PC TuneUp and CCleaner

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sanford Aranoff
  • Start date Start date
OT: Re: PC TuneUp and CCleaner

Doum wrote:



> Out of curiosity, I downloaded and installed Ccleaner. After making an

> image of my system drive, I ran CC registry cleaner, it found a lot of

> stuff, associated extensions, useless DLLs, etc. I let it do what it

> suggested.

>

> AFAICT, there's nothing broken but I don't see any performance

> improvement so I think I'm gonna leave the registry alone in the future

> but I will check out CC other features.




Hopefully you paid attention to CCleaner's prompt to back-up the changes you

were about to make and did so.

--

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002
 
On 5/24/2010 11:18 AM, Unknown wrote:

> I wouldn't bother with either one. I use WSE (Windows Security Essentials)

> "Sanford Aranoff" wrote in message

> news:4BFAB9F1.9CB55E39@analysis-knowledge.com...

>> What do you think of PC TuneUP for $50 or CCleaner for free?


>

>


Microsoft Security Essentials and these two programs have different

purposes. I haven't used PC Tuneup and use CCleaner very sparingly so I

can't really comment on the merits of either. I use MSE rather than

Norton or McAfee and am well satisfied with MSE.



Bill
 
OT: Re: PC TuneUp and CCleaner

"PA Bear [MS MVP]" écrivait

news:euQS$yO$KHA.1700@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:



> Doum wrote:

>

>> Out of curiosity, I downloaded and installed Ccleaner. After making

>> an image of my system drive, I ran CC registry cleaner, it found a

>> lot of stuff, associated extensions, useless DLLs, etc. I let it do

>> what it suggested.

>>

>> AFAICT, there's nothing broken but I don't see any performance

>> improvement so I think I'm gonna leave the registry alone in the

>> future but I will check out CC other features.


>

> Hopefully you paid attention to CCleaner's prompt to back-up the

> changes you were about to make and did so.




yes
 
Excuse my goof. I meant Microsoft Security Essentials ---not Windows

Security Essentials.

He-- getting old but, the alternative is most unpleasant..

"Billns" wrote in message

news:OcXoi6O$KHA.5476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> On 5/24/2010 11:18 AM, Unknown wrote:

>> I wouldn't bother with either one. I use WSE (Windows Security

>> Essentials)

>> "Sanford Aranoff" wrote in message

>> news:4BFAB9F1.9CB55E39@analysis-knowledge.com...

>>> What do you think of PC TuneUP for $50 or CCleaner for free?


>>

>>


> Microsoft Security Essentials and these two programs have different

> purposes. I haven't used PC Tuneup and use CCleaner very sparingly so I

> can't really comment on the merits of either. I use MSE rather than Norton

> or McAfee and am well satisfied with MSE.

>

> Bill
 
OT: Re: PC TuneUp and CCleaner

On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:40:07 -0700, Doum wrote:



>> Out of curiosity, I downloaded and installed Ccleaner. After making an


> image of my system drive, I ran CC registry cleaner, it found a lot of

> stuff, associated extensions, useless DLLs, etc. I let it do what it

> suggested.

>

> AFAICT, there's nothing broken






Good. Then you were lucky. None of us has ever claimed that using a

registry cleaner causes a problem every time. Rather, there's a *risk*

in using it, and there's no reason to take the risk since ...





> but I don't see any performance improvement






.... there's no corresponding benefit, and the gamble is therefore a

poor one.





> so I think I'm gonna leave the registry alone in the future






Good. That's the wise thing to do.





> but I will check out CC other features.






Also good. Almost everything else it does, it does well.







--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003

Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
OT: Re: PC TuneUp and CCleaner

In news:qn6rv5l3uddov1fcvhhvgc64edp173u9r2@4ax.com,

Ken Blake, MVP typed:

> On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:40:07 -0700, Doum

> wrote:

>

>>> Out of curiosity, I downloaded and installed Ccleaner.

>>> After making an


>> image of my system drive, I ran CC registry cleaner, it

>> found a lot of stuff, associated extensions, useless DLLs,

>> etc. I let it do what it suggested.

>>

>> AFAICT, there's nothing broken


>

>

> Good. Then you were lucky. None of us has ever claimed that

> using a registry cleaner causes a problem every time.

