Linux strikes back...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boscoe
  • Start date Start date
On 8/3/2010 9:43 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 05:45 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 03/08/2010 4:18 PM, Alias wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 3:28 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>>>

>>>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a

>>>>>> reversal

>>>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>>>> likes

>>>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic

>>>>>> updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly

>>>>> think

>>>>> that IE is secure because MS made it. Are you one of them? Just

>>>>> curious,

>>>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email? I hope it

>>>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>>>> safer.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well, you're the expert!!

>>>

>>> In computing, no one is an expert.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Tell me why having Avast scanning my emails and NG posts, providing the

>>>> same kind of protection as most commercial programs, with real-time

>>>> email and network monitoring and signature files updated on a daily

>>>> basis.

>>>

>>> It offers no further protection and can fuck up email programs.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Then again, I've been using Windows for 15 years and never had a

>>>> compromised machine, yet.

>>>

>>> Nor have I and I've been using MS products since 1988. I used a Mac back

>>> in 84.

>>>


>>

>>

>> And presumably you paid the $2,495 asking price?


>

> No, I paid $4000 because I also bought an external floppy drive, a

> backpack type thing to carry it around and a legal size Image Writer

> along with a few reams of high quality paper. I sold it in Venezuela for

> $6000 which covered what I paid, the bribe I had to pay to get it into

> Venezuela and a bit of a profit.

>


Translation: alias stole the MAC, proly from a company he was fired

from, and sold it to an unsuspecting victim in a foreign country.

Oops!
 
On 8/3/2010 10:32 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 07:26 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 9:46 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 05:41 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:i39d5v$lb5$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:37 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Tattoo Vampire" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:7fye02htjd6r$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...

>>>>>>> Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> People ditch what they don't like.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Is that why your wife ditched you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Looks like your head is up your ass again. She didn't ditch me. Oops.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yeah, she knows no one in their right mind would have anything to do

>>>>> with her except you. You have the same problem. Perfect match.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> This coming from an idiot who has had 4 wives. No a great track record

>>>> douche bag.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Jealous? I have also had many girlfriends in between and before the

>>> wives. You, OTOH, married your high school sweetheart and have lived a

>>> sheltered and boring life. I feel sorry for you.


>>

>> So you ended up with wifie #4, living on the 2nd floor of a run down

>> apartment building,


>

> False.




1st lie!

>

>> somewhere in the slums of a city in spain, proly on

>> welfare,


>

> False.




2nd lie!

>

>> and you've got hepatitis C.


>

> Had, I went through treatment and killed it.




3rd lie!

>

>> That is how you've ended up.

>> WoW...and you seem to be proud of it.

>>

>>

>>


>

> Your imagination is getting the best of you again, Frank.




hehehe...I perfectly nailed you and your pathetic excuse for a life.

Oops!
 
On 8/3/2010 10:32 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 07:28 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 1:08 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 01:52 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 8/2/2010 4:30 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 01:18 AM, Frank wrote:

>>>>>> On 8/2/2010 3:11 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:51:50 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 8/2/2010 1:49 PM, ray wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:38:38 -0700, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "Gordon" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:i37912$t2b$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/08/10 21:11, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Crap. As all the rest of its posts.

>>>>>>>>>>> Bye bye!

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> A typical Ubuntard/Linuxtard who gets steamed when someone tells

>>>>>>>>>> the

>>>>>>>>>> truth about that SHITTY Linux!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you really believed that, you wouldn't be so worried.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> So why won't you answer my question ray...are you so

>>>>>>>> worried...that I

>>>>>>>> will expose you for what you are...just another FUD spreading lying

>>>>>>>> linturd troll?

>>>>>>>> Oops!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> People malign that which they fear.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So you fear me and thus malign me.

>>>>>> That is rather obvious.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> No one is afraid of a phony like you, Frank.

>>>>>

>>>> Wanna prove it coward?

>>>> Then send me a 1st class airline ticket.

>>>

>>> Do you also want me to get you a room in a five star hotel? How about a

>>> limo to pick you up at the airport?

>>>

>>>> Well...?

>>>> No?

>>>> Figures...YOU ARE SUCH A LYING LITTLE SHIT...A REAL BIG MOUTHED COWARD!

>>>

>>> You claim you're financially secure. Buy your own fucking ticket, big

>>> mouth.

>>>


>> hey sheep-fucker. I offered to send you a ticket (1st class) to meet me

>> in Paris. You declined. Now I'm simply asking you to extend the same

>> offer to me.

>> Are you that broke?

>> Figures!


>

> I don't give pearls to swine, to quote your Bible.

