B
Bert Hyman
Guest
In news:65kq06pa6ehn0gmtk8h1pre1glauhlp8b9@4ax.com Tim Slattery
wrote:
> "Spamlet" wrote:
>
>>Having now discovered eternal-september and found these groups still
>>going there including microsoft.public.outlook, which disappeared from
>>it's usual place yesterday (and prompted my following this thread): do
>>I now need to bother with these 'bridges' at all?
>
> No. The bridges let you access the MS web forums using your
> newsreader. If you're happy with the groups you've found, you don't
> need to worry about them.
>
However, unless someone's going to the trouble of pushing all traffic in
the Web forums out into USENET, nothing that's posted in any of the
forums will show up in any of the microsoft.* newsgroups you'll find in
the outside world. And, nothing you post in any microsoft.* newsgroup in
the outside world will find its way into any forum.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com
wrote:
> "Spamlet" wrote:
>
>>Having now discovered eternal-september and found these groups still
>>going there including microsoft.public.outlook, which disappeared from
>>it's usual place yesterday (and prompted my following this thread): do
>>I now need to bother with these 'bridges' at all?
>
> No. The bridges let you access the MS web forums using your
> newsreader. If you're happy with the groups you've found, you don't
> need to worry about them.
>
However, unless someone's going to the trouble of pushing all traffic in
the Web forums out into USENET, nothing that's posted in any of the
forums will show up in any of the microsoft.* newsgroups you'll find in
the outside world. And, nothing you post in any microsoft.* newsgroup in
the outside world will find its way into any forum.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com