The WTF Starts Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter Test User
  • Start date Start date
Adam Albright wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:42:01 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>
>
>>Alias wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I don't consider Linux a cause.

>>
>>Then why are you treating it as such?

>
>
> Why do you defend Microsoft?
>


Point out where I've defended MS against true, factual acquisitions ok?
Also I'm not some fanatical zealot trolling in an ng whose products I
don't even have promoting some other product.
Only real trolls do that.
Now prove your accusation or STFU (I love to do say don't you?).
Frank
 
"Frank" <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote in message
news:%23xtpn2WyHHA.3768@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't consider Linux a cause.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then why are you treating it as such?

>>
>>
>> I'm not.
>>

>
> Liar! No more lies loser!
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have any heroes. I simply like
>>>
>>>> it better than Windows.
>>>
>>>
>>> You're in a Vista ng and you don't have Vista yet you constantly promote
>>> linux (public service...yeah right...hahahaha...ROTFL).

>>
>>
>> You liked that, eh?

>
> Hey jerk, it's your "cause" as we've all said.
> You worship linux, no denying it now!
>>
>>> Sorry pal, but that's considered a "cause" in anyone's book.

>>
>>
>> No, in YOUR book.
>>

>
> I don't have a book.
> Your actions in this ng speak much louder than any of your lying words
> ever could!
>
>>>>
>>>> "A question in your nerves is lit
>>>> Yet you know there is no answer fit to satisfy
>>>> Insure you not to quit
>>>> To keep it in your mind and not fergit
>>>> That it is not he or she or them or it
>>>> That you belong to."
>>>
>>>
>>> You need to quote source and give credit as per copyright laws.
>>> Otherwise it's called plagiarism.
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>> Sue me.
>>

>
> So you've stooped to being a liar, a cheat and now a you're an admitted
> thief.
> Well, well, well...how predictable an asrehole are you.
> Frank


Frank, Alias is a looser. He has nothing but 'child like' answers. It's
kind of like pushing a car with a rope. Save your breath.
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:24:43 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:33:41 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>What is it about "none of your business" that you don't understand?
>>>>
>>>>Alias
>>>
>>>What are you so afraid of?
>>>Post the URL or STFU...lol!
>>>Frank

>>
>>
>> Where's YOUR web site Frankie, that ought to be worth a hoot and a
>> half.
>>
>> Put up or shut-up.
>>

>
>Sorry doris, we have no need for a web site.
>How about your web site.


So damn funny, that's Frankie! You claim to run a marketing company
and yet don't have a web site.

That's like a prostitute not having condoms with her.

Frankie is as phony as a three dollar bill.

So all those servers you claim to have do what?
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:35:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:42:01 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I don't consider Linux a cause.
>>>
>>>Then why are you treating it as such?

>>
>>
>> Why do you defend Microsoft?
>>

>
>Point out where I've defended MS against true, factual acquisitions ok?
>Also I'm not some fanatical zealot trolling in an ng whose products I
>don't even have promoting some other product.
>Only real trolls do that.
>Now prove your accusation or STFU (I love to do say don't you?).
>Frank


No, I love to expose you as the obvious phony you are.
 
Adam Albright wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:35:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>
>
>>Adam Albright wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:42:01 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I don't consider Linux a cause.
>>>>
>>>>Then why are you treating it as such?
>>>
>>>
>>>Why do you defend Microsoft?
>>>

>>
>>Point out where I've defended MS against true, factual acquisitions ok?
>>Also I'm not some fanatical zealot trolling in an ng whose products I
>>don't even have promoting some other product.
>>Only real trolls do that.
>>Now prove your accusation or STFU (I love to do say don't you?).
>>Frank

>
>
> No, I love to expose you as the obvious phony you are.
>


The only thing you're exposing is your inability to backup your
pointless accusations.
So STFU...hahaha...you just gotta love it!
Frank
 
Adam Albright wrote:


>
> So damn funny, that's Frankie! You claim to run a marketing company
> and yet don't have a web site.
>


Yeah we have a marketing/advertising agency. Our portfolio and existing
clients speak for us. Plus some of the printers we use actually use some
of our work in their portfolios. We accept only referrals. That's much
better than some glitzy web site.
We've very good at what we do.