>




Translation: alias IS broke!...LOL!

Oops!
 
On 8/3/2010 10:39 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 07:36 PM, Frank wrote:

>> I own my own businesses and hire people to do jobs.

>>

>> Uhhh...you are the lone sales/marketing force for that POS toy os,

>> up-yr-fucking-butt-too, and you work for an "engineer" who "fixes"

>> everything for those poor suckers you con into using your 'services',

>> right?


>

> Wrong, as usual.

>


LIAR! You so much as told us the same story. Getting lies mixed up...again?
 
On 8/3/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 07:38 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 9:38 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 05:39 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:i38j18$rd1$6@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:05 AM, Dweezel AnalRetentive wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:i37kkq$r25$5@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 01:29 AM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 12:22 AM, milt wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On 8/2/2010 3:04 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>>>>> browser

>>>>>>>>>> leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Wow, Linux is about to be overtaken by the iPhone.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Odd that. The iPhone is very expensive and Linux is...er... free!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising money, you can

>>>>>>> sell anything. Remember how many idiots bought AOL? With Linux, at

>>>>>>> least you know your money isn't going to China, India or the Middle

>>>>>>> East.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You might be able to sell anything with enough advertising money but

>>>>>> you

>>>>>> CAN'T give away that SHITTY Ubuntu! LOL!

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Put Apple's or Microsoft's advertising money behind Linux and then we

>>>>> can talk.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> Why would they want to put money behind some shitty product they can't

>>>> give away? Why wouldn't word of mouth spread across the planet that

>>>> there is an OS that will bury Microsoft? I'll tell you why. Ubuntu is

>>>> shit and will always be shit. No need to put money into a pile of shit.

>>>>

>>>> Marketing 101.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> You don't understand but that won't stop you from making a fool out of

>>> yourself. What was it about what AOL did that you didn't understand?

>>>


>> hehehe...I love it when you're cornered and you change the subject.

>> You're like a little boy who when he closes his eyes he thinks no one

>> can see him...LOL!


>

> You didn't get it either but that was to be expected. Here it is again.

> Read it slowly:

>

> Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising money, you can

> sell anything.




Wrong! Money does not guarantee sales success.



Remember how many idiots bought AOL?



You were one of them?

Figures.



With Linux, at least

> you know your money isn't going to China, India or the Middle East.\




So no one in those countries profits one cent form any linux distros?

I seriously doubt that to be true.
 
"Alias" wrote in message

news:i39jvo$k02$4@news.eternal-september.org...

> On 08/03/2010 07:30 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:i39jhd$im7$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 08/03/2010 07:15 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:i39h5t$7pa$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:41 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:i39d5v$lb5$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:37 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Tattoo Vampire" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:7fye02htjd6r$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...

>>>>>>>>> Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> People ditch what they don't like.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Is that why your wife ditched you?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Looks like your head is up your ass again. She didn't ditch me.

>>>>>>>> Oops.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah, she knows no one in their right mind would have anything to do

>>>>>>> with her except you. You have the same problem. Perfect match.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> This coming from an idiot who has had 4 wives. No a great track

>>>>>> record

>>>>>> douche bag.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Jealous? I have also had many girlfriends in between and before the

>>>>> wives. You, OTOH, married your high school sweetheart and have lived a

>>>>> sheltered and boring life. I feel sorry for you.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> Sorry but you know nothing. I didn't marry my high school sweetheart

>>>> but

>>>> we are still friends to this day. Don't live a boring and sheltered

>>>> life. Have traveled quite a bit have a nice family and friends. Also

>>>> have a good job and I'm healthy. Own my house and have a nice car.

>>>

>>> Oh, you're a material girl.


>>

>> If you call living in a house and owning a car to get to work and play,

>> then I guess so.

>>

>>>

>>>> Another bonus, I don't use that SHITTY Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>>> Sorry about your situation. Counting that imaginary $14k a week you

>>>> claim to get? HA HA HA HA HA

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> My accountant does the counting. So, I have two things you're jealous

>>> of: my income and my love life. Anything else?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> You're too stupid to count the money? How do you know your accountant is

>> putting all that money in the bank? Or does your accountant take the

>> money and purchase drugs for you?

>>

>>

>>


>

> He doesn't get to touch one Eur cent. If you go to your bank's web site,

> you can see how much you have, dumb fuck. I don't deal in cash.

>

> --

> Alias




You don't deal in cash because you don't have any!
 
On 8/3/2010 10:46 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 07:42 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 8/3/2010 7:28 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote:

>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> >>>>>> .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the global

>>>>>>> browser leader.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do you?

