The WTF Starts Now

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:


>
> Bingo! The color dropper reading YOU got! Not what I got. I don't need
> to add I have tons more creditability then you do, plus anyone could
> have easily checked themselves. How come nobody yet has stepped
> forward to backup your claim of RGB 100,0,0?

I guess only you are having a rage fit other this non-issue? Anyway,
depending on where you color sample in the fountain fill will determine
what exact RGB numbers you get. Can you understand that statement?
>
> My guess, because while you claim to be an expert, that's you run some
> business, you run a marketing company, blah, blah, blah, you keep
> posting garbage that exposes you both as a liar and dummy.
>
> BTW dummy I've been letting you make the same mistake over and over
> just so you can't deny you said it. You keep referring to "fountain
> fill" you have claimed you have Photoshop. There is no such named
> feature in Photoshop, buy is the in cheap knock off Paint Shop Pro.
> Photoshop uses the more accurate term gradient fill.

Sorry to burst your bubble stupid, but that's a common term used
(fountain fill, gradient fill, they're are interchangeable terms) in the
business.... Fountain fill comes from Corel not PSP. But Corel now owns
PSP so they might have started to use it. You didn't know that did you?
We don't use PSP in our biz.
We primarily use Corel Draw X3 and Adobe CS3 Master Collection. The eye
dropper was quicker in Corel, so I used it. Is that a problem for you?


> Why do you lie about everything?
>
Excuse me! If you only would learn to read and learn to comprehend what
you've just read you'd see that I'VE NEVER, EVER LIED TO YOU SWEETHEART!
Now go look everything up on google so you can respond intelligently, ok?

The more I corner your little rat like arse the more you're turning into
some kind of weirdo, sicko, wacko rage idiot.
Am I getting under your thin ignorant skin?
Frank

 

[norm]

Frank wrote:
> norm wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> norm wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?
>>>
>>>
>>> as he has been
>>>
>>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares
>>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.
>>>
>>>
>>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject
>>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg
>>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?
>>>
>>> I
>>>
>>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the
>>>> available choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading
>>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar
>>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to
>>> understand?
>>>
>>>
>>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?
>>>
>>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>> Wouldn't you?
>>> Frank
>>>
>> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your
>> very first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said,
>> and I quote:
>> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank
>> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color
>> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than
>> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:
>> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>> Wouldn't you?" Frank
>> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?
>> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how
>> you reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about
>> your business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just
>> give us nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol
>>
>
> Nice try norm but no cigar.
> I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly
> referring to the referenced jpg he posted.
> It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?
> Frank
>
At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet
been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?

--
norm

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:56:37 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the
>> Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.
>
>You're a drunken lying son of a bitch! I never, ever said that Vista GUI
>was incapable of producing black color. I said that the posted jpg did
>not have any black in the taskbar.

>It is really difficult for you to be wrong isn't it?

Yes, because I am rarely wrong as you've discovered.

You've claimed that the Vista GUI can't produce black, you were proven
wrong. You also claimed Vista doesn't have any black in it. An EXACT
quote.

See it right here fool:
.................................................................................

>>>>>>>"Frank" <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:%23fnihCmzHHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You can set the color to anything you like, even Vista Black.
>>>>>>>>>Black crap means you're constipated, yaknow, like Vista. It's not
>>>>>>>>>crap. You just can't see that the times are changing and, like an
>>>>>>>>>old woman, have to cling to the past.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Vista doesn't have any black in it.

.................................................................................
>
>
>Those are you words.
>
>Look it up pal and post it RIGHT NOW!!! GOT THAT!
>RIGHT NOW...or else stick you're loser tail between your legs and run
>off in total defeat.
>RIGHT NOW!!!
>Well...?
>I'm waiting...!

Idiot!
>
>
>If you force me to look up your posts at Google I assure you I will make
>> you choke on them.
>>
>>
>Do it you drunken moron!
>RIGHT NOW!!!
>I'm waiting...

Wait not more Frankie. I did. LOL!

>Well...?

What a doofus!