> That's like a prostitute not having condoms with her.


Oh, so you frequent prostitutes huh? Well, that's your problem not mine.

>
> Frankie is as phony as a three dollar bill.


Well, lets just think about things for a moment. You're the one claiming
to have an iq of 170 (yeah right!). You're the one claiming to have
"retired" at 40 yrs. You're the one claiming to be a computer genius yet
you can't fix your on computer.
Now who's the phony?
>
> So all those servers you claim to have do what?


Servers? Sorry pal, now you're starting to lie and that won't work.
We have one server, WHS, that replaced Server 2003, and backs up all
important work on a daily basis.
You need to get a real life cause it's apparent the one you currently
have isn't working.
Frank
>
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:20:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>> No, I love to expose you as the obvious phony you are.


>The only thing you're exposing is your inability to backup your
>pointless accusations.


Actually that would be YOU making pointless accusations. How many
times have you called me a drunk now, Twenty time, fifty?

Then there's you calling everybody you argue with a troll, loser,
idiot, whatever pops into your feeble little mind.

You inability is to face reality is you main problem. You are your own
worst enemy and prove what a dope you are all by yourself day after
day.
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:33:58 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:


>> So damn funny, that's Frankie! You claim to run a marketing company
>> and yet don't have a web site.


>Yeah we have a marketing/advertising agency. Our portfolio and existing
>clients speak for us.


We only hear YOU bragging.

>Plus some of the printers we use actually use some
>of our work in their portfolios. We accept only referrals. That's much
>better than some glitzy web site.
>We've very good at what we do.


So good you keep it hidden. Got it. Thanks for sharing. <snicker>
>
>> That's like a prostitute not having condoms with her.

>
>Oh, so you frequent prostitutes huh? Well, that's your problem not mine.


Another feeble Frankie attempt to twist what I actually said.

>> Frankie is as phony as a three dollar bill.

>
>Well, lets just think about things for a moment. You're the one claiming
>to have an iq of 170 (yeah right!). You're the one claiming to have
>"retired" at 40 yrs. You're the one claiming to be a computer genius yet
>you can't fix your on computer.
>Now who's the phony?


You just repeated the same lies you have dozens of times before. That
only proves you can't even come up with an original insult. How
pathetic is that?

>> So all those servers you claim to have do what?

>
>Servers? Sorry pal, now you're starting to lie and that won't work.
>We have one server, WHS, that replaced Server 2003, and backs up all
>important work on a daily basis.


In other words you have no server. A "server" is a computer that
serves up web pages. Since you admitted you have no web pages, you
therefore have no web server, obviously none of your own, not even
rented space. LOL! Some marketing company.

You don't even know the jargon. Frankie, you're such a dope. WHS is
just software, and Microsoft crap. Big freaking deal. What a phony.

I can't think of anybody that would consider the crap that comes out
your mouth as important. You mean you "save" the crap you post here?

Priceless!
 
In article <uVHkq2UyHHA.5024@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>,
Alias <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:

> Mike wrote:
> > In article <e6itZkTyHHA.4640@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
> > Alias <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote:
> >
> >> Head. Sand. You've never tried Ubuntu because you're biased.

> >
> > Head. Ass.
> >
> > Get over it. You're just upset because someone doesn't like your
> > favorite OS.
> >
> > I *have* tried it. I just was not impressed.

>
> You said you didn't. Which is it?


No, I never said that. I said I couldn't *install* it in VPC. But I
did use the Live CD for a couple of days.

Learn how to read.

Mike
 
"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:4evs93d98m4buuje59027rmch2f5c3iam4@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:33:58 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
> In other words you have no server. A "server" is a computer that
> serves up web pages.


...snip

SAY WHAT???????

Wow you don't know sh*t!!!!!!!!!
 
* Frank:
> MICHAEL wrote:
>
>> * Frank:
>>
>>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>
>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>>>>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>>>>> software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>>>>> atheist or communist do you?
>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank
>>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
>>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>>> Frank

>>
>> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>>
>> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
>> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
>> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
>> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
>> moving right along.
>>
>> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
>> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
>> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>>
>> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
>> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a shame.
>>
>>
>> -Michael

>
> So you're finding it difficult to see an ideological connection between
> atheism, communism and the free software connection?
> Try harder...it's hiding in plain site.
> Frank


Are you serious? Who cares? A few goobers, maybe.