> Rather, there's a *risk* in using it, and there's no reason

> to take the risk since ...




Balderdash; exactly what would be expected.



>

>

>> but I don't see any performance improvement


>

>

> ... there's no corresponding benefit, and the gamble is

> therefore a poor one.




BS - and you know it.



>

>

>> so I think I'm gonna leave the registry alone in the future


>

>

> Good. That's the wise thing to do.

>

>

>> but I will check out CC other features.


>

>

> Also good. Almost everything else it does, it does well.




Everything it does it does well, dunderhead.



HTH,



Twayne`
 
OT: Re: PC TuneUp and CCleaner

In news:XnF9D8476BB346AAdoumdomainnet@207.46.248.16,

Doum typed:

> "Twayne" icrivait

> news:#DjO6D6#KHA.148@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

>

>> In news:%23FBs343%23KHA.3880@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl,

>> PA Bear [MS MVP] typed:

>>> [Here we go again...]


>>

>> Yes, here we go again: The closed minded idiots and closed

>> minded dummies who insist they are right in the face of

>> millions of satisfied users and mountains of evidence of

>> the success of such things. That site he references?

>> Wrtten by one of "his" gang of cohorts amongst their silly

>> little group here who want to libel the companies that

>> make such products. He and his cohorts will lie and

>> misinform to the very end even though most any service

>> shop makes good use of such tools and understands the

>> realities of "today". The most interesting thing about

>> these boobs is when you challenge them

>> to show some proof of their allegations, they point to the

>> below useless site or one other that exists which is the

>> same thing, and call that proof. They cannot even come

>> close to describing the mechanism of their claims as any

>> professional or logical thinking person would be able to

>> do.

>>

>> HTH,

>>

>> Twayne`

>> ...

>>

>> Boilerplate junk removed.

>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Sanford Aranoff wrote:

>>>> What do you think of PC TuneUP for $50 or CCleaner for

>>>> free?


>>

>>

>>


>

> Out of curiosity, I downloaded and installed Ccleaner.

> After making an image of my system drive, I ran CC registry

> cleaner, it found a lot of stuff, associated extensions,

> useless DLLs, etc. I let it do what it suggested.

>

> AFAICT, there's nothing broken but I don't see any

> performance improvement so I think I'm gonna leave the

> registry alone in the future but I will check out CC other

> features.




Sounds about right; that's what most people get. As a general rule, registry

cleaners do not increase the speed of anything in any noticeable way at

least.

It can come in pretty handy when you get a problem that keep eluding you

as either a "find" for the problem or at least an exclusion of the registry

as being the cause of it. Most sources of computer slowdowns are from

sources other than the registry.

--

Regards,



Tom1
 
On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group of closed minds

> who wish to malign and libel the companies that have sold millions of

> product to many, including those who repair computers and make good use of

> same.

>

>




Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this garbage are only

doing so in the hopes it trashes the system so they can go in and fix

the damage caused by these programs. Yes, sometimes they work, and yes,

they don't cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system and

when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD. Then of course

people like you go on and on about how wonderful these programs are and

how they NEVER do anything bad so what happens?



People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should be blaming

the snake oil product that screwed up their registry to begin with!
 
How did you find out what city I'm in? (just curious :-)



Unknown wrote:

> Last couple of days, right at 90 degrees but will cool down this weekend..

>

> "Bill in Co." wrote in message

> news:%23wVhFwF$KHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> It's a bit warm (but at least it's a dry heat) here. How about over

>> where

>> you are?

>> I don't think it's reached 90 or 100 today, which is nice.

>>

>> Unknown wrote:

>>> BTW-----How's the weather in Pueblo?

>>> "Bill in Co." wrote in message

>>> news:OonQp9C$KHA.5168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>> The term for this behavior is "projection": one projects onto others

>>>> what one denies lies within oneself.

>>>>

>>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>>> Please provide us the source of the data that proves millions of sold

>>>>> products.

>>>>> You keep speaking of closed minds. Everyone who disagrees with you has

>>>>> a closed mind?

>>>>> I suggest you study your ego.