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:59:07 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>PROVE that what I told you is incorrect. Until then your just making a idiot
>out of yourself.

I never understand why idiots that post Strawmen NEVER seem to
understand why they get turned around to expose them as fools.

Learn boy, learn!
>
>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>news:2d9ia3lgitb6681hngnpquv9ib96pj82a3@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:31:40 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:
>>
>>>Gary wrote:
>>>
>>>> You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and
>>>> reflected light do you.
>>>> Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G
>>>> if
>>>> any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what
>>>> numb
>>>> nuts it isn't black is it?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>hahaha...that's funny!
>>>Frank
>>
>> The both of you are funny in your absolute ignorance on so many
>> topics.
>>
>

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:46:05 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>Write this down so you don't look like a fool Computer Monitors use RGB in
>there displays.
>What a dumb ass.

Maybe in you narrow little world dummy.
>
>
>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>news:6dbia3pkjtb139vf7u47uv6lp0irhhc2m7@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:13:01 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:
>>
>>>You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and
>>>reflected light do you.
>>>Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G if
>>>any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what
>>>numb
>>>nuts it isn't black is it?
>>
>> Write this down so you don't look as stupid next time. Monitors
>> neither have to be nor always are calibrated to RGB color space. So
>> your premise is bogus. You need a better teacher then Frankie. He's a
>> hoot to read, but technically he's behind your average ten year old.
>>
>

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:46:57 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>Couldn't come up with the difference could you.
>
I've been slapping you silly every time you dumb enough to post.
>
>
>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>news9bia39qgbn2ob2ag73cihanrb69pps50a@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:00:42 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:
>>
>>>This coming from the person who doesn't know the difference between
>>>transmitted and reflected light.
>>
>> Did you learn how to make goofy Strawmen from Frankie?
>>>
>>>
>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>>>news:mh0ia3141alrrv9j13j6e90pvebcfs1b93@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Yes Ubunto is a toy os.
>>>>>I think that my previous post was too complex for you.
>>>>
>>>> And you act like a child poster having a temper tantrum. Post again
>>>> when you can act like some responsible adult.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

 

[Alias]

Gary wrote:
> And its available at your local Toys are Us store.

It's available on line and at discerning computer shops. Vista is
available at Walmart and Best Buy alongside Norton and McAfee.

Alias
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message
> news:%23uQplV6zHHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Frank wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ucgKG8dzHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OQLEp64yHHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:eg0OpFCyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think Microsoft should change "The WOW Starts Now" to "The WTF
>>>>>>>>>> Starts Now". After only one day of using Vista I've come to the
>>>>>>>>>> realization that it simply wont work for me. All of my hardware
>>>>>>>>>> is supported, however, most of the applications I require on a day
>>>>>>>>>> to day basis would not run (or install). I've been doing a lot of
>>>>>>>>>> reading regarding these type situations and it seems more people
>>>>>>>>>> are dissatisfied with Vista than there are who actually like the
>>>>>>>>>> new OS. Yea, it's pretty... but whats the use if there is a ton of
>>>>>>>>>> software that just wont function. Frustrating.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste of bandwidth... not the orignal post, but the
>>>>>>>>> unbelievable amount of personal attacks that followed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can thank Frank for that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As if you're not party to the nature of these threads. Funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you count? Frank jumps on each and every one of my posts. He does
>>>>>> the same with Adam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> C'mon... that's no answer... the question remains; you don't consider
>>>>> yourself party to the nature of these threads? I see you and Frank
>>>>> going back and forth for tens of posts following this one... so you're
>>>>> saying Frank's to blame for your OT posts in this ng? Uh... no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lang
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am a party to these threads but not as much as Frank is. How come
>>>> you're not jumping on Frank?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> You just do get it do you? You have the audacity to come into this Vista
>>> ng and do nothing but slam MS and Vista, which you don't have then openly
>>> promote linux and wonder why people don't like or respect you?
>>> Are you that crass and clueless?
>>> I guess so, huh. As you have been asked and told not to do it yet you
>>> have no respect at all for others or the fact that your promoting another
>>> os in this ng is not, repeat is not, acceptable.
>>> But you simple don't care. Talk about not having any class at all.
>>> You're the prime example pal.
>>> Frank
>> YAWN. http://www.ubuntu.com/, better than Vista or XP.
>>
>> Alias
>
>