Windows or Linux, it's all just fukkin software... that's it.

Gawd dam, I reckon I can get a bit excited about tech crap
at times- but, some of you freaks really need to get a fukkin life.


-Michael
 
Adam Albright wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:33:58 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>
>
>>Adam Albright wrote:

>
>
>>>So damn funny, that's Frankie! You claim to run a marketing company
>>>and yet don't have a web site.

>
>
>>Yeah we have a marketing/advertising agency. Our portfolio and existing
>>clients speak for us.

>
>
> We only hear YOU bragging.
>
>
>>Plus some of the printers we use actually use some
>>of our work in their portfolios. We accept only referrals. That's much
>>better than some glitzy web site.
>>We've very good at what we do.

>
>
> So good you keep it hidden. Got it. Thanks for sharing. <snicker>
>
>>>That's like a prostitute not having condoms with her.

>>
>>Oh, so you frequent prostitutes huh? Well, that's your problem not mine.

>
>
> Another feeble Frankie attempt to twist what I actually said.
>
>
>>>Frankie is as phony as a three dollar bill.

>>
>>Well, lets just think about things for a moment. You're the one claiming
>>to have an iq of 170 (yeah right!). You're the one claiming to have
>>"retired" at 40 yrs. You're the one claiming to be a computer genius yet
>>you can't fix your on computer.
>>Now who's the phony?

>
>
> You just repeated the same lies you have dozens of times before. That
> only proves you can't even come up with an original insult. How
> pathetic is that?
>
>
>>>So all those servers you claim to have do what?

>>
>>Servers? Sorry pal, now you're starting to lie and that won't work.
>>We have one server, WHS, that replaced Server 2003, and backs up all
>>important work on a daily basis.

>
>
> In other words you have no server. A "server" is a computer that
> serves up web pages. Since you admitted you have no web pages, you
> therefore have no web server, obviously none of your own, not even
> rented space. LOL! Some marketing company.
>
> You don't even know the jargon. Frankie, you're such a dope. WHS is
> just software, and Microsoft crap. Big freaking deal. What a phony.
>
> I can't think of anybody that would consider the crap that comes out
> your mouth as important. You mean you "save" the crap you post here?
>
> Priceless!
>
>

Ut oh...I think you're stinkin drunk again!
You said servers...not web servers...!
If you don't know the difference then I'd say you're a newbie and an
idiot to boot.
Always said we have and use one server.
Check it out bozo.
And oh, get a freakin life you stupid loser.
Frank
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:18:03 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:


>> I can't think of anybody that would consider the crap that comes out
>> your mouth as important. You mean you "save" the crap you post here?
>>
>> Priceless!
>>
>>

>Ut oh...I think you're stinkin drunk again!
>You said servers...not web servers...!
>If you don't know the difference then I'd say you're a newbie and an
>idiot to boot.
>Always said we have and use one server.
>Check it out bozo.
>And oh, get a freakin life you stupid loser.
>Frank


Tell me where you live and I can recommend a mental health center in
your neighborhood. You need help bad Bozo.

I need to remind little Frankie he said "he was through with
responding to me" that pledge lasted a day.

You know when I'll be through with you Frankie? When you gone for
good.

ROTFLMAO!
 
Alias wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>>>>> Alias
>>>> I've been working with computer system long before you knew what a
>>>> computer was.
>>> Really? The first time I operated a computer was in 1968. Remember
>>> punch cards?

>>
>> Yes I was working on HP 3000, Data General 1200, and Univac 1108
>> systems with punch card readers.
>> Also desiging hardware and software during that time.
>>
>>
>>>> I've been playing with different versions of Linux and Ubuntu since
>>>> it first came out.
>>>> Its still a toy for a desktop OS always has been always will be.
>>> What can Windows do that Ubuntu can't do besides accuse you of
>>> piracy, play games requiring DX and attract viruses and malware?

>>
>> Interoperate with businesss software packages and do real work

>
> And "real work" being?


