also fail to see how your little tirade has anything to

>> do with Linux, as your subject would lead people to

>> believe.

>>

>> Are you the Usenet version of Fox News ?

>>

>>


>

>

> That's because you not too bright.




I'm jot to bright because I fail to see some non-existant link

that you claim ?



> According to another

> troll on here, Linux is fast catching Windows

> in popularity and that's why the satirical headline.




I don't care what anyone else says, and you're post had

nothing to do with anything and didn't reference anything in

particular ever said.



You are making up sh*t to not look like a d*ck....



......and it's not working.





> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook

> IE6 in February 2010 to become the most popular browser in

> the world. No good at Maths, either? But keep digging...




None of that says anything about about the massive exodus from

other browsers to IE8......which is what your claim was.....



.....which you followed up with "The world?s most popular

browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of the global

browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

per cent."



Yeah !!!! 0.4% increase.....WooHoo!!!!!



I'm done laughing at your inane sense of accomplishment.



Don't bother replying, because I won't be replying to your

faux news.
 
"Pulled Pork" wrote in

news:4c587885$1@news.x-privat.org:



>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ket- sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become

>>>>>>>>>> the global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much

>>>>>>> sense, do you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer,

>>>>>>> which is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which

>>>>>>> has continually lost share to the likes of Firefox

>>>>>>> over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>>> updates? Idiots!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that

>>>>>> already *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set

>>>>>> to automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid

>>>>>> justification as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over

>>>>> the last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some

>>>>> of its market share to Firefox. You know people

>>>>> switching to Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>> go, or in

>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining

>>>>> back more than it lost.

>>>>

>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years,

>>>> where the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a

>>>> low of 59.75%.......

>>>>

>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed'

>>>> back to 60.74%.

>>>>

>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you*

>>>> linked.)

>>>>

>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?q

>>>> prid= 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>

>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>

>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>

>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't

>>>> even understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers

>>>>> than ever before.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>

>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't

>>>> even know he's trying to say ?

>>>>

>>>> Nope.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

>>> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global

>>> gains for

>>>

>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of

>>> increasing share in the US.

>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per

>>> cent share of the global browser market during July, up

>>> on the previous month by 0.4 per cent."

>>>

>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59

>>> per cent and has been declining ever since."

>>>

>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows

>>> froupe.

>>>


>>

>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>> everything else but more securely. Computers aren't

>> expensive these days and hard drives even cheaper. Hell,

>> you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>

>> --

>> Alias


>

> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in

> Windows. - Hey fuckwit - That would be all of them!




Not true.



I installed the Windows version of Quake3 in Windows XP and

under Linux using WINE, and the Linux install gave faster

frame rates on the same computer over the native Windows

install.
 


>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>> everything else but more securely.


>

> *BULLSHIT*!!!

> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.




You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.
 
On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>> everything else but more securely.


>>

>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.


>

> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.




Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
 
On 08/04/2010 01:30 AM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 4:02 PM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 10:37 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/3/2010 1:03 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>

>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>

>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>>>> the US.

>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>> share of

>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>

>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>

>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>>> more securely.

>>>

>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!


>>

>> MS just patched an out of band vulnerability in Windows 7. Linux is

>> bulletproof compared to *any* version of Windows.


>

> Good for MS!




Course, no update for the millions of Windows XP SP2 users. Not good.

Course, the point wasn't that but the fact that Linux is bulletproof

compared to Windows when it comes to security, something you ignored.





>>

>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows 7...PERIOD!!!

>>> Live with it.


>>

>> I don't live with your lies, sorry.


>

> No, you live with your lies...all of them.

> Oops!




Here we go again with your uninformed crap. See above and try to think.



>>

>>>

>>> Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>

>>> As if any gives a shit.


>>

>> Intelligent people do so it's no wonder you don't.


>

> Only and idiot like you would beleive or make such a stupid statement.




It's "believe" and you're the one who's stupid.

>>


>

>






--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>>> everything else but more securely.

>>>

>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.


>>

>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.


>

> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.




You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?



