The WTF Starts Now

[Charlie Tame]

The poster formerly known as Nina Di Boy wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think Frank *is* Steve Ballmer.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> I will consider that as a real compliment!
>> Thank you.
>> Frank
>
> Oh come on now Frank, you must at least be a better dancer than him!
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4860483760049380308
>
>


I figured it was some manifestation of a little known programming method
like "Mouse Gestures" but more geared toward sheep

 

[Charlie Tame]

Gary wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
> news:eyh83gSyHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Frank wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and over
>>>>>>>> 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> False and false.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last 10
>>>>>>>> years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an arm and
>>>>>>> a leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better and free. Too
>>>>>>> bad, baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who does
>>>>>> real work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Truer words were never spoken!
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> Course neither of you dare to say what "real work" is and can only
>>>> snootily sneer at Open Source. Jealousy usually works that way.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> There is a reality that you linux lovers are simply not willing or are
>>> unable to accept and that is that linux is not a main stream business os
>>> capable of running most "real world" productive software. And please,
>>> don't tell me about wine or emulators. We've been thru diatribe with you
>>> guys many times before and nothing, absolutely nothing, has changed. You
>>> still can't run most major software applications on linux...period! The
>>> software applications most business need and use on a daily basis will
>>> not run on linux. Linux has some applications that are "almost" similar,
>>> but "almost" won't cut it in the "real" business world.
>>> Sorry!
>>> You may think in your mind that is will but in the "real" world (a place
>>> you don't seem to be a part of) it really doesn't run the type of
>>> software most (90+ %) of all business need to run in order to be
>>> productive.
>>>
>>> Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel good
>>> because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know it
>>> doesn't.
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> And the real work is? And the software programs are?
>>
>> Alias, not holding his breath
>
> Remote manage 10 domains - Policies for updates for 2000+ machines - Auto
> install or deinstall software.
> Local administration groups - Remote management - and this is just the
> management part.
> I'm not going to get into interoperability as it would be way over your
> head. So I'm waiting for your answer to the above.
>
>


Yes, a lot of corporate job creation can be achieved by taking a simple
job description and making it sound difficult After all "Windows"
does make it easy, doesn't it?

 

[Charlie Tame]

Frank wrote:
> MICHAEL wrote:
>
>> * Frank:
>>
>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer
>>>>> in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux
>>>>> free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>
>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>
>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>> moving right along.
>>
>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>
>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a shame.
>>
>>
>> -Michael
>
> So you're finding it difficult to see an ideological connection between
> atheism, communism and the free software connection?
> Try harder...it's hiding in plain site.
> Frank
>


Your delusions unfortunately are not hiding nearly as well.

 

[Charlie Tame]

MICHAEL wrote:
> * Frank:
>> MICHAEL wrote:
>>
>>> * Frank:
>>>
>>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>>>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>>>>>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>>>>>> software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>>>>>> atheist or communist do you?
>>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
>>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>>> Frank
>>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>>
>>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>>> moving right along.
>>>
>>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>>
>>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a shame.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Michael
>> So you're finding it difficult to see an ideological connection between
>> atheism, communism and the free software connection?
>> Try harder...it's hiding in plain site.
>> Frank
>
> Are you serious? Who cares? A few goobers, maybe.
>
> Windows or Linux, it's all just fukkin software... that's it.
>
> Gawd dam, I reckon I can get a bit excited about tech crap
> at times- but, some of you freaks really need to get a fukkin life.
>
>
> -Michael


Hehe, what, and miss all this "Excitement" ???

Who? Me stir the sh*t? Now, would I do a thing like that?

 

[Charlie Tame]