Anything NOT websurfing, email, or word processing/spreadsheets.
Proprietary executables in use. DOS executables that windows can/has
been backwards compatable since '95 (working on 12 years now). Linux
may have been around in the same timeframe, but hasn't progressed
anywhere. Nowhere. Still like it was first released.

I'm so VERY tempted to paste my URL to my linux rant here, but if this
is OT, my rant will not only start a flame war, it will get many people
blacklisted on many people's newsreading client. I won't do it. Just
understand the general feel is that Linux isn't ready for any mainstream
use, and I don't ever see it being ready. Others, such as Apple, can
take it over and remove the less popular systems like Linux. Otherwise
on this thread, there are numbers posted that linux is about 1% internet
market share. Apple's passed linux up a long time ago. I promote Apple
and will physically harm people who advocate linux, if I have access to
them.

>>>> There has been no significant changes in years and you know it.
>>> I've seen a significant change from Ubuntu 6.06 to 7.04.
>>>

>>
>> And no real change in the number of users. Several companys have
>> offered systems with Linux and dropped it because nobody wanted it.

>
> Companies ... companies. I like it better than XP or Vista I am somebody.


No you're not. you're still a number.. lumped in with the rest of the
linux advocates. You aren't making yourself unique, you're just another
linux advocate that doesn't understand the real business world that
needs to deal with the rest of the business world.

Run Microsoft Word 2007 on your Ubuntu natively, without any API
emulators or virtualization and you would have a point, maybe.

>>>> Insert your FUD here.
>>> YOU insert it. Yuck!
>>>

>>
>> Ya right. Grow up.

>
> No sense of humor, eh? I guess you've been doing too much "real work".


You have no sense of real-world interoperability.

I don't know what country you live in, but in the US, each governmental
state offices send out documents in Microsoft format to regional
governmental agencies, and expect a response in Microsoft format.
Including archives that are packed up, and distributed in a
self-extracting (maybe proprietary compression) files. Run the .exe
natively. Try it.
 
Adam Albright wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:18:03 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I can't think of anybody that would consider the crap that comes out
>>>your mouth as important. You mean you "save" the crap you post here?
>>>
>>>Priceless!
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Ut oh...I think you're stinkin drunk again!
>>You said servers...not web servers...!
>>If you don't know the difference then I'd say you're a newbie and an
>>idiot to boot.
>>Always said we have and use one server.
>>Check it out bozo.
>>And oh, get a freakin life you stupid loser.
>>Frank

>
>
> Tell me where you live and I can recommend a mental health center in
> your neighborhood.



hehehe...I knew your were a mental case...lol! Why is it that you know
where every mental institution in the entire US is located? Cause you've
been in them?

You need help bad Bozo.

No, it help badly, bozo.

>
> I need to remind little Frankie he said "he was through with
> responding to me" that pledge lasted a day.


I just can't resist booting your loser asre all over this ng, sorry...lol!
>
> You know when I'll be through with you Frankie? When you gone for
> good.


Hold your breath till I'm gone...that'll cure all of your
problems...hahahah...lol!

Frank
 
Alias wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>> news:eyh83gSyHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:emowydJyHHA.5276@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Give it up already Linux and Ubuntu is crap on the desktop and
>>>>>>>>> over 98% of the world knows it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False and false.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Those numbers have not made any significant changes in the last
>>>>>>>>> 10 years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So go play with your other Linux droids.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The inevitable insult from someone jealous because he paid an
>>>>>>>> arm and a leg for Vista only to find out that Ubuntu is better
>>>>>>>> and free. Too bad, baby. Or should I say Hasta La Vista, Baby?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't cost me a dime. And Ubuntu is still crap for anyone who
>>>>>>> does real work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truer words were never spoken! :-)
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>> Course neither of you dare to say what "real work" is and can only
>>>>> snootily sneer at Open Source. Jealousy usually works that way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>> There is a reality that you linux lovers are simply not willing or
>>>> are unable to accept and that is that linux is not a main stream
>>>> business os capable of running most "real world" productive
>>>> software. And please, don't tell me about wine or emulators. We've
>>>> been thru diatribe with you guys many times before and nothing,
>>>> absolutely nothing, has changed. You still can't run most major
>>>> software applications on linux...period! The software applications
>>>> most business need and use on a daily basis will not run on linux.
>>>> Linux has some applications that are "almost" similar, but "almost"
>>>> won't cut it in the "real" business world.
>>>> Sorry!
>>>> You may think in your mind that is will but in the "real" world (a
>>>> place you don't seem to be a part of) it really doesn't run the type
>>>> of software most (90+ %) of all business need to run in order to be
>>>> productive.
>>>>
>>>> Now you may insert your snide, irrelevant reply that makes you feel
>>>> good because it doesn't change a darn thing and deep inside you know
>>>> it doesn't.
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And the real work is? And the software programs are?
>>>
>>> Alias, not holding his breath

