Looking for a tool

  • Thread starter Thread starter John
  • Start date Start date
Do you use a time base for everything? Are you paid by the hour?

"Terry R." wrote in message

news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard

>>>

>>>> You assume far too much.

>>>

>>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did

>>> what?

>>>

>>>

>>> Terry R.

>>

>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to

>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It is

>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a third-party

>> tool does not make it less correct.

>

> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm

> sticking with my recommendation.

>

> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest

> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF

> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're

> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I suggested.

>

> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a "tool"

> (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at once AND

> displayed the results for ALL.

>

> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>

>

> Terry R.

> --

> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
"Terry R." wrote in message

news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard

>>>

>>>> You assume far too much.

>>>

>>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did

>>> what?

>>>

>>>

>>> Terry R.

>>

>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to

>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It

>> is

>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a

>> third-party

>> tool does not make it less correct.

>

> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm

> sticking with my recommendation.

>

> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest

> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF

> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're

> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I

> suggested.

>

> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a

> "tool" (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at

> once AND displayed the results for ALL.

>

> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...



You can recommend whatever you like....the only one in this thread

bad-mouthing other replies is you, d00d....and you are still going on

about it.



I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a

plain-text newsgroup post, made through a newsserver, posting with a

newsreader set to plain text. I don't know what newsreader you are

using, that shows plain text posts as HTML...maybe you should fix your

reader or your settings to display correctly?

--

Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009

A+

http://dts-l.net/
 
"glee" wrote in message

news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...



>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread ...

....

>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

....

> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a

> plain-text newsgroup post, ...



Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your opening

tag.
 
SHE??????????

"Greg Russell" wrote in message

news:80jbivFi50U1@mid.individual.net...

> "glee" wrote in message

> news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>

>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread ...

> ...

>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

> ...

>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a

>> plain-text newsgroup post, ...

>

> Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your opening

> tag.

>

>
 
"Greg Russell" wrote in message

news:80jbivFi50U1@mid.individual.net...

> "glee" wrote in message

> news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>

>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread

>>>> ...

> ...

>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

> ...

>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in

>> a

>> plain-text newsgroup post, ...

>

> Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your

> opening

> tag.



can be used for things other than tags....for instance, as a

comment, such as which would not require a closing

because it's a comment not a tag. was a comment. I must have

missed that it was meant in humour due to the lack of an indication such

as a smiley or a comment....or are you going to tell me that

is a tag and must be closed too??

That's a BTW, FWIW :)

--

Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009

A+

http://dts-l.net/
 
On 3/19/2010 1:38 PM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard



> Do you use a time base for everything? Are you paid by the hour?

> "Terry R." wrote in message

> news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>>> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard

>>>>

>>>>> You assume far too much.

>>>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did

>>>> what?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Terry R.

>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to

>>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It is

>>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a third-party

>>> tool does not make it less correct.

>> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm

>> sticking with my recommendation.

>>

>> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest

>> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF

>> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're

>> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I suggested.

>>

>> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a "tool"

>> (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at once AND

>> displayed the results for ALL.

>>

>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>>

>>

>> Terry R.

>



I charge by the hour, so yes.





Terry R.

--

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
On 3/19/2010 9:37 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard



> "Terry R." wrote in message

> news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>>> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard

>>>>

>>>>> You assume far too much.

>>>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did

>>>> what?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Terry R.

>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to

>>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It

>>> is

>>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a

>>> third-party

>>> tool does not make it less correct.

>> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm

>> sticking with my recommendation.

>>

>> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest

>> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF

>> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're

>> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I

>> suggested.

>>

>> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a

>> "tool" (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at

>> once AND displayed the results for ALL.

>>

>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>





> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a

> plain-text newsgroup post, made through a newsserver, posting with a

> newsreader set to plain text. I don't know what newsreader you are

> using, that shows plain text posts as HTML...maybe you should fix your

> reader or your settings to display correctly?



You obviously don't know HOW to code HTML or you would have understood

my joke. Sorry you didn't get it...





Terry R.

--

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
On 3/20/2010 10:21 AM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard



> "Greg Russell" wrote in message

> news:80jbivFi50U1@mid.individual.net...

>> "glee" wrote in message

>> news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread

>>>>> ...

>> ...

>>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>> ...

>>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in

>>> a

>>> plain-text newsgroup post, ...

>> Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your

>> opening

>> tag.

>

> can be used for things other than tags....for instance, as a

> comment, such as which would not require a closing

> because it's a comment not a tag. was a comment. I must have

> missed that it was meant in humour due to the lack of an indication such

> as a smiley or a comment....or are you going to tell me that

> is a tag and must be closed too??