>>>>>

>>>>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>>>>> news:%23ZJhfT6%23KHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group of closed

>>>>>> minds

>>>>>> who wish to malign and libel the companies that have sold millions of

>>>>>> product to many, including those who repair computers and make good

>>>>>> use of same.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>
 
I highlight your post then click 'file' (in Outlook Express). Click

properties then details.

The details of your post indicates the posting host was 67.190.90.13.

Then I use http://en.utrace.de/ to tell me where the posting host is.

Try it but don't tell anyone about it. LOL.

"Bill in Co." wrote in message

news:e5s1PWDALHA.5848@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> How did you find out what city I'm in? (just curious :-)

>

> Unknown wrote:

>> Last couple of days, right at 90 degrees but will cool down this

>> weekend..

>>

>> "Bill in Co." wrote in message

>> news:%23wVhFwF$KHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>> It's a bit warm (but at least it's a dry heat) here. How about over

>>> where

>>> you are?

>>> I don't think it's reached 90 or 100 today, which is nice.

>>>

>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>> BTW-----How's the weather in Pueblo?

>>>> "Bill in Co." wrote in message

>>>> news:OonQp9C$KHA.5168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>> The term for this behavior is "projection": one projects onto others

>>>>> what one denies lies within oneself.

>>>>>

>>>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>>>> Please provide us the source of the data that proves millions of sold

>>>>>> products.

>>>>>> You keep speaking of closed minds. Everyone who disagrees with you

>>>>>> has a closed mind?

>>>>>> I suggest you study your ego.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:%23ZJhfT6%23KHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group of closed

>>>>>>> minds

>>>>>>> who wish to malign and libel the companies that have sold millions

>>>>>>> of

>>>>>>> product to many, including those who repair computers and make good

>>>>>>> use of same.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>


>
 
In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

milt typed:

> On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>> of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>> that have sold millions of product to many, including

>> those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>

>>


>

> Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

> garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

> system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

> programs.




Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER charge

a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.



Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

> cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system




Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.



> and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.




Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with any

other software.



> Then of course people like you go on and on about how

> wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

> bad so what happens?




Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently do

NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create lies

and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>

> People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

> be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

> registry to begin with!




lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does EXACTLY

what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?
 
Twayne wrote:

> In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

> milt typed:

>> On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>>> of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>>> that have sold millions of product to many, including

>>> those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>>

>>>


>> Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

>> garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

>> system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

>> programs.


>

> Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER charge

> a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.

>

> Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

>> cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system


>

> Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

> haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.

>

>> and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.


>

> Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with any

> other software.

>

>> Then of course people like you go on and on about how

>> wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

>> bad so what happens?


>

> Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently do

> NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create lies

> and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>> People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

>> be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

>> registry to begin with!


>

> lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does EXACTLY

> what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?




No, it doesn't! When you uninstall a program an uninstall string is

launched by the uninstaller and a specific uninstall routine is

launched, often times the application has an install/uninstall log and

the installer will execute uninstall routines based on these logs or

based on other such files provided by the application vendor. In

addition to removing relevant registry entries the uninstaller also

removes files which were installed when the application was installed,

this is not restricted to the program's directory, the uninstaller

will/should also remove any dll or other files which might have been

created when the program was installed. Registry cleaners do nothing of

the such, but then none of us here would expect you to know any better,

you wear blinders and your ignorance in these matters is clearly evident.



John
 
"Twayne" wrote in message

news:e$1h60MALHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

> milt typed:

>> On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>>> of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>>> that have sold millions of product to many, including

>>> those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>>

>>>


>>

>> Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

>> garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

>> system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

>> programs.


>

> Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER

> charge a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.

>

> Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

>> cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system


>

> Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

> haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.

>

>> and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.


>

> Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with any

> other software.

>

>> Then of course people like you go on and on about how

>> wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

>> bad so what happens?


>

> Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently do

> NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create

> lies and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>>

>> People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

>> be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

>> registry to begin with!


>

> lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does EXACTLY

> what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?




A cleaner does the same as uninstalling a program is the most incorrect, bad

information you

have ever posted on these newsgroups other than the usefulness of registry

cleaners.

.. When are you going to quit making an idiot of yourself?
 
John John - MVP écrivait

news:#gekwANALHA.3176@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:





> In

> addition to removing relevant registry entries the uninstaller also

> removes files which were installed when the application was installed,

> this is not restricted to the program's directory, the uninstaller

> will/should also remove any dll or other files which might have been

> created when the program was installed.