--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 01:57 AM, Boscoe wrote:

> On 03/08/2010 9:03 PM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>> go, or in

>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>

>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>

>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>

>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>

>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>

>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>

>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>

>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>

>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>

>>>> Nope.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>

>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>> the US.

>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>> per cent."

>>>

>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>

>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>


>>

>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>


>

> Linux is OK but its not sexy and will never capture the public's

> imagination. How many years has it been going now and still has less

> than 1% of the market?




According to a web site that favors Windows. Statistics are easily

skewered. Other web net stats say over 10%. It also varies from country

to country. The USA, for example, was the number one country to use AOL.

In many countries, like Spain, AOL tried and failed to peddle their

crap. Windows is the same. If you were to take the USA's stats out,

Linux would have a much higher percentage. Also, you fail to take into

account that that one or ten percent in numbers of machines has grown

immensely since Linux got started so the total number of machines using

Linux is much more but not reflected in the stats Windows lovers just

love to cite.



> Windows is not perfect but it's easy to use and

> has made the computer so accessible to so many.




Not so easy to use when it keeps giving you a BSOD or is compromised by

malware.



> The funny thing is if

> the vast majority of the public were using Linux, today's Linux users

> wouldn't be using it.




And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's Linux

users is?



--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.




Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.



--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 01:46 AM, Tony wrote:

> Whoever or whomever dreamt up the God dam name Linux should have been ran over

> by a train. What kind of a twat comes up with the name Linux?




It's a combination of Linus and Unix. Too complicated for you? Everyone

act surprised.



>

> Pulled Pork wrote:

>

>> Linux is still under one percent and will always be under one percent.

>> Imagine a FREE OS that most reject as garbage. Now that's funny.

>>

>> "Boscoe" wrote in message

>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane...

>>>

>>>

>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>

>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser leader.


>

> --

> The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG

>

> Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city

>

> Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know proper

> manners

>

> Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs but got fired the first day on

> the job for potty mouth,

>

> Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!

>

> El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar

>

> Master Juba was a black man imitating a white man imitating a black man

>

> Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions beyond the

> realm of understandability

>

> Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday

>

>






--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>>

>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>>>

>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>>>> the US.

>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

>>>>> share of

>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>>>> per cent."

>>>>>

>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>>>

>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!


>>

>> Wrong.

>>

>>>

>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux worth

>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.


>>

>> Wrong.

>>

>>>

>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!


>>

>> You're an idiot.

>>


> Projecting again...idiot?

>




That's all you've got?



--

Alias
 
On 08/04/2010 02:53 AM, DanS wrote:

> "Pulled Pork" wrote in

> news:4c587885$1@news.x-privat.org:

>

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ket- sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become

>>>>>>>>>>> the global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much

>>>>>>>> sense, do you?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer,

>>>>>>>> which is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which

>>>>>>>> has continually lost share to the likes of Firefox

>>>>>>>> over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>>>> updates? Idiots!!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that

>>>>>>> already *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set

>>>>>>> to automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid

>>>>>>> justification as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over

>>>>>> the last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some

>>>>>> of its market share to Firefox. You know people

>>>>>> switching to Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>>> go, or in

>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining

>>>>>> back more than it lost.

>>>>>

>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years,

>>>>> where the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a

>>>>> low of 59.75%.......

>>>>>

>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed'

>>>>> back to 60.74%.

>>>>>

>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you*

>>>>> linked.)

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?q

>>>>> prid= 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>>

>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>>

>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>>

>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't

>>>>> even understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers

>>>>>> than ever before.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>>

>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't

>>>>> even know he's trying to say ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

>>>> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global

>>>> gains for

>>>>

>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of

>>>> increasing share in the US.

>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per

>>>> cent share of the global browser market during July, up

>>>> on the previous month by 0.4 per cent."

>>>>

>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59

>>>> per cent and has been declining ever since."

>>>>

>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows

>>>> froupe.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

>>> everything else but more securely. Computers aren't

>>> expensive these days and hard drives even cheaper. Hell,

>>> you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in

>> Windows. - Hey fuckwit - That would be all of them!


>

> Not true.

>

> I installed the Windows version of Quake3 in Windows XP and

> under Linux using WINE, and the Linux install gave faster

> frame rates on the same computer over the native Windows

> install.