Tim Judd wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>> I've been working with computer system long before you knew what a
>>>>> computer was.
>>>> Really? The first time I operated a computer was in 1968. Remember
>>>> punch cards?
>>>
>>> Yes I was working on HP 3000, Data General 1200, and Univac 1108
>>> systems with punch card readers.
>>> Also desiging hardware and software during that time.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I've been playing with different versions of Linux and Ubuntu since
>>>>> it first came out.
>>>>> Its still a toy for a desktop OS always has been always will be.
>>>> What can Windows do that Ubuntu can't do besides accuse you of
>>>> piracy, play games requiring DX and attract viruses and malware?
>>>
>>> Interoperate with businesss software packages and do real work
>>
>> And "real work" being?
>
> Anything NOT websurfing, email, or word processing/spreadsheets.
> Proprietary executables in use. DOS executables that windows can/has
> been backwards compatable since '95 (working on 12 years now). Linux
> may have been around in the same timeframe, but hasn't progressed
> anywhere. Nowhere. Still like it was first released.
>
> I'm so VERY tempted to paste my URL to my linux rant here, but if this
> is OT, my rant will not only start a flame war, it will get many people
> blacklisted on many people's newsreading client. I won't do it. Just
> understand the general feel is that Linux isn't ready for any mainstream
> use, and I don't ever see it being ready. Others, such as Apple, can
> take it over and remove the less popular systems like Linux. Otherwise
> on this thread, there are numbers posted that linux is about 1% internet
> market share. Apple's passed linux up a long time ago. I promote Apple
> and will physically harm people who advocate linux, if I have access to
> them.
>
>>>>> There has been no significant changes in years and you know it.
>>>> I've seen a significant change from Ubuntu 6.06 to 7.04.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And no real change in the number of users. Several companys have
>>> offered systems with Linux and dropped it because nobody wanted it.
>>
>> Companies ... companies. I like it better than XP or Vista I am somebody.
>
> No you're not. you're still a number.. lumped in with the rest of the
> linux advocates. You aren't making yourself unique, you're just another
> linux advocate that doesn't understand the real business world that
> needs to deal with the rest of the business world.
>
> Run Microsoft Word 2007 on your Ubuntu natively, without any API
> emulators or virtualization and you would have a point, maybe.
>
>>>>> Insert your FUD here.
>>>> YOU insert it. Yuck!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ya right. Grow up.
>>
>> No sense of humor, eh? I guess you've been doing too much "real work".
>
> You have no sense of real-world interoperability.
>
> I don't know what country you live in, but in the US, each governmental
> state offices send out documents in Microsoft format to regional
> governmental agencies, and expect a response in Microsoft format.
> Including archives that are packed up, and distributed in a
> self-extracting (maybe proprietary compression) files. Run the .exe
> natively. Try it.


So you basically claim then that without Microsoft Word 2007 the known
universe will grind to a screeching halt.

Perhaps the Government usage of Microsoft Word and related products
explains the regular leakage of supposedly confidential info from
Government departments

> http://www.computerbytesman.com/privacy/blair.htm

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to
>>>>>>>>> join religious cults.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the
>>>>>>>> free software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for
>>>>>>>> some time (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being
>>>>>>>> an atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr.
>>>>>> Ballmer in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the
>>>>>> linux free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I vote democratic and don't believe in a god. I do believe in cause
>>>>> and effect. Do you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> heheh...sure and which party in spain do you align yourself with?
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't vote in Spain as I am not a Spanish citizen (I have residency
>>> due to being married to a Spanish lady). I vote in the US
>>> presidential elections and vote democratic. Although there is a very
>>> small communist party in Spain, I wouldn't vote for them if I could
>>> vote here.
>>>
>>> So, that just leaves you god to go on about.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> I asked you which political party in spain you align yourself with,
>> not vote for.
>> Also which atheist group do you support?
>> What is the URL to your supposed web site?
>> Well...?
>> Frank
>
>
>
> The point of being an atheist is that you are not forced to support ANY
> group, and that also enables one to express an unbiased opinion based
> upon observation rather than upon some philosophical dogma.

hahaha...give it up charlie, you've already lost that argument before it
even begun.
Frank

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:

> MICHAEL wrote:
>
>> * Frank:
>>
>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer
>>>>> in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux
>>>>> free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>
>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>
>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>> moving right along.
>>
>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>
>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a shame.
>>
>>
>> -Michael
>
>
>
> Speaking of which, hey, that DVD worked on my older Asus and got 1024 X
> 768 so O was pleased with that - a couple of the games wouldn't work and
> the ones that did were very slow frame rate which may have been due to
> the drive or something, no time to study. They obviously put in a lot of
> hard work and it looks very professional.
>
> As to this "Professional Software" kick Frank seems to be on does the
> really think that only Microsoft products are professionally written?