> That's a BTW, FWIW :)



Do you need a smiley to recognize something as humor? How sad...







Terry R.

--

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
"Terry R." wrote in message

news:eKgkubVyKHA.1548@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> On 3/19/2010 9:37 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>> news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>>>

>>>> "Terry R." wrote in message

>>>> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the

>>>>> keyboard

>>>>>

>>>>>> You assume far too much.

>>>>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts

>>>>> did

>>>>> what?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Terry R.

>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread

>>>> to

>>>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>>>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time.

>>>> It

>>>> is

>>>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a

>>>> third-party

>>>> tool does not make it less correct.

>>> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed,

>>> I'm

>>> sticking with my recommendation.

>>>

>>> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely

>>> suggest

>>> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good

>>> IF

>>> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize

>>> you're

>>> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I

>>> suggested.

>>>

>>> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a

>>> "tool" (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry

>>> at

>>> once AND displayed the results for ALL.

>>>

>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>>

>

>

>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in

>> a

>> plain-text newsgroup post, made through a newsserver, posting with a

>> newsreader set to plain text. I don't know what newsreader you are

>> using, that shows plain text posts as HTML...maybe you should fix

>> your

>> reader or your settings to display correctly?

>

> You obviously don't know HOW to code HTML or you would have understood

> my joke. Sorry you didn't get it...





Yes I do know how to code HTML, and I wasn't coding HTML in the post, so

I did not catch the connection you were trying to make. As I stated

elsewhere, it was a comment, not a tag. Not that I didn't get it...it

just wasn't a very good joke.
 
"Terry R." wrote in message

news:%23QVqPeVyKHA.5036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> On 3/20/2010 10:21 AM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> "Greg Russell" wrote in message

>> news:80jbivFi50U1@mid.individual.net...

>>> "glee" wrote in message

>>> news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this

>>>>>> thread

>>>>>> ...

>>> ...

>>>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>>> ...

>>>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags

>>>> in

>>>> a

>>>> plain-text newsgroup post, ...

>>> Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your

>>> opening

>>> tag.

>>

>> can be used for things other than tags....for instance,

>> as a

>> comment, such as which would not require a

>> closing

>> because it's a comment not a tag. was a comment. I must

>> have

>> missed that it was meant in humour due to the lack of an indication

>> such

>> as a smiley or a comment....or are you going to tell me that

>> is a tag and must be closed too??

>> That's a BTW, FWIW :)

>

> Do you need a smiley to recognize something as humor? How sad...



Not at all.... a statement made in written text can be read literally as

well as with humour. I had no reason to assume you meant it

humourously, based on the attitude of the rest of your post.



....and now you continue to troll, as you have been through this entire

thread.

--

Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009

A+

http://dts-l.net/
 
In news:eIGVVrVyKHA.5776@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

glee typed:



> ...and now you continue to troll, as you have been through this entire

> thread.



.... and he ropes you in every single time, moron.
 
"glee" wrote in message

news:eIGVVrVyKHA.5776@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...



> ...and now you continue to troll, as you have been through this entire

> thread.



Assuming you are an intelligent person, do you know what you can do?



By the way, why were you kicked out of the Society of Pigs? Is it because

you were a complete and utter useless nutter?
 
On 3/21/2010 5:52 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard



>>>>> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread

>>>>> to

>>>>> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong.

>>>>> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time.

>>>>> It

>>>>> is

>>>>> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a

>>>>> third-party

>>>>> tool does not make it less correct.

>>>> Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed,

>>>> I'm

>>>> sticking with my recommendation.

>>>>

>>>> You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely

>>>> suggest

>>>> regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good

>>>> IF

>>>> you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize

>>>> you're

>>>> using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I

>>>> suggested.

>>>>

>>>> I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a

>>>> "tool" (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry

>>>> at

>>>> once AND displayed the results for ALL.

>>>>

>>>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding...

>>

>>

>>> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in

>>> a

>>> plain-text newsgroup post, made through a newsserver, posting with a

>>> newsreader set to plain text. I don't know what newsreader you are

>>> using, that shows plain text posts as HTML...maybe you should fix

>>> your

>>> reader or your settings to display correctly?

>> You obviously don't know HOW to code HTML or you would have understood

>> my joke. Sorry you didn't get it...

>

>

> Yes I do know how to code HTML, and I wasn't coding HTML in the post, so

> I did not catch the connection you were trying to make. As I stated

> elsewhere, it was a comment, not a tag. Not that I didn't get it...it

> just wasn't a very good joke.

>



It was a good joke. But one has to understand it in order to see the humor.



I'm done. Move on Glen...





Terry R.

--

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top