>>>

>>> Trying to be a Frank wannabe?


>>

>> Translation: alias can't deal with the truth!

>> Oops!

>>>

>>>>

>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which is a reversal

>>>> in the browser?s fortunes, which has continually lost share to the

>>>> likes

>>>> of Firefox over the last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>> Idiots!!

>>>

>>> Most people use IE because they don't know any better and wrongly think

>>> that IE is secure because MS made it.


>>

>> Where did you get the little tidbit of misinformation? Is that from your

>> linux FUD book?


>

> Common knowledge, something you seriously lack.

>

>>

>> Are you one of them? Just curious,

>>> why do have Avast checking your newsgroup posts and email?


>>

>> You dumb fuck...that is a default setting...it's meaningless.

>> Moron!


>

> LOL! Keep it that way then. Your emails probably aren't worth saving

> anyway.

>


Nervous laugh...again...that means you've been caught lying...again!

>>

>> I hope it

>>> isn't because you think that will make your email and newsgroup posts

>>> safer.

>>>


>> Is that what you think?

>> You are that stupid, aren't you.

>>

>>


>

> No, unlike you, I know what I'm talking about.




No, you're stupid and your arrogance won't let you deal with the truth.

>
 
On 8/3/2010 10:44 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 8/3/2010 7:39 PM, Frank wrote:

>> But you don't have Windows 7 so you really can't be expected to know

>> what you're talking about.


>

> Read my headers. You're lying again, wank.

>


Oh, so you're using one of your "customers" laptops that you "purchased"

for them uh?

Figures.
 
On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

> Boscoe wrote in

> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>

>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> >>>> are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>

>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>

>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>

>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>

>>> Of course.

>>>


>>

>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do

>> you?

>>

>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>> Idiots!!


>

> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>

> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>

> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

> automatically install any updates it finds....

>

> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification as

> to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>

> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

> say....whatever that is.)

>




>






Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the last two

years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its market share to

Firefox. You know people switching to Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you go, or in

your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again established itself as

the ultimate browser by gaining back more than it lost. In-other-words,

now people are switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers

than ever before.



Now, that wasn't hard was it?
 
"Boscoe" wrote in message

news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane...

> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote in

>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>

>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> >>>>> are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>

>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>

>>>> Of course.

>>>>

>>>

>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense, do

>>> you?

>>>

>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>> Idiots!!


>>

>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>

>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>

>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>

>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification as

>> to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>

>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>> say....whatever that is.)

>>


>

>>


>

>

> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the last two

> years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its market share to Firefox.

> You know people switching to Firefox... er... from IE Geddit? Hard to

> imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you go, or in your case there

> you don't. Now IE8 has once again established itself as the ultimate

> browser by gaining back more than it lost. In-other-words, now people are

> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than ever before.

>

> Now, that wasn't hard was it?




Dan will have to print out your explanation and take it to a responsible

adult who can spend the three hours with him so he understands.
 
Boscoe wrote in

news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:



> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote in

>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>

>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> >>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>

>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>

>>>> Of course.

>>>>

>>>

>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>> do you?

>>>

>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>> Idiots!!


>>

>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>

>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>

>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>

>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>

>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>> say....whatever that is.)

>>


>

> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

> go, or in

> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

> more than it lost.




So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

59.75%.......



.....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

60.74%.



(These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)



http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25



This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?



And you call *me* slow ?



You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

understand what the hell you are trying to say.





> In-other-words, now people are

> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

> ever before.

>

> Now, that wasn't hard was it?




To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

he's trying to say ?



Nope.
 
On 08/03/2010 08:02 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:i39jvo$k02$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 08/03/2010 07:30 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:i39jhd$im7$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 08/03/2010 07:15 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>> news:i39h5t$7pa$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:41 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:i39d5v$lb5$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:37 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Tattoo Vampire" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:7fye02htjd6r$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...

>>>>>>>>>> Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> People ditch what they don't like.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Is that why your wife ditched you?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Looks like your head is up your ass again. She didn't ditch me.

>>>>>>>>> Oops.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yeah, she knows no one in their right mind would have anything

>>>>>>>> to do

>>>>>>>> with her except you. You have the same problem. Perfect match.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> This coming from an idiot who has had 4 wives. No a great track

>>>>>>> record

>>>>>>> douche bag.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Jealous? I have also had many girlfriends in between and before the

>>>>>> wives. You, OTOH, married your high school sweetheart and have

>>>>>> lived a

>>>>>> sheltered and boring life. I feel sorry for you.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry but you know nothing. I didn't marry my high school

>>>>> sweetheart but

>>>>> we are still friends to this day. Don't live a boring and sheltered

>>>>> life. Have traveled quite a bit have a nice family and friends. Also

>>>>> have a good job and I'm healthy. Own my house and have a nice car.