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ucgKG8dzHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OQLEp64yHHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:eg0OpFCyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think Microsoft should change "The WOW Starts Now" to "The
>>>>>>>>>> WTF Starts Now". After only one day of using Vista I've come
>>>>>>>>>> to the realization that it simply wont work for me. All of my
>>>>>>>>>> hardware is supported, however, most of the applications I
>>>>>>>>>> require on a day to day basis would not run (or install).
>>>>>>>>>> I've been doing a lot of reading regarding these type
>>>>>>>>>> situations and it seems more people are dissatisfied with
>>>>>>>>>> Vista than there are who actually like the new OS. Yea, it's
>>>>>>>>>> pretty... but whats the use if there is a ton of software that
>>>>>>>>>> just wont function. Frustrating.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste of bandwidth... not the orignal post, but the
>>>>>>>>> unbelievable amount of personal attacks that followed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can thank Frank for that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As if you're not party to the nature of these threads. Funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you count? Frank jumps on each and every one of my posts. He
>>>>>> does the same with Adam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> C'mon... that's no answer... the question remains; you don't
>>>>> consider yourself party to the nature of these threads? I see you
>>>>> and Frank going back and forth for tens of posts following this
>>>>> one... so you're saying Frank's to blame for your OT posts in this
>>>>> ng? Uh... no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am a party to these threads but not as much as Frank is. How
>>>> come you're not jumping on Frank?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You just do get it do you? You have the audacity to come into this
>>> Vista ng and do nothing but slam MS and Vista, which you don't have
>>> then openly promote linux and wonder why people don't like or respect
>>> you?
>>> Are you that crass and clueless?
>>> I guess so, huh. As you have been asked and told not to do it yet you
>>> have no respect at all for others or the fact that your promoting
>>> another os in this ng is not, repeat is not, acceptable.
>>> But you simple don't care. Talk about not having any class at all.
>>> You're the prime example pal.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> YAWN. http://www.ubuntu.com/, better than Vista or XP.
>>
>> Alias
>
> You just proved my point.

As if.

Alias

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ucgKG8dzHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OQLEp64yHHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:eg0OpFCyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think Microsoft should change "The WOW Starts Now" to "The
>>>>>>>>>> WTF Starts Now". After only one day of using Vista I've come
>>>>>>>>>> to the realization that it simply wont work for me. All of my
>>>>>>>>>> hardware is supported, however, most of the applications I
>>>>>>>>>> require on a day to day basis would not run (or install).
>>>>>>>>>> I've been doing a lot of reading regarding these type
>>>>>>>>>> situations and it seems more people are dissatisfied with
>>>>>>>>>> Vista than there are who actually like the new OS. Yea, it's
>>>>>>>>>> pretty... but whats the use if there is a ton of software that
>>>>>>>>>> just wont function. Frustrating.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste of bandwidth... not the orignal post, but the
>>>>>>>>> unbelievable amount of personal attacks that followed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a waste...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can thank Frank for that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As if you're not party to the nature of these threads. Funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you count? Frank jumps on each and every one of my posts. He
>>>>>> does the same with Adam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> C'mon... that's no answer... the question remains; you don't
>>>>> consider yourself party to the nature of these threads? I see you
>>>>> and Frank going back and forth for tens of posts following this
>>>>> one... so you're saying Frank's to blame for your OT posts in this
>>>>> ng? Uh... no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am a party to these threads but not as much as Frank is. How
>>>> come you're not jumping on Frank?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You just do get it do you? You have the audacity to come into this
>>> Vista ng and do nothing but slam MS and Vista, which you don't have
>>> then openly promote linux and wonder why people don't like or respect
>>> you?
>>
>>
>> Only the Wintards like you have a problem. Others click on this:
>> www.ubuntu.com and get a real OS.
>>
>>> Are you that crass and clueless?
>>
>>
>> Helpful is the correct adjective.
>>
>>> I guess so, huh. As you have been asked and told not to do it yet you
>>> have no respect at all for others or the fact that your promoting
>>> another os in this ng is not, repeat is not, acceptable.
>>
>>
>> Only to Wintards like you who think that insulting someone is the way
>> to refute their argument.
>>
>>> But you simple don't care. Talk about not having any class at all.
>>> You're the prime example pal.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> I get feedback and many people are happy I turned them on to Ubuntu
>> through this group. Get over it and live with it because it ain't
>> going away. You will see more and more people posting here about
>> Ubuntu. Ain't life grand?
>>
>> Alias
>
> You're clueless, classless and arrogant.
> You have all the human qualities of real loser and you're proud of it!
> You get what you deserve.
> Frank