Of course not!
Only a penciled neck geek or a new orleans pimp would harbor such a
stupid thought?
Are you from no?
Frank

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:

> The poster formerly known as Nina Di Boy wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite
>>>>>> easily.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think Frank *is* Steve Ballmer.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> I will consider that as a real compliment!
>>> Thank you.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Oh come on now Frank, you must at least be a better dancer than him!
>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4860483760049380308
>>
>>
>
>
> I figured it was some manifestation of a little known programming method
> like "Mouse Gestures" but more geared toward sheep

Oh, so you were only "helping" that sheep over the fence?
hahahaha...lol!
Frank

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> MICHAEL wrote:
>>
>>> * Frank:
>>>
>>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to
>>>>>>>>> join religious cults.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the
>>>>>>>> free software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for
>>>>>>>> some time (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being
>>>>>>>> an atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr.
>>>>>> Ballmer in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the
>>>>>> linux free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept
>>>> that!
>>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>>
>>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>>> moving right along.
>>>
>>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>>
>>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a
>>> shame.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>
>>
>> So you're finding it difficult to see an ideological connection
>> between atheism, communism and the free software connection?
>> Try harder...it's hiding in plain site.
>> Frank
>>
>
>
> Your delusions unfortunately are not hiding nearly as well.

Sh*t, you didn't even have to duck to miss that one, huh?
Frank

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:

> Gary wrote:
>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:eyh83gSyHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and
>>>>>>>>> over 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False and false.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last
>>>>>>>>> 10 years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an
>>>>>>>> arm and a leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better
>>>>>>>> and free. Too bad, baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who
>>>>>>> does real work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truer words were never spoken!
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Course neither of you dare to say what "real work" is and can only
>>>>> snootily sneer at Open Source. Jealousy usually works that way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> There is a reality that you linux lovers are simply not willing or
>>>> are unable to accept and that is that linux is not a main stream
>>>> business os capable of running most "real world" productive
>>>> software. And please, don't tell me about wine or emulators. We've
>>>> been thru diatribe with you guys many times before and nothing,
>>>> absolutely nothing, has changed. You still can't run most major
>>>> software applications on linux...period! The software applications
>>>> most business need and use on a daily basis will not run on linux.
>>>> Linux has some applications that are "almost" similar, but "almost"
>>>> won't cut it in the "real" business world.
>>>> Sorry!
>>>> You may think in your mind that is will but in the "real" world (a
>>>> place you don't seem to be a part of) it really doesn't run the type
>>>> of software most (90+ %) of all business need to run in order to be
>>>> productive.
>>>>
>>>> Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel
>>>> good because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know
>>>> it doesn't.
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And the real work is? And the software programs are?
>>>
>>> Alias, not holding his breath
>>
>>
>> Remote manage 10 domains - Policies for updates for 2000+ machines -
>> Auto install or deinstall software.
>> Local administration groups - Remote management - and this is just the
>> management part.
>> I'm not going to get into interoperability as it would be way over
>> your head. So I'm waiting for your answer to the above.
>>
>
>
> Yes, a lot of corporate job creation can be achieved by taking a simple
> job description and making it sound difficult After all "Windows"
> does make it easy, doesn't it?

hahaha...only "if" you know what you're doing!
Frank

 

[Charlie Tame]

Tim Judd wrote:

> Sending/receiving email IS NOT real work.

My Senator just communicated with me using email. Wonder if he knows
he's not really working?

> Web surfing IS NOT real work

I just bought some stuff for work at www.grainger.com, without which I
cannot proceed with tomorrow's assignment. Their store was closed but my
parts will be waiting for me in the morning. That's not work?

> Word processing,

Have you told Stephen King he doesn;t work for a living?

spreadsheets IS NOT real work.

Wonder how Alan Greenspan does all that financial stuff then?

Creating/Editing images
> IS NOT real work.


So all those Pixar Disney things aren't about making money then, it's
just for the dun of it is it?


> IM IS NOT real work.

It is if you are a member of congress apparently, though I am not
surprised nobody admits to that one.

VoIP is a protocol/technology, not "work" in my eyes.


It finds a lot of income for Vonage, and Mediacom and QWest...

>> Can one easily get a virus with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.
>
> Note: I kept your original line intact, no changes. I made the minor
> change of excluding 'easily' in the statements below.

Of course there's malware why take out the "Easily", because when you
look it's not so easy right?