Chrome is faster and, of course, the Internet is faster.



--

Alias
 
On 8/3/2010 7:54 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 9:43 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 05:45 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 4:18 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 3:28 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>>>> reversal

>>>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>>>> likes

>>>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>>> updates?

>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly

>>>>>> think

>>>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it. Are you one of them? Just

>>>>>> curious,

>>>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email? I hope it

>>>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>>>> safer.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Well, you're the expert!!

>>>>

>>>> In computing, no one is an expert.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Tell me why having Avast scanning my emails and NG posts, providing

>>>>> the

>>>>> same kind of protection as most commercial programs, with real-time

>>>>> email and network monitoring and signature files updated on a daily

>>>>> basis.

>>>>

>>>> It offers no further protection and can fuck up email programs.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Then again, I've been using Windows for 15 years and never had a

>>>>> compromised machine, yet.

>>>>

>>>> Nor have I and I've been using MS products since 1988. I used a Mac

>>>> back

>>>> in 84.

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> And presumably you paid the $2,495 asking price?


>>

>> No, I paid $4000 because I also bought an external floppy drive, a

>> backpack type thing to carry it around and a legal size Image Writer

>> along with a few reams of high quality paper. I sold it in Venezuela for

>> $6000 which covered what I paid, the bribe I had to pay to get it into

>> Venezuela and a bit of a profit.

>>


> Translation: alias stole the MAC, proly from a company he was fired

> from, and sold it to an unsuspecting victim in a foreign country.

> Oops!

>




More lies from our desperate Village Idiot who is just dying to find

something to put me down with. The truth won't do that so, as usual, the

wank relies on lies. The person who bought it was a computer programmer

and knew exactly what he was getting.



--

Alias
 
On 8/3/2010 7:52 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 8:18 AM, Alias wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 3:28 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>

>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>> reversal

>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>> likes

>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>> updates?

>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>

>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly think

>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it. Are you one of them? Just

>>>> curious,

>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email? I hope it

>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>> safer.

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Well, you're the expert!!


>>

>> In computing, no one is an expert.

>>


> Especially you.




The Wank thinks he's winning when he's losing again.



>>>

>>> Tell me why having Avast scanning my emails and NG posts, providing the

>>> same kind of protection as most commercial programs, with real-time

>>> email and network monitoring and signature files updated on a daily

>>> basis.


>>

>> It offers no further protection and can fuck up email programs.


>

> LIAR!




My, you are ill informed.



>>

>>>

>>> Then again, I've been using Windows for 15 years and never had a

>>> compromised machine, yet.


>>

>> Nor have I and I've been using MS products since 1988. I used a Mac back

>> in 84.


>

> LIAR! You stole a MAC and later sold it. You're a thief




You wish I was a thief. Course the fact that you accuse everyone that

disagrees with you of being a thief begs the question if you're a thief.

I don't know and, unlike you, I won't post a LIE.



--

Alias
 
On 8/3/2010 8:03 PM, Frank wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 10:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>> On 08/03/2010 07:42 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 8/3/2010 7:28 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>

>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>

>>> Translation: alias can't deal with the truth!

>>> Oops!




No, he was being like you. Not very complicated except for idiots like you.



>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>> reversal

>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>> likes

>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>> updates?

>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>

>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly think

>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it.

>>>

>>> Where did you get the little tidbit of misinformation? Is that from your

>>> linux FUD book?


>>

>> Common knowledge, something you seriously lack.

>>

>>>

>>> Are you one of them? Just curious,

>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email?

>>>

>>> You dumb fuck...that is a default setting...it's meaningless.

>>> Moron!


>>

>> LOL! Keep it that way then. Your emails probably aren't worth saving

>> anyway.

>>


> Nervous laugh...again...that means you've been caught lying...again!




Laughing out loud is not a nervous laugh.



>>>

>>> I hope it

>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>> safer.

>>>>

>>> Is that what you think?

>>> You are that stupid, aren't you.

>>>

>>>


>>

>> No, unlike you, I know what I'm talking about.


>

> No, you're stupid and your arrogance won't let you deal with the truth.






Your say so isn't good enough.



--

Alias
 
Back
Top