You just made my point:

>> Only to Wintards like you who think that insulting someone is the way
>> to refute their argument.

Alias

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:53:01 -0400, norm <noone@afakeddomain.net>
wrote:

>> Nice try norm but no cigar.
>> I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly
>> referring to the referenced jpg he posted.
>> It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?
>> Frank
>>
>At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet
>been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?

It interferes with Frank's lying.

 

[Frank]

norm wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> norm wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> norm wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> as he has been
>>>>
>>>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares
>>>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject
>>>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg
>>>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?
>>>>
>>>> I
>>>>
>>>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the
>>>>> available choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading
>>>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar
>>>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to
>>>> understand?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?
>>>>
>>>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>>> Wouldn't you?
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your
>>> very first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said,
>>> and I quote:
>>> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank
>>> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color
>>> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than
>>> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:
>>> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>> Wouldn't you?" Frank
>>> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?
>>> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how
>>> you reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about
>>> your business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just
>>> give us nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol
>>>
>>
>> Nice try norm but no cigar.
>> I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly
>> referring to the referenced jpg he posted.
>> It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?
>> Frank
>>
> At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet
> been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?
>

No I fully understand. So what's your problem? Have you ever seen a
default "high color" desktop? I sure as heck haven't.
So if I said Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it, and I was not
referring to the posted jpg, then one would most probably deduce that I
was referring to default settings.
I never, ever said Vista was incapable of producing black color or do
you think I did say that?
Frank

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

>
>>>
>>>Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the
>>>Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.

I never, ever said Vista is not capable of producing black.
Care to post where I said that?
Well...! Find it and post it wok?

Vista doesn't have any black in it.


Those are you words.

Exactly! Vista default GUI does not have any black in it.
What exactly do you think I was referring to?
Not matter what you say the default GUI isn't black.
Can you put black into Vista GUI.
Yep!
So you need to learn to read and comprehend georgie-boy.
Cause I'm right and you're so very wrong on this matter.
It's driving you nuts isn't it?
Idiot!
Frank

 

[Alias]

*711 wrote:
> I would be glad if my problems stoped on the incompatibility issues
> since at this point in time (july 2007) most of things are already
> compatible (safe NVIDIA, but that is because they are too inconpetent to
> write a working driver so I don't blame Microsoft for this)...

nVidia is too busy writing drivers for Linux to be bothered with an OS
that was born to die.

>
> The thing that bugs me the most are the things that keep missing from
> my computer... first my start programs vanished, then my system folders
> faded into the pretty moving wallpapper... and now my shortcuts are
> getting boken and some of the bundled programs (Snipping Tool for
> instance) decide when they work and when don't....

That does sound frustrating.

>
> Its getting to my nerves, BUT I am perssisting because "its really
> pretty", and as a designer, I like polish visuals on my work enviroment.
> But still, 2 weeks fighting the ugly beast, and getting closer to
> abandon my 200US$ investment to rot on the drawer by the second.

If you really like polished visuals in your work environment, check out
Ubuntu with Beryl:

www.ubuntu.com

Beryl and Ubuntu:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZC7jtKQRlFY

Alias

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

> I never understand why idiots that post Strawmen NEVER seem to
> understand why they get turned around to expose them as fools.