>> Can one easily get malware with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.
>
> WRONG.
>
> Tracking cookies are considered malware. You get malware with any
> Internet-connected machine and a WWW browser.

Actually cookies aren't mentioned below...

>
> "malware" is defined as:
>
> "software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the
> owner's informed consent" (wikipedia.com)
> "any code, program, script, software or any instructions interpreted as
> attacking a computer operating system (most probably a Windows operating
> system). Malware includes spyware, trojans, viruses/virii, denial of
> service/DoS attacks." (urbandictionary.com)
> "Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer
> functions or sends personal data about the user to unauthorized parties
> over the Internet." (dictionary.com)
>
> I think dictionary.com has it nailed best.
>
>> Is everything updated at once with Ubuntu? Yes. With Windows? No.


You may have some leverage with this one as "Everything" is a pretty
tall order...


> Microsoft provides updates in one place for everything Microsoft
> (Windows, Office...). But doesn't update 3rd party software such as
> Mozilla software, or any governmental agency. Neither does BSD,
> directly. You still obtain updates in BSD, but not through the OS's own
> servers.
>
>> Does one have to constantly prove that one is not a pirate over and
>> over again with Ubuntu? No. With Windows Vista? You betcha.
>
> http://www.linuxgenuineadvantage.org/


But on this you again lose miserably.


> You're comparing bananas to oranges (I did not want to use the
> 'Apples[1] to Oranges' comparison).
>
> Linux wants everyone to share it. Microsoft wants only the people who
> have legally paid for a license to use it. This is an unfair
> comparison. You should drop this immediately, permanently.


Drop it because you have no answer to it? I personally (Several times
now) have been greatly inconvenienced by this crap, and my employer, all
of us using genuine Windows under the proper terms and conditions.

Nobody minds Microsoft protecting their rights at all, but this practice
hurts and pisses off their real customers while the pirates suffer
nothing.


>> Alias
>
> Mull this information over, Alias. You aren't entirely right.
>
> [1] http://www.apple.com/


He's less wrong than you are

 

[Charlie Tame]

Tim Judd wrote:
> Adam Albright wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:23:28 -0600, Tim Judd <tjudd01@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Word processing, spreadsheets IS NOT real work. Creating/Editing
>>> images IS NOT real work.
>>
>> Oh I see, whatever other people do on their computer isn't real work,
>> but you playing nurse maid is real work. Got it. thanks for sharing.
>>
>
> If Alias can define what is real work, so can I.
>
> I'm sorry I missed this point in my previous post.


You obviously missed quite a lot, maybe time to give up eh?

 

[Adam Albright]

On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:13:32 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamm.cmm> wrote:

>Charlie Tame wrote:

>> Yes, a lot of corporate job creation can be achieved by taking a simple
>> job description and making it sound difficult After all "Windows"
>> does make it easy, doesn't it?
>
>hahaha...only "if" you know what you're doing!

Which Frank has confirmed he doesn't know, not even close, since it
was our little Frankie that proudly announced to this forum it "only"
took him and consultants six months to figure out Vista so he could
use it in his "business". Priceless!

How long did it take you to get potty trained Frankie, till your 10th
birthday?

 

[Charlie Tame]

Frank wrote:
> Charlie Tame wrote:
>
>> MICHAEL wrote:
>>
>>> * Frank:
>>>
>>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to
>>>>>>>>> join religious cults.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the
>>>>>>>> free software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for
>>>>>>>> some time (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being
>>>>>>>> an atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr.
>>>>>> Ballmer in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the
>>>>>> linux free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept
>>>> that!
>>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>>
>>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>>> moving right along.
>>>
>>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>>
>>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a
>>> shame.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> Speaking of which, hey, that DVD worked on my older Asus and got 1024
>> X 768 so O was pleased with that - a couple of the games wouldn't work
>> and the ones that did were very slow frame rate which may have been
>> due to the drive or something, no time to study. They obviously put in
>> a lot of hard work and it looks very professional.
>>
>> As to this "Professional Software" kick Frank seems to be on does the
>> really think that only Microsoft products are professionally written?
>
> Of course not!
> Only a penciled neck geek or a new orleans pimp would harbor such a
> stupid thought?
> Are you from no?
> Frank


Are you trying to suggest that everyone from New Orleans is a "Pimp" Frank?