>








> John

>




Question here, what if a dll is shared by other applications and an

uninstall procedure removes it, won't it screw up the other applications

that were using it?
 
Doum wrote:

> John John - MVP écrivait

> news:#gekwANALHA.3176@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

>

>

>> In

>> addition to removing relevant registry entries the uninstaller also

>> removes files which were installed when the application was installed,

>> this is not restricted to the program's directory, the uninstaller

>> will/should also remove any dll or other files which might have been

>> created when the program was installed.

>>


>

>

>

>> John

>>


>

> Question here, what if a dll is shared by other applications and an

> uninstall procedure removes it, won't it screw up the other applications

> that were using it?




It will almost always ask for delete confirmation if it thinks that the

file is shared, if you are unsure you can keep the file.



John
 
Unknown wrote:

> "Twayne" wrote in message

> news:e$1h60MALHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

>> milt typed:

>>> On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>>>> of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>>>> that have sold millions of product to many, including

>>>> those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

>>> garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

>>> system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

>>> programs.


>>

>> Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER

>> charge a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.

>>

>> Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

>>> cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system


>>

>> Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

>> haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.

>>

>>> and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.


>>

>> Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with any

>> other software.

>>

>>> Then of course people like you go on and on about how

>>> wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

>>> bad so what happens?


>>

>> Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently do

>> NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create

>> lies and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>>>

>>> People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

>>> be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

>>> registry to begin with!


>>

>> lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does EXACTLY

>> what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?


>

> A cleaner does the same as uninstalling a program is the most incorrect,

> bad

> information you

> have ever posted on these newsgroups other than the usefulness of registry

> cleaners.

> . When are you going to quit making an idiot of yourself?




2050?
 
In news:esMqsvMALHA.5536@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> I highlight your post then click 'file' (in Outlook

> Express). Click properties then details.

> The details of your post indicates the posting host was

> 67.190.90.13. Then I use http://en.utrace.de/ to tell me

> where the posting host is. Try it but don't tell anyone

> about it. LOL. "Bill in Co."

> wrote in message

> news:e5s1PWDALHA.5848@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> How did you find out what city I'm in? (just curious :-)




Not very accurate; careful of depending on it too much. It shows me in

Syracuse, too but in reality I am 120 miles north and a bit east of

Syracuse. You forget, that's the scope for the IP, not where the person

using the IP is. Tracert wll get you the same thing as will many other

programs. Tracking stops where the IP is living, not where the computer the

IP was assigned to is located.

And, IPs change periodically scheduled or otherwise with every time the

modem is reset/restarted/rebooted. There is no way of telling whether the

user you "located" was even assigned that IP at the time you looked; it

could have been someone else entirely. In 24 hours the IP will almost

certainly have changed and earlier if the user restarted/rebooted or used

ipconfig or depending on where it was in its 24 hr cycle.

Knowing the city does no good at all unless the person admits/volunteers

their own location in that city.

Anyone with Verizon in the whole northeast US could show as being located

in Syracuse - or Ottawa - or Rochester/Buffalo - or Toronto - or cities in

PA, CT, etc. etc. etc..



HTH,



Twayne`



>> Unknown wrote:

>>> Last couple of days, right at 90 degrees but will cool

>>> down this weekend..

>>>

>>> "Bill in Co." wrote in

>>> message news:%23wVhFwF$KHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>> It's a bit warm (but at least it's a dry heat) here. How about over

>>>> where

>>>> you are?

>>>> I don't think it's reached 90 or 100 today, which is

>>>> nice. Unknown wrote:

>>>>> BTW-----How's the weather in Pueblo?

>>>>> "Bill in Co." wrote in

>>>>> message news:OonQp9C$KHA.5168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>> The term for this behavior is "projection": one

>>>>>> projects onto others what one denies lies within

>>>>>> oneself. Unknown wrote:

>>>>>>> Please provide us the source of the data that proves

>>>>>>> millions of sold products.

>>>>>>> You keep speaking of closed minds. Everyone who

>>>>>>> disagrees with you has a closed mind?

