pat wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:20:09 -0400, "Daave" wrote:
>
>> Greg Russell wrote:
>>> "Daave" wrote in message
>>> news:ukvN2Z1BLHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>> Yes. It doesn't even have to be an "upgrade CD." As long as you
>>>> have the SP3 .exe file (say, for instance, on a flash drive), you
>>>> can copy it to the hard drive and double-click it.
>>>
>>> And why would one need to "copy it to the hard drive" before
>>> executing the file by double-clicking it? Do you really believe that
>>> executable files can't be run from any other storage device?
>>
>> That would certainly be an option, too. I happen to like storing
>> installation files in an installation folder on the hard drive. This
>> way if the file on the flash drive disappears, it doesn't need to be
>> re-downloaded. Just my particular quirk and not necessary as you have
>> pointed out.
>>
>> That being said, I would imagine the installation would be quicker if
>> not installing directly from a flash drive. But that's only a guess.
>> If others have tried both ways, I'd like to know what their
>> experiences were.
>>
> I have it both ways, many times. It is much faster from the
> harddrive.
That's what I figured. Of course, you need to factor in the length of
time to copy the file from the flash drive to the hard drive. But that's
still my preference.