 

[Charlie Tame]

Adam Albright wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:13:32 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamm.cmm> wrote:
>
>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>
>>> Yes, a lot of corporate job creation can be achieved by taking a simple
>>> job description and making it sound difficult After all "Windows"
>>> does make it easy, doesn't it?
>> hahaha...only "if" you know what you're doing!
>
> Which Frank has confirmed he doesn't know, not even close, since it
> was our little Frankie that proudly announced to this forum it "only"
> took him and consultants six months to figure out Vista so he could
> use it in his "business". Priceless!
>
> How long did it take you to get potty trained Frankie, till your 10th
> birthday?
>

Ah that explains the bad temper - diaper rash...

 

[Lang Murphy]

"Mike" <no@where.man> wrote in message
news:no-4DFF5A.09545717072007@news.supernews.com...
> In article <#PQAWcHyHHA.1176@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>,
> Alias <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
>
>> Another Windows fan who can't respond to content and can only hurl the
>> same, tired and unfounded insults.
>
> Another Linux marketing droid who doesn't understand that this is a
> Windows group and no one gives a crap about Linux or "free software".
>
> Mike


I both agree and disagree. Alias is a Ubuntu troll who refuses to admit that
his OT, constant, day-in, day-out, posts about Ubuntu in -this- ng make him
a troll. And I -do- give a crap about nix... if a distro ever shows up that
"works" for me, I'll happily run it on one of my boxes here. Right next to
one of my Vista boxes. ;-) (I need to D/L and install PCLinuxOS... as I told
another poster, in another thread, I would... haven't gotten around to it
yet...)

Lang

 

[Tim Judd]

Charlie Tame wrote:
> Tim Judd wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>> I've been working with computer system long before you knew what a
>>>>>> computer was.
>>>>> Really? The first time I operated a computer was in 1968. Remember
>>>>> punch cards?
>>>>
>>>> Yes I was working on HP 3000, Data General 1200, and Univac 1108
>>>> systems with punch card readers.
>>>> Also desiging hardware and software during that time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I've been playing with different versions of Linux and Ubuntu
>>>>>> since it first came out.
>>>>>> Its still a toy for a desktop OS always has been always will be.
>>>>> What can Windows do that Ubuntu can't do besides accuse you of
>>>>> piracy, play games requiring DX and attract viruses and malware?
>>>>
>>>> Interoperate with businesss software packages and do real work
>>>
>>> And "real work" being?
>>
>> Anything NOT websurfing, email, or word processing/spreadsheets.
>> Proprietary executables in use. DOS executables that windows can/has
>> been backwards compatable since '95 (working on 12 years now). Linux
>> may have been around in the same timeframe, but hasn't progressed
>> anywhere. Nowhere. Still like it was first released.
>>
>> I'm so VERY tempted to paste my URL to my linux rant here, but if this
>> is OT, my rant will not only start a flame war, it will get many
>> people blacklisted on many people's newsreading client. I won't do
>> it. Just understand the general feel is that Linux isn't ready for
>> any mainstream use, and I don't ever see it being ready. Others, such
>> as Apple, can take it over and remove the less popular systems like
>> Linux. Otherwise on this thread, there are numbers posted that linux
>> is about 1% internet market share. Apple's passed linux up a long
>> time ago. I promote Apple and will physically harm people who
>> advocate linux, if I have access to them.
>>
>>>>>> There has been no significant changes in years and you know it.
>>>>> I've seen a significant change from Ubuntu 6.06 to 7.04.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And no real change in the number of users. Several companys have
>>>> offered systems with Linux and dropped it because nobody wanted it.
>>>
>>> Companies ... companies. I like it better than XP or Vista I am
>>> somebody.
>>
>> No you're not. you're still a number.. lumped in with the rest of
>> the linux advocates. You aren't making yourself unique, you're just
>> another linux advocate that doesn't understand the real business world
>> that needs to deal with the rest of the business world.
>>
>> Run Microsoft Word 2007 on your Ubuntu natively, without any API
>> emulators or virtualization and you would have a point, maybe.
>>
>>>>>> Insert your FUD here.
>>>>> YOU insert it. Yuck!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ya right. Grow up.
>>>
>>> No sense of humor, eh? I guess you've been doing too much "real work".
>>
>> You have no sense of real-world interoperability.
>>
>> I don't know what country you live in, but in the US, each
>> governmental state offices send out documents in Microsoft format to
>> regional governmental agencies, and expect a response in Microsoft
>> format. Including archives that are packed up, and distributed in a
>> self-extracting (maybe proprietary compression) files. Run the .exe
>> natively. Try it.
>
>
> So you basically claim then that without Microsoft Word 2007 the known
> universe will grind to a screeching halt.
>
> Perhaps the Government usage of Microsoft Word and related products
> explains the regular leakage of supposedly confidential info from
> Government departments

No, you're taking it wrong.