>>
>> Remote manage 10 domains - Policies for updates for 2000+ machines -
>> Auto install or deinstall software.
>> Local administration groups - Remote management - and this is just the
>> management part.
>> I'm not going to get into interoperability as it would be way over
>> your head. So I'm waiting for your answer to the above.
>>

>
> Um, that's not "real work"; that's managing computers. I suspect there
> is a way when you consider how many large corporations and governments
> use Linux. I do all my work with Ubuntu and it provides me with real
> money. What do the operators of these computers do that Ubuntu can't do?


Managing computers IS real work, Alias. An unmanaged computer is a
vulnerable computer.

Managing infrastructure IS real work.

Managing domains (in the simplest sense, to the most complex sense) IS
real work.

> Can one send and receive email with Ubuntu? Yes.
>
> Can one surf the web? Yes
>
> Can one do spreadsheets, word docs., data base, web sites, Gimp, etc.? Yes.


Sending/receiving email IS NOT real work.
Web surfing IS NOT real work
Word processing, spreadsheets IS NOT real work. Creating/Editing images
IS NOT real work.

> Can one do IM with Ubuntu? Yes. VOIP? Yes.


IM IS NOT real work. VoIP is a protocol/technology, not "work" in my eyes.

> Can one easily get a virus with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.


Note: I kept your original line intact, no changes. I made the minor
change of excluding 'easily' in the statements below.

Can one get any virus/worm with Win32/64?
(118099 Win32, 5 Win64 on search)
http://www.viruslist.com/en/find?search_mode=virus&words=Win32
http://www.viruslist.com/en/find?search_mode=virus&words=Win64

Can one get any virus/worm with BSD?
(Found 40 on search)
http://www.viruslist.com/en/find?search_mode=virus&words=BSD

Can one get any virus/worm with Linux?
(Found 1111 on search)
http://www.viruslist.com/en/find?search_mode=virus&words=Linux

Might I add, the viruses on BSD seem to be both BSD/Linux independant
(i.e: requiring apache to run to exploit these boxes). I found one
(DoS.Linux.Chass) that is Linux specific that 1) doesn't require a 3rd
party binary, 2) doesn't affect BSD, or wasn't designed for BSD.

> Can one easily get malware with Ubuntu? No. With Windows? Yes.


WRONG.

Tracking cookies are considered malware. You get malware with any
Internet-connected machine and a WWW browser.

"malware" is defined as:

"software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the
owner's informed consent" (wikipedia.com)
"any code, program, script, software or any instructions interpreted as
attacking a computer operating system (most probably a Windows operating
system). Malware includes spyware, trojans, viruses/virii, denial of
service/DoS attacks." (urbandictionary.com)
"Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer
functions or sends personal data about the user to unauthorized parties
over the Internet." (dictionary.com)

I think dictionary.com has it nailed best.

> Is everything updated at once with Ubuntu? Yes. With Windows? No.


Microsoft provides updates in one place for everything Microsoft
(Windows, Office...). But doesn't update 3rd party software such as
Mozilla software, or any governmental agency. Neither does BSD,
directly. You still obtain updates in BSD, but not through the OS's own
servers.

> Does one have to constantly prove that one is not a pirate over and over
> again with Ubuntu? No. With Windows Vista? You betcha.


http://www.linuxgenuineadvantage.org/

You're comparing bananas to oranges (I did not want to use the
'Apples[1] to Oranges' comparison).