>>>>

>>>> Oh, you're a material girl.

>>>

>>> If you call living in a house and owning a car to get to work and play,

>>> then I guess so.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>> Another bonus, I don't use that SHITTY Ubuntu.

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry about your situation. Counting that imaginary $14k a week you

>>>>> claim to get? HA HA HA HA HA

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> My accountant does the counting. So, I have two things you're jealous

>>>> of: my income and my love life. Anything else?

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You're too stupid to count the money? How do you know your accountant is

>>> putting all that money in the bank? Or does your accountant take the

>>> money and purchase drugs for you?

>>>

>>>

>>>


>>

>> He doesn't get to touch one Eur cent. If you go to your bank's web

>> site, you can see how much you have, dumb fuck. I don't deal in cash.

>>

>> --

>> Alias


>

> You don't deal in cash because you don't have any!




You're an idiot.



--

Alias
 
On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

> Boscoe wrote in

> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>

>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>

>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> >>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>> do you?

>>>>

>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>> Idiots!!

>>>

>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>

>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>

>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>

>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>

>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>


>>

>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>> go, or in

>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>> more than it lost.


>

> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

> 59.75%.......

>

> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

> 60.74%.

>

> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>

> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>

> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>

> And you call *me* slow ?

>

> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>

>

>> In-other-words, now people are

>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>> ever before.

>>

>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?


>

> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

> he's trying to say ?

>

> Nope.

>

>




Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

the second month in a row of global gains for



Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

the US.

The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

per cent."



"Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

has been declining ever since."



Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.
 
On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote in

>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>

>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>> do you?

>>>>>

>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>

>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>

>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>

>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>

>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>

>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>

>>>

>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>> go, or in

>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>> more than it lost.


>>

>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>> 59.75%.......

>>

>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>> 60.74%.

>>

>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>

>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>

>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>

>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>

>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>

>>

>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>> ever before.

>>>

>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?


>>

>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>> he's trying to say ?

>>

>> Nope.

>>

>>


>

> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

> the second month in a row of global gains for

>

> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

> the US.

> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

> per cent."

>

> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

> has been declining ever since."

>

> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>




Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.



--

Alias
 
On 8/3/2010 12:38 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 08:02 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:i39jvo$k02$4@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 08/03/2010 07:30 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:i39jhd$im7$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 07:15 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:i39h5t$7pa$3@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:41 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:i39d5v$lb5$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 05:37 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "Tattoo Vampire" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:7fye02htjd6r$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...

>>>>>>>>>>> Pulled Pork wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> People ditch what they don't like.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Is that why your wife ditched you?

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Looks like your head is up your ass again. She didn't ditch me.

>>>>>>>>>> Oops.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she knows no one in their right mind would have anything

>>>>>>>>> to do

>>>>>>>>> with her except you. You have the same problem. Perfect match.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> This coming from an idiot who has had 4 wives. No a great track

>>>>>>>> record

>>>>>>>> douche bag.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Jealous? I have also had many girlfriends in between and before the

>>>>>>> wives. You, OTOH, married your high school sweetheart and have

>>>>>>> lived a

>>>>>>> sheltered and boring life. I feel sorry for you.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry but you know nothing. I didn't marry my high school

>>>>>> sweetheart but

>>>>>> we are still friends to this day. Don't live a boring and sheltered

>>>>>> life. Have traveled quite a bit have a nice family and friends. Also

>>>>>> have a good job and I'm healthy. Own my house and have a nice car.

>>>>>

>>>>> Oh, you're a material girl.

>>>>

>>>> If you call living in a house and owning a car to get to work and play,

>>>> then I guess so.

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> Another bonus, I don't use that SHITTY Ubuntu.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry about your situation. Counting that imaginary $14k a week you

>>>>>> claim to get? HA HA HA HA HA

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> My accountant does the counting. So, I have two things you're jealous

>>>>> of: my income and my love life. Anything else?

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> You're too stupid to count the money? How do you know your

>>>> accountant is

>>>> putting all that money in the bank? Or does your accountant take the

>>>> money and purchase drugs for you?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> He doesn't get to touch one Eur cent. If you go to your bank's web

>>> site, you can see how much you have, dumb fuck. I don't deal in cash.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias


>>

>> You don't deal in cash because you don't have any!


>

> You're an idiot.