There's "You" who's running Linux, and "Them"/"They" who are running
Windows.

They send You a document in Microsoft format and then They expect a
Micorosoft format back from You.. That's all I'm saying.

IOW, I loan you $10, and receive 1000 pennies back as the loan payment.
It's not what they expected.

>> http://www.computerbytesman.com/privacy/blair.htm
>

 

[Tim Judd]

Charlie, you are missing the boat entirely. As I said previously, if
one person can define "work" so can I.

I wish to amend my original post by saying "Not All...."[2]

Charlie Tame wrote:
> Tim Judd wrote:
>
>> Sending/receiving email IS NOT real work.
>
> My Senator just communicated with me using email. Wonder if he knows
> he's not really working?
>
>> Web surfing IS NOT real work
>
> I just bought some stuff for work at www.grainger.com, without which I
> cannot proceed with tomorrow's assignment. Their store was closed but my
> parts will be waiting for me in the morning. That's not work?

[2] web surfing is work. Do you visit grainger.com ONLY, never go to
ebay.com? What about google groups? Are ebay.com or google group
visits work?

>> Word processing,
>
> Have you told Stephen King he doesn;t work for a living?

[2] word processing is work. Stephen King doesn't participate here (no
search results revealed his name)

> spreadsheets IS NOT real work.
>
> Wonder how Alan Greenspan does all that financial stuff then?

[2] spreadsheets is work. Alan Greenspan does a lot of work with
something, are you sure it's spreadsheets? Maybe a enterprise database
with sql queries might be doing his work.

> Creating/Editing images
>> IS NOT real work.
>
>
> So all those Pixar Disney things aren't about making money then, it's
> just for the dun of it is it?

[2] Creating/Editing images are work. You're providing excellent
examples, but I don't think you're in the same context as I.

>> IM IS NOT real work.
>
> It is if you are a member of congress apparently, though I am not
> surprised nobody admits to that one.

[2] IM is work.

> VoIP is a protocol/technology, not "work" in my eyes.
>
>
> It finds a lot of income for Vonage, and Mediacom and QWest...

That's a business, I don't work for them, do you? If no, then it's not
work for you. Vonage, Mediacom (who I've never heard of) and Qwest are
service providers. VoIP itself is still not something someone does.

>>> Can one easily get a virus with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.
>>
>> Note: I kept your original line intact, no changes. I made the minor
>> change of excluding 'easily' in the statements below.
>
> Of course there's malware why take out the "Easily", because when you
> look it's not so easy right?

You omitted some of my original post without commenting or notifying
it's omitted.

I took out easily because hackers won't halfway infect a system. They
do everything they can to get in and infect the system. Note that that
"do everything they can" is including code exploits in 3rd party software.

>>> Can one easily get malware with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.
>>
>> WRONG.
>>
>> Tracking cookies are considered malware. You get malware with any
>> Internet-connected machine and a WWW browser.
>
> Actually cookies aren't mentioned below...

The word cookies doesn't need to be mentioned. All items are covered
under "any code."

>>
>> "malware" is defined as:
>>
>> "software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without
>> the owner's informed consent" (wikipedia.com)
>> "any code, program, script, software or any instructions interpreted
>> as attacking a computer operating system (most probably a Windows
>> operating system). Malware includes spyware, trojans, viruses/virii,
>> denial of service/DoS attacks." (urbandictionary.com)
>> "Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer
>> functions or sends personal data about the user to unauthorized
>> parties over the Internet." (dictionary.com)
>>
>> I think dictionary.com has it nailed best.
>>
>>> Is everything updated at once with Ubuntu? Yes. With Windows? No.
>
>
> You may have some leverage with this one as "Everything" is a pretty
> tall order...

