My zero-defect Vista - let the flames begin!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henry
  • Start date Start date
Frank wrote:
> GO wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> here@home.again wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Alias" showed his hand...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The ONLY people who have to prove they're not a thief are paying
>>>>> customers. Not one cracked version of XP or Vista needs activation
>>>>> you moron!
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're assuming Vista works without activation. Either you don't
>>>> know and just think so because someone else says so, or you _are_ a
>>>> thief. Plain and simple, even for you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...good one! :-)
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Oh yeah....real good one. There's any number of ways to know Vista
>> works without activation without actually having a copy yourself.
>>
>>
>
> Oh? And what might those be?
> Well...?
> Frank

Oh, I don't know....like reading stuff or perhaps even witnessing it?
 
Frank wrote:
> GO wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>
>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with
>>> it, once and for all.
>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for
>>> use, you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any
>>> warning stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time
>>> as you prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT
>>> THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>> time you use them, correct?
>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>> totally meaningless!
>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>
>>
>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>> rest. A car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually
>> call back to the seller and make you verify that you bought said
>> item.
>>
>>
>>
> hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!
> Frank

Where did I ever say anything about running them without a key?
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> GO wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,
>>>> once and for all.
>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,
>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning
>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you
>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE
>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>>> time you use them, correct?
>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>>> totally meaningless!
>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>
>>>
>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>> rest. A
>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the
>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You noticed that too, eh?
>>
>> Alias
>
> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want to
> use any of them...hahaha...lol!
> Frank

Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which is
copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples, once you
install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not permission from
Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change spark plugs or oil?

Alias
 
GO wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> GO wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with
>>>> it, once and for all.
>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for
>>>> use, you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any
>>>> warning stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time
>>>> as you prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT
>>>> THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>>> time you use them, correct?
>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>>> totally meaningless!
>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>
>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>> rest. A car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually
>>> call back to the seller and make you verify that you bought said
>>> item.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!
>> Frank
>
> Where did I ever say anything about running them without a key?
>
>
>

Frank's usual tactic when refuted is to change the subject and ignore
the refutation.

Alias
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with
>>> it, once and for all.
>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>> physical key.
>>
>>
>> Apples/oranges.
>>
>>> When you open a bank account you're given a numerical key that
>>> identifies your account.
>>
>>
>> Apples/oranges.
>>
>>> When you purchase software for use, you're given a CD key.
>>
>>
>> Sometimes but I avoid that kind of software.
>>
>>> None of these "keys" come with any warning stating that you are
>>> considered a "thief" until such time as you prove otherwise.
>>
>>
>> It's implied.
>>
>>> And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each
>>> and every time you use your car, motorcycle, enter your house, or
>>> access your bank account, correct?
>>
>>
>> Apples/oranges.
>>
>>> None of them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief
>>> each time you use them, correct?
>>
>>
>> Apples/oranges.
>>
>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>> totally meaningless!
>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>
>>
>> You're not a thief. You are an idiot incapable of logic.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But, then again, your posts don't show much
>>>
>>>> intelligence so the dots are easy to connect.
>>>
>>>
>>> Connecting any dots of the truth seems to be a real problems for you.
>>
>>
>> Only in Frank's World.
>>
>>>>
>>>> I just visited a neighbor of mine and he told me that he would
>>>> never, ever get Vista and so I installed Ubuntu for him and he loves
>>>> it. He's got over a hundred contacts all over the world through IM
>>>> that he told me he will tell about Ubuntu and get them to try it
>>>> too. When was the last time you saw this kind of enthusiasm for
>>>> Windows, 95?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm real happy for you and him!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is this news? Because for the first time in history, there's an
>>>> OS that anyone except you can install...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ut,ut,ut...lying again alias. I've used linux long before you've ever
>>> even heard of it. You're only making a stupid fool out of yourself by
>>> saying that. But don't let me stand in your way of making a fool out
>>> of yourself. You're very good at ti!
>>
>>
>> You've admitted right here that you couldn't install Ubuntu.
>>
>>>
>>> and use besides Mac that is giving
>>>
>>>> competition to MS.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is? Nope, wrong again.
>>>
>>> Vista use grows as Mac OS X stays flat
>>>
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action...Name=windows&articleId=9027558&taxonomyId=125
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> That's because of people opting for Ubuntu, of course!
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Linux wasn't ready for the masses until recently.
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong again!
>>
>>
>> Um, you're wrong, sorry. Live with it.
>>
>> Snip the usual insults.
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> You can no longer defend your lies nor can you accept the truth.
> We now see this response from you all the time.
> It's disappointing, as you've previously presented yourself as a
> mentally aware individual.
> I'm now very clear that you're not quite what you purport to be.
> You're a charlatan.
> IOW you're actually rather stupid, quite dumb, ignorant and little slow,
> yet you think you're brilliant!
> Aaahhh, the biggest fool is the one who fools himself.
> Well, that's life pal.
> Anything you say in the future will be graded against what you really
> are...nothing but a lying linux loser.
> No more, no less.
> Live with it as it’s the bed you’ve made and you must now sleep in it.
> Too bad (for you!).
> Frank
>
>

Translation: Frank can't refute my argument so he engages in a pseudo
psychoanalysis of me and, naturally, his usual insults.

