G
glee
Guest
Exactly, and if it's been sitting there for very long, it may well have
invited root kits aboard.....which is why I have been suggesting
(withoput success) that the OP run a scan from outside Windows, i.e. an
boot CD AV scan.
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in message
news:O33writ2KHA.4336@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Could be a rogue!
>
> Sunbelt Blog: Fake Microsoft Antispyware Center:
> http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/fake-microsoft-antispyware-center.html
>
> McAfee Labs Blog: AntiSpyStorm: Fake Microsoft AntiSpyware Center
> pushing Adware
> http://www.avertlabs.com/research/b...-microsoft-antispyware-center-pushing-adware/
>
> Fake Microsoft AntiSpyware Site Aims For Credit Card Numbers
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202401707
>
>
> LewB wrote:
>> In Program Files this is listed as Microsoft Antispyware and has 3
>> folders
>> Deactivated Items, Quarantined, and TempUpdates and 13 files and 17MB
>> total
>> size. Modified on %-% 2006. Perhaps as someone suggested this could
>> be
>> Windows Defender? There is a separate listing for Defender that has
>> a 2007
>> date but the file makeup is much different and has only 4.5MB. I
>> tried to
>> copy this for your review but it won't take here...and I can't copy
>> it as
>> text to Word to send it along either.
>> Lew
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:44:01 -0700, LewB
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have Microsoft Antispyware Program on this computer, apparently
>>>> there
>>>> since 2006.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no program with that name. Please clarify exactly what you
>>> mean. Do you mean Defender?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Was this the predecessor of the MSE program and needs to be
>>>> removed before downloading MSE? I should be able to disable the
>>>> McAfee
>>>> and then run the MSE to see how the two compare?
>>>
>>>
>>> MSE is much better than McAfee.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I haven't tackled the somewhat involved process recommended by
>>>> Glen and
>>>> for home use question if this is a bit of "overkill"?
>>>> Also I downloaded, installed and ran Malwarebytes and it came
>>>> up with
>>>> two items after hours of full scanning and these were removed. I
>>>> also
>>>> downloaded and installed and ran SuperAntiSpyware and it found
>>>> three items
>>>> from AdWare. What do you folks think about the Spyblaster program
>>>> and
>>>> AdWare?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They are OK, but not a good as Malwarebytes and SuperAntiSpyware. I
>>> would run them *instead* of Malwarebytes and SuperAntiSpyware, but I
>>> don't object to also running them.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't know if this thread is being followed by all so will
>>>> copy this
>>>> comment to the others. Thanks.
>>>> Lew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:17:01 -0700, LewB
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok I then would appreciate your best suggestion, free or
>>>>>> otherwise. The
>>>>>> computer store that did some diagnostics for me said they like
>>>>>> Spyseeper
>>>>>> antivirus from Webroot. I had their basic program spyware
>>>>>> program for a
>>>>>> number of years before their antivirus program became available.
>>>>>> There
>>>>>> should be some consensus of opinion from those of you that follow
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> matters closely as to the best two or three or four one should
>>>>>> consider.
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my recommendations:
>>>>>
>>>>> Get one of the following anti-virus programs
>>>>>
>>>>> The best--NOD32
>>>>>
>>>>> Free and almost as good--Avira, Avast, or Microsoft Security
>>>>> Essentials (as I said in my last message).
>>>>>
>>>>> Also get at least the following two anti-spyware programs (both
>>>>> freeware)--MalwareBytes Anti-Malware and SuperAntiSpyware. Having
>>>>> more
>>>>> than two is even better, but don't run them at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:44:11 -0700, LewB
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Finally a computer wise person said
>>>>>>>> McAfee was available through my cable system (Cox) at no cost
>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>> went for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ugh! There are several better anti-virus programs available for
>>>>>>> free:
>>>>>>> Avira, Avast, and Microsoft Security Essentials.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have always considered it to be in the same league as Norton,
>>>>>>>> etc. I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Yes, it's in *exactly* the same league as Norton. As far as
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> (and many others here) am concerned those are the two worst
>>>>>>> anti-virus
>>>>>>> programs available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a big shame, as far as I'm concerned. Twenty years or so
>>>>>>> ago,
>>>>>>> McAfee was the best such program available, Then Norton took
>>>>>>> over as
>>>>>>> the best. But today, Norton is the worst, and McAfee is second
>>>>>>> worst.
>>>>>>> What happened to them and why they went from the top to the
>>>>>>> bottom, I
>>>>>>> don't know.