>


Projecting again?

Figures!
 
"Alias" wrote in message

news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>

>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>

>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>

>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>

>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>> go, or in

>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>> more than it lost.

>>>

>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>> 59.75%.......

>>>

>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>> 60.74%.

>>>

>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>

>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>

>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>

>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>

>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>

>>>

>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>> ever before.

>>>>

>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>

>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>

>>> Nope.

>>>

>>>


>>

>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>

>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>> the US.

>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>> per cent."

>>

>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>> has been declining ever since."

>>

>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>


>

> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows programs

> that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but more

> securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives even

> cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>

> --

> Alias




So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

fuckwit - That would be all of them!



For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux worth

exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.



Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!
 
On 8/3/2010 1:03 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>

>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>

>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>

>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>

>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>

>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>

>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>> go, or in

>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>> more than it lost.

>>>

>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>> 59.75%.......

>>>

>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>> 60.74%.

>>>

>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>

>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>

>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>

>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>

>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>

>>>

>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>> ever before.

>>>>

>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>

>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>

>>> Nope.

>>>

>>>


>>

>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>

>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>> the US.

>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>> per cent."

>>

>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>> has been declining ever since."

>>

>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>


>

> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

> more securely.




*BULLSHIT*!!!

All anyone need for their computer use is Windows 7...PERIOD!!!

Live with it.



Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.




As if any gives a shit.

>
 
Boscoe wrote in

news:0v_5o.104481$zo4.88730@hurricane:



> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>> Boscoe wrote in

>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>

>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> t- sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>> do you?

>>>>>

>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer,

>>>>> which is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which

>>>>> has continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over

>>>>> the last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>

>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>

>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>

>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>

>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid

>>>> justification as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>

>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>

>>>

>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of

>>> its market share to Firefox. You know people switching

>>> to Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there

>>> you go, or in

>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining

>>> back more than it lost.


>>

>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years,

>> where the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a

>> low of 59.75%.......

>>

>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back

>> to 60.74%.

>>

>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>

>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qpr

>> id= 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>

>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>

>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>

>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't

>> even understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>

>>

>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers

>>> than ever before.

>>>

>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?


>>

>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even

>> know he's trying to say ?

>>

>> Nope.

>>

>>


>

> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global gains

> for




When was the IE share NOT the highest share ?



And you conveniently snipped your claim of.....



"Now IE8 has once again established itself as the ultimate

browser by gaining back more than it lost."



.......which is the stupidity I was attacking.





> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of

> increasing share in the US.

> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per

> cent share of the global browser market during July, up on

> the previous month by 0.4 per cent."




Which is no where near...."Now IE8 has once again established

itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back more than it

lost."



> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59

> per cent and has been declining ever since."




Yes, and who knows what browsers are being used instead of

FF....your claim that all these users are switching back to IE

is bogus.



Since the FF peak, IE use has increased, as well as Chrome,

Opera, and Safari, and 'other' has declined.



To me, or anyone else that can be objective, that doesn't

indicate that users are going back to IE in droves.



> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows

> froupe.




Actually, it's best to be accurate with your information no

matter who you are or what you support.
 


> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global

> leader... "it is the second month in a row of global gains

> for




Other facts......



-IE8 was released in March 2009, which isn't..."Interestingly

IE8 only took 10 months to become the global browser leader."



.......that's going on 17 months, not 10.



-IE8 still doesn't have the Market share IE7 did at the time IE8

was released.



-There are still more users (% wise) of IE6 & IE7 (combined)

than of IE8.







I also fail to see how your little tirade has anything to do

with Linux, as your subject would lead people to believe.



Are you the Usenet version of Fox News ?
 
On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

>

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

>>>>

>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Of course.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

>>>>>>> do you?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

>>>>>>> Idiots!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

>>>>> go, or in

>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

>>>>> more than it lost.

>>>>

>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

>>>> 59.75%.......

>>>>

>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

>>>> 60.74%.

>>>>

>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

>>>>

>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

>>>>

>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

>>>>

>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

>>>>

>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

>>>>> ever before.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

>>>>

>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

>>>> he's trying to say ?

>>>>

>>>> Nope.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "it is

>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

>>>

>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing share in

>>> the US.

>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent share of

>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by 0.4

>>> per cent."

>>>

>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

>>> has been declining ever since."

>>>

>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

>>>


>>

>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

>>

>> --

>> Alias


>

> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

> fuckwit - That would be all of them!




Wrong.



>

> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux worth

> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.




Wrong.



>

> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!




You're an idiot.



--

Alias
 
Back
Top