Alias
 
Mike wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message
> news:OqPKenlzHHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> No, of course not. That's when MS starting pushing the envelop and,
>> sigh, like I said, xp.general was not full of Linux posts. At the
>> beginning it was stick with 98 or W2K. Are you dense?
>
> No, but you sure are. Still pimping an OS that no one is interested
> in. How much are you being paid by "Ubuntu" to infiltrate MS newsgroups?

Um, pimps make money when they pimp. I make no money by posting here. I
don't know anyone who runs Ubuntu. Course, like Frank, you think it cute
and clever to lie and insult those who you cannot refute.

>
>> You're lamely trying to trot out a straw man. Please. If everyone
>> adopts Linux, no pirates for sure ;-)
>
> But see, no one is adopting Linux:
>
> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/rep...&qpdt=1&qpct=3&qpcal=1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=101
>
>
> Linux is behind Windows98, for god's sake. Just slightly above NT and
> ME. All dead OSes.
>
> Must make you mighty proud to be getting paid by a company going down
> the toilet!
>
> Mike

Would you commit hari kari if Linux takes over the desktop/laptop business?

Alias
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ......It's MUCH easier than Windows to install....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BS liar!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not BS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry pal, but that's one big lie!
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, pay, but you're wrong (again)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On this very computer, it took me a couple of days to install
>>>>>> Windows XP, Office and all my programs. Ubuntu took less than
>>>>>> three hours, including all the updates, programs, Beryl,
>>>>>> gDesklets, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just because you're too stoopid to install Ubuntu doesn't mean
>>>>>> that everyone is as much a lamer as you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't change the subject. Installing the OS is the subject matter.
>>>>> Nothing is easier to install than Vista...nothing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>>> Oh...sorry, I forgot you've never installed Vista so how would you
>>>>> even know...lol!
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No driver here, no driver there, no quick books here, no Adobe
>>>> there. Puhlease, Vista won't be easy to install until at least SP1
>>>> if not SP2. Even rigs that come with Vista pre-installed have
>>>> problems right out of the box. A friend of mine bought a lap top
>>>> with Vista. He looked at it and shut down. He tried to boot it up
>>>> again and, lo and behold, a BSOD. He's disgusted and went to
>>>> download Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oops?
>>> You don't have Vista...you've never installed Vista...you don't know
>>> what you're talking about.
>>> Oops!!!
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Your lame argument is that I haven't installed Vista. Do you think I
>> can't read? Do you think I don't know people who have installed Vista?
>> Your desperation at reaching for straws with this is obvious.
>>
>> Alias
>
> hahaha...I'm not the one who doesn't have the REAL Vista
> experience...hahaha...who are you trying to fool...cause you're only
> fooling yourself.
> You're the desperate fool, fool!
> Frank

Once again, old Frankie Boy, when soundly refuted, resorts to his old
and tired insults.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> GO wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,
>>>>> once and for all.
>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,
>>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning
>>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you
>>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE
>>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>>>> time you use them, correct?
>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>>>> totally meaningless!
>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>>> rest. A
>>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to
>>>> the
>>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You noticed that too, eh?
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want
>> to use any of them...hahaha...lol!
>> Frank
>
>
> Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which is
> copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples, once you
> install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not permission from
> Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change spark plugs or oil?
>
> Alias

Now who would've thought that my post would go right over your little
pointy head and you wouldn't even have to duck?
Can you image that?
Frank
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> once and for all.
>>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,
>>>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning
>>>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you
>>>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE
>>>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>>>>> time you use them, correct?
>>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>>>>> totally meaningless!
>>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>>>> rest. A
>>>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back
>>>>> to the
>>>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You noticed that too, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want
>>> to use any of them...hahaha...lol!
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which
>> is copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples,
>> once you install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not
>> permission from Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change
>> spark plugs or oil?
>>
>> Alias
>
> Now who would've thought that my post would go right over your little
> pointy head and you wouldn't even have to duck?
> Can you image that?
> Frank

Translation: Frank's been soundly refuted once again so he resorts to
insults as usual.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate
>>>>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your
>>>>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done
>>>>>>> with it,
>>>>>>> once and for all.
>>>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a
>>>>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical
>>>>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for
>>>>>>> use,
>>>>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning
>>>>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you
>>>>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE
>>>>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,
>>>>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of
>>>>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each
>>>>>>> time you use them, correct?
>>>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is
>>>>>>> totally meaningless!
>>>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>>>>> rest. A
>>>>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You noticed that too, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want
>>>> to use any of them...hahaha...lol!
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which
>>> is copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples,
>>> once you install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not
>>> permission from Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change
>>> spark plugs or oil?
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Now who would've thought that my post would go right over your little
>> pointy head and you wouldn't even have to duck?
>> Can you image that?
>> Frank
>
>
> Translation: Frank's been soundly refuted once again so he resorts to
> insults as usual.
>
> Alias

Translation: alias loses once again (as usual).
But we all know he's just a linux loser...hahaha...no big deal...lol!
Frank
 