You mean like you?
Well, we all got your number, you stupid jackass fool!
Frank

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:

> *711 wrote:
>
>> I would be glad if my problems stoped on the incompatibility issues
>> since at this point in time (july 2007) most of things are already
>> compatible (safe NVIDIA, but that is because they are too inconpetent to
>> write a working driver so I don't blame Microsoft for this)...
>
>
> nVidia is too busy writing drivers for Linux to be bothered with an OS
> that was born to die.
>
>
hehehe...now that's a statement you can take to the
bank...hahahaha...that's down right hilarious..!
You're becoming very delusional about linux aren't you.

It's really a sickness, eh, cause with you isn't it?
Frank

 

[*711]

The problem for me is that I work w/ Maya and sadly Linux is not up for
the task in this department

Also, all the softwares I use on daly basis are not there, and keep
switching for alternatives is not exactely what I am looking for right
now... nor the entire world warket.

Anyway, kinda 2 bright for me the Linux thing, but that "4 desktops"
sounds promissing... I might give it a shot sometime.


--
*711

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:32:59 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>norm wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> norm wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> norm wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> as he has been
>>>>>
>>>>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares
>>>>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject
>>>>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg
>>>>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?
>>>>>
>>>>> I
>>>>>
>>>>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the
>>>>>> available choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading
>>>>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar
>>>>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to
>>>>> understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?
>>>>>
>>>>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>>>> Wouldn't you?
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your
>>>> very first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said,
>>>> and I quote:
>>>> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank
>>>> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color
>>>> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than
>>>> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:
>>>> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>>> Wouldn't you?" Frank
>>>> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?
>>>> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how
>>>> you reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about
>>>> your business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just
>>>> give us nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nice try norm but no cigar.
>>> I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly
>>> referring to the referenced jpg he posted.
>>> It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?
>>> Frank
>>>
>> At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet
>> been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?
>>
>
>No I fully understand. So what's your problem? Have you ever seen a
>default "high color" desktop? I sure as heck haven't.
>So if I said Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it, and I was not
>referring to the posted jpg, then one would most probably deduce that I
>was referring to default settings.
>I never, ever said Vista was incapable of producing black color or do
>you think I did say that?
>Frank

We KNOW you said because your exact quote was posted.

Dance Frankie dance! You did say it and when confronted with the post
you said it in you still deny it. You think changing your story, which
you always try to do once painted in a corner works?

That makes you:

a. A wack job
b. Liar
c. Damn Fool
d. All of the above.

 

[Adam Albright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:41:04 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the
>>>>Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.
>
>I never, ever said Vista is not capable of producing black.
>Care to post where I said that?
>Well...! Find it and post it wok?
>
>Vista doesn't have any black in it.

>Those are you words.
>
>Exactly! Vista default GUI does not have any black in it.

Now you're changing your story, trying to add 'default' to what you
said about Vista's GUI. NOT WHAT YOU ORIGINALLY SAID. You GOT to be a
psycho to think anybody believes any of the crap you post. You
constantly lie about everything even when confronted with your own
words. Exact quotes. You keep pretending you didn't say what everybody
SEES you said. Even when what you deny is in the same thread where you
lie you didn't say it. Damn man, you can't get much more screwed up
then that!

>What exactly do you think I was referring to?

We're suppose to guess what you meant and ignore what you actually
said? You love to call others idiots, but the real idiot always turns
out to be YOU and you simply can't bring yourself to admit you keep
screwing up.

>Not matter what you say the default GUI isn't black.

You're moving the goal posts again. You made no mention of default
GUI, you simply said the Vista GUI has no black in it.

Run Frankie run away from your own words. Entertaining to watch you
slowly hang yourself.

>Can you put black into Vista GUI.
>Yep!

Yet you originally claimed you couldn't.

>So you need to learn to read and comprehend georgie-boy.

I read you like a book. A 1st grade book because that's your
intellectual limit.

>Cause I'm right and you're so very wrong on this matter.


Sure Frankie, repeat the same lie like you always do, odd, just like
Justin the other world class idiot that use to hang out here and you
expect people will be dumb enough to believe you.