Linux wants everyone to share it. Microsoft wants only the people who
have legally paid for a license to use it. This is an unfair
comparison. You should drop this immediately, permanently.

> Alias


Mull this information over, Alias. You aren't entirely right.

[1] http://www.apple.com/
 
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:23:28 -0600, Tim Judd <tjudd01@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Word processing, spreadsheets IS NOT real work. Creating/Editing images
>IS NOT real work.


Oh I see, whatever other people do on their computer isn't real work,
but you playing nurse maid is real work. Got it. thanks for sharing.
 
Adam Albright wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:23:28 -0600, Tim Judd <tjudd01@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Word processing, spreadsheets IS NOT real work. Creating/Editing images
>> IS NOT real work.

>
> Oh I see, whatever other people do on their computer isn't real work,
> but you playing nurse maid is real work. Got it. thanks for sharing.
>


If Alias can define what is real work, so can I.

I'm sorry I missed this point in my previous post.
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't
>>>>>>> deny they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time
>>>>>>> (a lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a
>>>>>>> linux candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together
>>>>>>> quite easily.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer
>>>>> in his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux
>>>>> free software ideology rather nicely.
>>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they
>>>>> are atheist or communist do you?
>>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I vote democratic and don't believe in a god. I do believe in cause
>>>> and effect. Do you?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> heheh...sure and which party in spain do you align yourself with?
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>> I don't vote in Spain as I am not a Spanish citizen (I have residency
>> due to being married to a Spanish lady). I vote in the US presidential
>> elections and vote democratic. Although there is a very small
>> communist party in Spain, I wouldn't vote for them if I could vote here.
>>
>> So, that just leaves you god to go on about.
>>
>> Alias

>
> I asked you which political party in spain you align yourself with, not
> vote for.
> Also which atheist group do you support?
> What is the URL to your supposed web site?
> Well...?
> Frank



The point of being an atheist is that you are not forced to support ANY
group, and that also enables one to express an unbiased opinion based
upon observation rather than upon some philosophical dogma.
 
MICHAEL wrote:
> * Frank:
>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or some drivel like that. Frankly, I...don't have time to join
>>>>>>> religious cults.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is strange (well maybe not) because a couple of unbuntu's
>>>>>> leading cheerleaders in this ng are admitted atheist and don't deny
>>>>>> they’re communist which seems to fit in nicely with the free
>>>>>> software movement and echoes what SB of MS has said for some time (a
>>>>>> lot of communist use linux). I don't know if being an
>>>>>> atheist/communist is some kind of uber qualifier for being a linux
>>>>>> candidate, but the philosophies do seem to mess together quite easily.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! Do you realize how much you sound like Steve Ballmer?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/
>>>>>
>>>> It was intentional, seeing as how I kind of paraphrased Mr. Ballmer in
>>>> his contention that atheist & communist use and fit the linux free
>>>> software ideology rather nicely.
>>>> You don't see our main linux trolls vehemently denying that they are
>>>> atheist or communist do you?
>>>> Which in effect proves that SB and me (kind of rhymes, huh?) are
>>>> correct in our assessment.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>> Making associations like that only proves you are a looney Frank

>> hehehe...then I'm in good company with Ballmer. I'll gladly accept that!
>> Much better than that real nut case you open sores addicts worship, RS.
>> Frank

>
> Frank- what is wrong with you?
>
> I guarantee you I am no communist, and on occasions have
> been called a spoiled capitalist pig. My friend, Charlie Tame,
> might have even thrown similar words at me before. But, I
> do like Linux and I hope the Open Source community keeps
> moving right along.
>
> I debated about even replying to your post.... it's really not worthy
> of any comment. You're really letting your true colors show and need
> to know how ignorant you've started sounding.
>
> I reckon you've always been like this, and expecting better from
> you in your old age, is just too much for you to handle. That's a shame.
>
>
> -Michael



Speaking of which, hey, that DVD worked on my older Asus and got 1024 X
768 so O was pleased with that - a couple of the games wouldn't work and
the ones that did were very slow frame rate which may have been due to
the drive or something, no time to study. They obviously put in a lot of
hard work and it looks very professional.

As to this "Professional Software" kick Frank seems to be on does the
really think that only Microsoft products are professionally written?
 
Back
Top