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009
A+
http://dts-l.net/
invited root kits aboard.....which is why I have been suggesting
(withoput success) that the OP run a scan from outside Windows, i.e. an
boot CD AV scan.
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in message
news:O33writ2KHA.4336@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Could be a rogue!
>
> Sunbelt Blog: Fake Microsoft Antispyware Center:
> http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/fake-microsoft-antispyware-center.html
>
> McAfee Labs Blog: AntiSpyStorm: Fake Microsoft AntiSpyware Center
> pushing Adware
> http://www.avertlabs.com/research/b...-microsoft-antispyware-center-pushing-adware/
>
> Fake Microsoft AntiSpyware Site Aims For Credit Card Numbers
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202401707
>
>
> LewB wrote:
>> In Program Files this is listed as Microsoft Antispyware and has 3
>> folders
>> Deactivated Items, Quarantined, and TempUpdates and 13 files and 17MB
>> total
>> size. Modified on %-% 2006. Perhaps as someone suggested this could
>> be
>> Windows Defender? There is a separate listing for Defender that has
>> a 2007
>> date but the file makeup is much different and has only 4.5MB. I
>> tried to
>> copy this for your review but it won't take here...and I can't copy
>> it as
>> text to Word to send it along either.
>> Lew
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:44:01 -0700, LewB
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have Microsoft Antispyware Program on this computer, apparently
>>>> there
>>>> since 2006.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no program with that name. Please clarify exactly what you
>>> mean. Do you mean Defender?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Was this the predecessor of the MSE program and needs to be
>>>> removed before downloading MSE? I should be able to disable the
>>>> McAfee
>>>> and then run the MSE to see how the two compare?
>>>
>>>
>>> MSE is much better than McAfee.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I haven't tackled the somewhat involved process recommended by
>>>> Glen and
>>>> for home use question if this is a bit of "overkill"?
>>>> Also I downloaded, installed and ran Malwarebytes and it came
>>>> up with
>>>> two items after hours of full scanning and these were removed. I
>>>> also
>>>> downloaded and installed and ran SuperAntiSpyware and it found
>>>> three items
>>>> from AdWare. What do you folks think about the Spyblaster program
>>>> and
>>>> AdWare?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They are OK, but not a good as Malwarebytes and SuperAntiSpyware. I
>>> would run them *instead* of Malwarebytes and SuperAntiSpyware, but I
>>> don't object to also running them.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't know if this thread is being followed by all so will
>>>> copy this
>>>> comment to the others. Thanks.
>>>> Lew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:17:01 -0700, LewB
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok I then would appreciate your best suggestion, free or
>>>>>> otherwise. The
>>>>>> computer store that did some diagnostics for me said they like
>>>>>> Spyseeper
>>>>>> antivirus from Webroot. I had their basic program spyware
>>>>>> program for a
>>>>>> number of years before their antivirus program became available.
>>>>>> There
>>>>>> should be some consensus of opinion from those of you that follow
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> matters closely as to the best two or three or four one should
>>>>>> consider.
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my recommendations:
>>>>>
>>>>> Get one of the following anti-virus programs
>>>>>
>>>>> The best--NOD32
>>>>>
>>>>> Free and almost as good--Avira, Avast, or Microsoft Security
>>>>> Essentials (as I said in my last message).
>>>>>
>>>>> Also get at least the following two anti-spyware programs (both
>>>>> freeware)--MalwareBytes Anti-Malware and SuperAntiSpyware. Having
>>>>> more
>>>>> than two is even better, but don't run them at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:44:11 -0700, LewB
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Finally a computer wise person said
>>>>>>>> McAfee was available through my cable system (Cox) at no cost
>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>> went for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ugh! There are several better anti-virus programs available for
>>>>>>> free:
>>>>>>> Avira, Avast, and Microsoft Security Essentials.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have always considered it to be in the same league as Norton,
>>>>>>>> etc. I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Yes, it's in *exactly* the same league as Norton. As far as
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> (and many others here) am concerned those are the two worst
>>>>>>> anti-virus
>>>>>>> programs available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a big shame, as far as I'm concerned. Twenty years or so
>>>>>>> ago,
>>>>>>> McAfee was the best such program available, Then Norton took
>>>>>>> over as
>>>>>>> the best. But today, Norton is the worst, and McAfee is second
>>>>>>> worst.
>>>>>>> What happened to them and why they went from the top to the
>>>>>>> bottom, I
>>>>>>> don't know.
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009
A+
http://dts-l.net/