>>>>>>> I suggest you study your ego.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:%23ZJhfT6%23KHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small

>>>>>>>> group of closed minds

>>>>>>>> who wish to malign and libel the companies that have

>>>>>>>> sold millions of

>>>>>>>> product to many, including those who repair

>>>>>>>> computers and make good use of same.
 
Will registry cleaners be extinct then?

"Bill in Co." wrote in message

news:eAB8CnQALHA.1892@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Unknown wrote:

>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>> news:e$1h60MALHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>> In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

>>> milt typed:

>>>> On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>>>>> Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>>>>> of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>>>>> that have sold millions of product to many, including

>>>>> those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

>>>> garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

>>>> system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

>>>> programs.

>>>

>>> Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER

>>> charge a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.

>>>

>>> Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

>>>> cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system

>>>

>>> Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

>>> haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.

>>>

>>>> and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.

>>>

>>> Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with

>>> any

>>> other software.

>>>

>>>> Then of course people like you go on and on about how

>>>> wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

>>>> bad so what happens?

>>>

>>> Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently

>>> do

>>> NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create

>>> lies and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>>>>

>>>> People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

>>>> be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

>>>> registry to begin with!

>>>

>>> lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does

>>> EXACTLY

>>> what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?


>>

>> A cleaner does the same as uninstalling a program is the most incorrect,

>> bad

>> information you

>> have ever posted on these newsgroups other than the usefulness of

>> registry

>> cleaners.

>> . When are you going to quit making an idiot of yourself?


>

> 2050?

>
 
As long as the marks keep appearing!



Unknown wrote:



> Will registry cleaners be extinct then?




> "Bill in Co." wrote in message

> news:eAB8CnQALHA.1892@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>

>>Unknown wrote:

>>

>>>"Twayne" wrote in message

>>>news:e$1h60MALHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>In news:%23stfHH0$KHA.3580@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

>>>>milt typed:

>>>>

>>>>>On 5/24/2010 7:54 PM, Twayne wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>Here's one of your major puppetmasters of this small group

>>>>>>of closed minds who wish to malign and libel the companies

>>>>>>that have sold millions of product to many, including

>>>>>>those who repair computers and make good use of same.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Anyone who repairs computers and sells people on this

>>>>>garbage are only doing so in the hopes it trashes the

>>>>>system so they can go in and fix the damage caused by these

>>>>>programs.

>>>>

>>>>Giving away your secrets, eh? No ethical scrupulouw person would EVER

>>>>charge a customer for any problems he caused, no matter what it was.

>>>>

>>>>Yes, sometimes they work, and yes, they don't

>>>>

>>>>>cause harm. However, they do NOTHING to speed up a system

>>>>

>>>>Speeding up a system is one of many, many things a cleaner might do. I

>>>>haven't seen anyone claim that in this thread either.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>and when they do screw up. They screw up your system BAD.

>>>>

>>>>Nope, just not true unless it's a no-name from junk.com, same as with

>>>>any

>>>>other software.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>Then of course people like you go on and on about how

>>>>>wonderful these programs are and how they NEVER do anything

>>>>>bad so what happens?

>>>>

>>>>Those are lies. I never said they were "wonderful" and they inherently

>>>>do

>>>>NOT do anything "bad". Your reading comprehension forces you to create

>>>>lies and misinterpret what was said; you need help.

>>>>

>>>>>People blame Microsoft for their problems! When they should

>>>>>be blaming the snake oil product that screwed up their

>>>>>registry to begin with!

>>>>

>>>>lol, you're maroon for sure. When you unnstall a program, it does

>>>>EXACTLY

>>>>what a cleaner would do. Should we stop uninstalling programs?

>>>

>>>A cleaner does the same as uninstalling a program is the most incorrect,

>>>bad

>>>information you

>>>have ever posted on these newsgroups other than the usefulness of

>>>registry

>>>cleaners.

>>>. When are you going to quit making an idiot of yourself?


>>

>>2050?

>>


>

>

>
 
Unknown wrote:

> Will registry cleaners be extinct then?

>






Not as long as there are suckers to fall for the bogus claims of the

unscrupulous hucksters who peddle them.





--



Bruce Chambers



Help us help you:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin



Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell



The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

killed a great many philosophers.

~ Denis Diderot
 
Back
Top