It is, but that's how Linux distributions work.

>> Microsoft provides updates in one place for everything Microsoft
>> (Windows, Office...). But doesn't update 3rd party software such as
>> Mozilla software, or any governmental agency. Neither does BSD,
>> directly. You still obtain updates in BSD, but not through the OS's
>> own servers.
>>
>>> Does one have to constantly prove that one is not a pirate over and
>>> over again with Ubuntu? No. With Windows Vista? You betcha.
>>
>> http://www.linuxgenuineadvantage.org/
>
> But on this you again lose miserably.

You don't explain. linuxgenuineadvantage.org is a joke. Much like
Windows Genuine Advantage is considered a joke.

>> You're comparing bananas to oranges (I did not want to use the
>> 'Apples[1] to Oranges' comparison).
>>
>> Linux wants everyone to share it. Microsoft wants only the people who
>> have legally paid for a license to use it. This is an unfair
>> comparison. You should drop this immediately, permanently.
>
> Drop it because you have no answer to it? I personally (Several times
> now) have been greatly inconvenienced by this crap, and my employer, all
> of us using genuine Windows under the proper terms and conditions.

"no answer"? I see myself being quoted there. I did have an answer:
"Linux wants everyone to share it. Microsoft wants only the people who
have legally paid for a license to use it."

> Nobody minds Microsoft protecting their rights at all, but this practice
> hurts and pisses off their real customers while the pirates suffer nothing.

I have a feeling you're making an argument to my post on this statement,
but I fail to see it. If it's simply a statement,

A) I expect it, as should all other software developers
B) The pirates seem to know the software better than the original
software developers. And the original software developers haven't
released the code. The original developers made a loose model work, and
allowing outside influence to affect it's result for the hackers to work
around it.

>>> Alias
>>
>> Mull this information over, Alias. You aren't entirely right.
>>
>> [1] http://www.apple.com/
>
>
> He's less wrong than you are

And you're taking a side of things I hadn't yet thought about. That's
the beauty of open discussion forums like this.

I agree, I thought very hard in composing my original post, but I missed
some point of views and other things.

And I still don't think I'm entirely wrong on anything.

 

[Frank]

Charlie Tame wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>
>>> MICHAEL wrote:
>>>
>>>> * Frank:
>>>>
>>>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to
>>>>>>>>>> join religious cults.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the
>>>>>>>>> free software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for
>>>>>>>>> some time (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being
>>>>>>>>> an atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr.
>>>>>>> Ballmer in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit
>>>>>>> the linux free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept
>>>>> that!
>>>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship,
>>>>> RS.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>>>
>>>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>>>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>>>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>>>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>>>> moving right along.
>>>>
>>>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>>>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>>>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>>>
>>>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>>>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a
>>>> shame.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, hey, that DVD worked on my older Asus and got 1024
>>> X 768 so O was pleased with that - a couple of the games wouldn't
>>> work and the ones that did were very slow frame rate which may have
>>> been due to the drive or something, no time to study. They obviously
>>> put in a lot of hard work and it looks very professional.
>>>
>>> As to this "Professional Software" kick Frank seems to be on does the
>>> really think that only Microsoft products are professionally written?
>>
>>
>> Of course not!
>> Only a penciled neck geek or a new orleans pimp would harbor such a
>> stupid thought?
>> Are you from no?
>> Frank
>
>
>
> Are you trying to suggest that everyone from New Orleans is a "Pimp" Frank?

Well gosh darn no charlie...is that what you're suggesting?
Frank

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:13:32 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamm.cmm> wrote:
>
>
>>Charlie Tame wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Yes, a lot of corporate job creation can be achieved by taking a simple
>>>job description and making it sound difficult After all "Windows"
>>>does make it easy, doesn't it?
>>
>>hahaha...only "if" you know what you're doing!
>
>
> Which Frank has confirmed he doesn't know, not even close, since it
> was our little Frankie that proudly announced to this forum it "only"
> took him and consultants six months to figure out Vista so he could
> use it in his "business". Priceless!
>
> How long did it take you to get potty trained Frankie, till your 10th
> birthday?
>

Damned, if you're not stinkin, slobbering, lying drunk again!
hahaha...give it up mr genius, cause for sure, it'll be you're undoing.
Frank