"GO" muttered...
> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to rest. A
> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the
> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>

Ok, more software, less hardware. Subscribe to cable or satellite? Your
account includes the serial number and model codes for the converter
equipment you bought/rented. If your box goes bad, they replace it, but you
lose signal until their computer is updated with new codes. Once your new
equipment is electronically confirmed, your subscribed channels are
available. So, if you have to upgrade/update/replace hardware, you have to
re-activate with a new registration key to continue using it. Fortunately,
M$ licensed software is a one time fee, not a monthly subscription. ;-)
 
here@home.again wrote:
> "GO" muttered...
>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to rest. A
>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the
>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>
>
> Ok, more software, less hardware. Subscribe to cable or satellite? Your
> account includes the serial number and model codes for the converter
> equipment you bought/rented. If your box goes bad, they replace it, but you
> lose signal until their computer is updated with new codes. Once your new
> equipment is electronically confirmed, your subscribed channels are
> available. So, if you have to upgrade/update/replace hardware, you have to
> re-activate with a new registration key to continue using it. Fortunately,
> M$ licensed software is a one time fee, not a monthly subscription. ;-)
>
>

Fortunately Linux has no "one time" fee and no subscription.

Alias
 
"Alias" added...
> here@home.again wrote:
>> "GO" muttered...
>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to rest.
>>> A
>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the
>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, more software, less hardware. Subscribe to cable or satellite? Your
>> account includes the serial number and model codes for the converter
>> equipment you bought/rented. If your box goes bad, they replace it, but
>> you lose signal until their computer is updated with new codes. Once your
>> new equipment is electronically confirmed, your subscribed channels are
>> available. So, if you have to upgrade/update/replace hardware, you have
>> to re-activate with a new registration key to continue using it.
>> Fortunately, M$ licensed software is a one time fee, not a monthly
>> subscription. ;-)
>
> Fortunately Linux has no "one time" fee and no subscription.
>
> Alias


And no users. A loose group of fanboys, sure, but if it ever makes to a
double digit maket share then I'll take it seriously. :p
 
Alias wrote:
> GO wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> GO wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they
>>>>>> activate and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR
>>>>>> and your support for it is even more stupid.
>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with
>>>>> it, once and for all.
>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're
>>>>> given a physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a
>>>>> numerical key that identifies your account. When you purchase
>>>>> software for use, you're given a CD key. None of these "keys"
>>>>> come with any warning stating that you are considered a "thief"
>>>>> until such time as you prove otherwise. And you must use all of
>>>>> these keys, EXCEPT THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use
>>>>> your car, motorcycle, enter your house, or access your bank
>>>>> account, correct? None of them...in any way, shape or form, label
>>>>> or calls you a thief each time you use them, correct?
>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is
>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it
>>>>> is totally meaningless!
>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!
>>>>
>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to
>>>> rest. A car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually
>>>> call back to the seller and make you verify that you bought said
>>>> item.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!
>>> Frank
>>
>> Where did I ever say anything about running them without a key?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Frank's usual tactic when refuted is to change the subject and ignore
> the refutation.
>
> Alias

Yeah, I realized that. I think my new tactic is just going to be to ignore
him. I enjoy these little debates and don't even have a problem admitting
when I'm wrong, but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I think
I've ever heard.
 
GO wrote:
....but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
> I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I think
> I've ever heard.
>

Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
Frank
>
>
 
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:12:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>GO wrote:
>...but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
>> I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I think
>> I've ever heard.
>>
>
>Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
>Frank

You're understood perfectly Frank. You're just a idiot with a BIG
mouth.
 
GO wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>>GO wrote:
>>...but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
>>
>>>I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I
>>>think I've ever heard.
>>>
>>
>>Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
>>Frank
>
>
> Sorry Frank. You're the one with problems understanding things. Your
> analogy was quite clear, but wrong. Better luck next time.
>
>
heheheh...so you still think MS thinks you're a thief because you have
to activate Vista?
Is that correct?
Frank
 
Frank wrote:
> GO wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> GO wrote:
>>> ...but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
>>>
>>>> I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I
>>>> think I've ever heard.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Sorry Frank. You're the one with problems understanding things. Your
>> analogy was quite clear, but wrong. Better luck next time.
>>
>>
> heheheh...so you still think MS thinks you're a thief because you have
> to activate Vista?
> Is that correct?
> Frank

The only thing you should have to do to "activate" Vista is turn the
computer on.

Alias
 
Frank wrote:
> GO wrote:
> ...but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
>> I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I
>> think I've ever heard.
>>
>
> Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
> Frank

Sorry Frank. You're the one with problems understanding things. Your
analogy was quite clear, but wrong. Better luck next time.
 
Adam Albright wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:12:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:
>
>> GO wrote:
>> ...but trying to debate with someone like Frank is pointless.
>>> I mean, just look at his last analogy....it's the silliest thing I
>>> think I've ever heard.
>>>
>>
>> Translation: you didn't understand one bit of it!
>> Frank
>
> You're understood perfectly Frank. You're just a idiot with a BIG
> mouth.

Thank you. Save me from resorting to that ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top