>It's driving you nuts isn't it?

No, I'm helping you prove YOU are nuts.

>Idiot!
>Frank

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:32:59 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:
>
>
>>norm wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>norm wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>norm wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>as he has been
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares
>>>>>>>disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject
>>>>>>matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg
>>>>>>posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the
>>>>>>>available choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading
>>>>>>taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar
>>>>>>referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to
>>>>>>understand?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>>>>>Wouldn't you?
>>>>>>Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your
>>>>>very first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said,
>>>>>and I quote:
>>>>>"Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank
>>>>>Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color
>>>>>schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than
>>>>>what it is stated as being?", you replied above:
>>>>>"If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.
>>>>>Wouldn't you?" Frank
>>>>>So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?
>>>>>Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how
>>>>>you reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about
>>>>>your business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just
>>>>>give us nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Nice try norm but no cigar.
>>>>I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly
>>>>referring to the referenced jpg he posted.
>>>>It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?
>>>>Frank
>>>>
>>>
>>>At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet
>>>been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?
>>>
>>
>>No I fully understand. So what's your problem? Have you ever seen a
>>default "high color" desktop? I sure as heck haven't.
>>So if I said Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it, and I was not
>>referring to the posted jpg, then one would most probably deduce that I
>>was referring to default settings.
>>I never, ever said Vista was incapable of producing black color or do
>>you think I did say that?
>>Frank
>
>
> We KNOW you said because your exact quote was posted.
>
> Dance Frankie dance! You did say it and when confronted with the post
> you said it in you still deny it. You think changing your story, which
> you always try to do once painted in a corner works?
>
> That makes you:
>
> a. A wack job
> b. Liar
> c. Damn Fool
> d. All of the above.
>

Well, let me ask you something there mr genuis.
Do you have black in your default desktop GUI?
Well....no lying ok?
Frank

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:41:04 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:
>
>
>>Adam Albright wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the
>>>>>Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.
>>
>>I never, ever said Vista is not capable of producing black.
>>Care to post where I said that?
>>Well...! Find it and post it wok?
>>
>>Vista doesn't have any black in it.
>
>
>>Those are you words.
>>
>>Exactly! Vista default GUI does not have any black in it.
>
>
> Now you're changing your story, trying to add 'default' to what you
> said about Vista's GUI. NOT WHAT YOU ORIGINALLY SAID. You GOT to be a
> psycho to think anybody believes any of the crap you post. You
> constantly lie about everything even when confronted with your own
> words. Exact quotes. You keep pretending you didn't say what everybody
> SEES you said. Even when what you deny is in the same thread where you
> lie you didn't say it. Damn man, you can't get much more screwed up
> then that!
>
>
>>What exactly do you think I was referring to?
>
>
> We're suppose to guess what you meant and ignore what you actually
> said? You love to call others idiots, but the real idiot always turns
> out to be YOU and you simply can't bring yourself to admit you keep
> screwing up.
>
>
>>Not matter what you say the default GUI isn't black.
>
>
> You're moving the goal posts again. You made no mention of default
> GUI, you simply said the Vista GUI has no black in it.
>
> Run Frankie run away from your own words. Entertaining to watch you
> slowly hang yourself.
>
>
>>Can you put black into Vista GUI.
>>Yep!
>
>
> Yet you originally claimed you couldn't.
>
>
>>So you need to learn to read and comprehend georgie-boy.
>
>
> I read you like a book. A 1st grade book because that's your
> intellectual limit.
>
>
>>Cause I'm right and you're so very wrong on this matter.
>
>
>
> Sure Frankie, repeat the same lie like you always do, odd, just like
> Justin the other world class idiot that use to hang out here and you
> expect people will be dumb enough to believe you.
>
>
>>It's driving you nuts isn't it?
>
>
> No, I'm helping you prove YOU are nuts.
>
>
>>Idiot!
>>Frank
>
>
Do you have black, as in RGB 0,0,0., in your default Vista GUI?
No lying allowed!
Frank