General Question <XP vs 7>

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Baka
  • Start date Start date
On 6/19/2010 3:43 PM, Alias wrote:

> On 06/19/2010 07:13 PM, Frank wrote:

>> On 6/19/2010 1:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 06/18/2010 11:20 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 6/18/2010 1:16 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>> On 6/18/2010 12:12 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>> Are you sure about your CPU? I don't think the XP 3800+ even exist,

>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>> I might be wrong. >>>>>

>>>>>>> You're wrong, of course:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> And:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=amd+...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> That is NOT what the OP identified his CPU as being.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Can't read or you're just too frightened to go to a web site that

>>>>> you're

>>>>> not familiar with?

>>>>>

>>>> You're the *DUMB FUCK* who obviously can't read.

>>>> The correct name of the processor the OP was apparently or apparently

>>>> referring to is:

>>>>

>>>> AMD Athlon X2 3800+

>>>>

>>>> The OP posted:

>>>>

>>>> dual core XP 3800+

>>>>

>>>> Which does not properly identify his processor.

>>>>

>>>> You even dumber than anyone originally thought you were.

>>>> Oops!

>>>

>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>

>>> The correct nomenclature is AMD XP 3800+ X2. Now STFU.

>>>


>> hehehe...got you panties all in a bunch sheep-fucker?

>> Too bad I kicked your lamer ass again! I was right and you stuck your

>> ignorant nose in where it didn't and made a fol out of yourself.

>> Now you STFU asshole!


>

> No, you're wrong but I guess you're too scared to click on a Usenet URL.

> What a baby.

>


No. I was right and clicking on that URL proves it.
 
On 06/20/2010 01:23 AM, Frank wrote:

> On 6/19/2010 3:43 PM, Alias wrote:

>> On 06/19/2010 07:13 PM, Frank wrote:

>>> On 6/19/2010 1:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>> On 06/18/2010 11:20 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>>> On 6/18/2010 1:16 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>> On 6/18/2010 12:12 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>> Are you sure about your CPU? I don't think the XP 3800+ even exist,

>>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>>> I might be wrong. >>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're wrong, of course:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> And:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=amd+...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> That is NOT what the OP identified his CPU as being.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Can't read or you're just too frightened to go to a web site that

>>>>>> you're

>>>>>> not familiar with?

>>>>>>

>>>>> You're the *DUMB FUCK* who obviously can't read.

>>>>> The correct name of the processor the OP was apparently or apparently

>>>>> referring to is:

>>>>>

>>>>> AMD Athlon X2 3800+

>>>>>

>>>>> The OP posted:

>>>>>

>>>>> dual core XP 3800+

>>>>>

>>>>> Which does not properly identify his processor.

>>>>>

>>>>> You even dumber than anyone originally thought you were.

>>>>> Oops!

>>>>

>>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>>

>>>> The correct nomenclature is AMD XP 3800+ X2. Now STFU.

>>>>

>>> hehehe...got you panties all in a bunch sheep-fucker?

>>> Too bad I kicked your lamer ass again! I was right and you stuck your

>>> ignorant nose in where it didn't and made a fol out of yourself.

>>> Now you STFU asshole!


>>

>> No, you're wrong but I guess you're too scared to click on a Usenet URL.

>> What a baby.

>>


> No. I was right and clicking on that URL proves it.




Can't read due to old age, stupidity or stubbornness?



--

Alias
 
On 6/20/2010 2:22 AM, Alias wrote:

> On 06/20/2010 01:23 AM, Frank wrote:

>> On 6/19/2010 3:43 PM, Alias wrote:

>>> On 06/19/2010 07:13 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>> On 6/19/2010 1:12 AM, Alias wrote:

>>>>> On 06/18/2010 11:20 PM, Frank wrote:

>>>>>> On 6/18/2010 1:16 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2010 12:12 PM, Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Are you sure about your CPU? I don't think the XP 3800+ even

>>>>>>>>> exist,

>>>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>>>> I might be wrong. >>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're wrong, of course:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> And:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=amd+...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> That is NOT what the OP identified his CPU as being.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Can't read or you're just too frightened to go to a web site that

>>>>>>> you're

>>>>>>> not familiar with?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> You're the *DUMB FUCK* who obviously can't read.

>>>>>> The correct name of the processor the OP was apparently or apparently

>>>>>> referring to is:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> AMD Athlon X2 3800+

>>>>>>

>>>>>> The OP posted:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> dual core XP 3800+

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Which does not properly identify his processor.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You even dumber than anyone originally thought you were.

>>>>>> Oops!

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.smartoffice.gr/cpu_amd3800x2.htm

>>>>>

>>>>> The correct nomenclature is AMD XP 3800+ X2. Now STFU.

>>>>>

>>>> hehehe...got you panties all in a bunch sheep-fucker?

>>>> Too bad I kicked your lamer ass again! I was right and you stuck your

>>>> ignorant nose in where it didn't and made a fol out of yourself.

>>>> Now you STFU asshole!

>>>

>>> No, you're wrong but I guess you're too scared to click on a Usenet URL.

>>> What a baby.

>>>


>> No. I was right and clicking on that URL proves it.


>

> Can't read due to old age, stupidity or stubbornness?

>


hehehe...you're projecting again cock sucker!...hahaha.
 
Back
Top