U
Unknown
Guest
When a technology (such as cassette tapes) is superseded by a newer
technology (such as CD's) you have the knack of
being EXTREMELY negative of the older technology and preach how bad they
were even though billions of
cassettes and floppies were used and sold.
What on earth will you spout off when the internal combustion engine is
superseded by a newer technology?
Yet, you take the worst possible technology (registry cleaners) and praise
them. Pelosi. (BS).
"Twayne" wrote in message
news:%23XH62z%23vKHA.3536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> In news:Oyzzca5vKHA.1692@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl,
> Unknown typed:
>> No idea where you get your specs. I have floppies over ten
>> years old and still working great.
>> Magnetic media? Disks can retain their data for many years.
>> Tapes? I have 8 tracks and cassettes
>> over 25 years old and still working.
>
> You're either a liar, have very expensive hi Qual floppies and tapes kept
> in an environmentally controlled room and they're never accessed (in which
> case you can't know they're good), or haven't looked at them in over 8
> years. Those "specs" are very easy to find on the 'net, are well known
> (and vary some but not by magnitudes or anything close to what you
> alleged) if you want to look for them. I'll bet a floppy by floppy
> complete access test comes up corrupted on most of them.
>
> Twayne`
>
>> "Twayne" wrote in message
>> news:OIzNkRyvKHA.732@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Unknown, you may already know, but ... floppies lose their
>>> magnetic properties over time (thus they become unusable
>>> or the data corrupts). It starts at about two month point
>>> depending on the quality and age of the floppy, usually
>>> being closer to 6 months for el-cheapos and around a year
>>> for higher quality with good care. Before data corrupts, I
>>> mean. To prevent that, it's best to copy them to CD/DVD for long
>>> term storage. It's quick & easy to make a new floppy.
>>>
>>> The way to keep the floppy "refreshed" is to copy all the
>>> data off it to your hard drive and then simply copy all
>>> the data back to the floppy. In business, we used to do
>>> that monthly. I'd still do it monthly if I wanted a floppy
>>> to persist for the long term. But don't let the floppy be
>>> the only copy of the files; back them up too so you can
>>> always make another floppy. In the real world, I
>>> discovered a cache of about 100 floppies, some with some
>>> interesting files on them, and after over 5 years, still
>>> managed to get the data off over 55% of them. I was
>>> astonished! The software I used was a 100-pass program:
>>> It would try to read the data 100 times and then pick the
>>> sequence with the same identical data per try, and if it
>>> was over a certain number, call that the "data". It was
>>> surprisingly accurate for some of the "iffy" floppies. Now I have them
>>> on CD-R for long term storage - fun to
>>> play with sometimes. HTH,
>>>
>>> Twayne`
>>>
>>>
>>> n news:ueN8VdvvKHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,
>>> Unknown typed:
>>>> The manufacturer of my computer updates my BIOS by me
>>>> downloading the update which is
>>>> written to a floppy. I then boot with the floppy inserted
>>>> and my BIOS is updated.
>>>> Should something happen to my BIOS, I have a copy of it on
>>>> a floppy. This is why I use a floppy in the 21st century.
>>>> "Gordon" wrote in message
>>>> news:OKB2gGkvKHA.5008@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Twayne" wrote in message
>>>>> news:Oi8QeCkvKHA.732@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But off topic and irrelevant since it has nothing to do
>>>>>> with the OPs query.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not at all. The question is - why would anyone want to
>>>>> use 1.44 MB floppy discs anyway in the 21st century?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
>>> through personal experience does not become a
>>> part of the moral tissue.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
> through personal experience does not become a
> part of the moral tissue.
technology (such as CD's) you have the knack of
being EXTREMELY negative of the older technology and preach how bad they
were even though billions of
cassettes and floppies were used and sold.
What on earth will you spout off when the internal combustion engine is
superseded by a newer technology?
Yet, you take the worst possible technology (registry cleaners) and praise
them. Pelosi. (BS).
"Twayne" wrote in message
news:%23XH62z%23vKHA.3536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> In news:Oyzzca5vKHA.1692@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl,
> Unknown typed:
>> No idea where you get your specs. I have floppies over ten
>> years old and still working great.
>> Magnetic media? Disks can retain their data for many years.
>> Tapes? I have 8 tracks and cassettes
>> over 25 years old and still working.
>
> You're either a liar, have very expensive hi Qual floppies and tapes kept
> in an environmentally controlled room and they're never accessed (in which
> case you can't know they're good), or haven't looked at them in over 8
> years. Those "specs" are very easy to find on the 'net, are well known
> (and vary some but not by magnitudes or anything close to what you
> alleged) if you want to look for them. I'll bet a floppy by floppy
> complete access test comes up corrupted on most of them.
>
> Twayne`
>
>> "Twayne" wrote in message
>> news:OIzNkRyvKHA.732@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Unknown, you may already know, but ... floppies lose their
>>> magnetic properties over time (thus they become unusable
>>> or the data corrupts). It starts at about two month point
>>> depending on the quality and age of the floppy, usually
>>> being closer to 6 months for el-cheapos and around a year
>>> for higher quality with good care. Before data corrupts, I
>>> mean. To prevent that, it's best to copy them to CD/DVD for long
>>> term storage. It's quick & easy to make a new floppy.
>>>
>>> The way to keep the floppy "refreshed" is to copy all the
>>> data off it to your hard drive and then simply copy all
>>> the data back to the floppy. In business, we used to do
>>> that monthly. I'd still do it monthly if I wanted a floppy
>>> to persist for the long term. But don't let the floppy be
>>> the only copy of the files; back them up too so you can
>>> always make another floppy. In the real world, I
>>> discovered a cache of about 100 floppies, some with some
>>> interesting files on them, and after over 5 years, still
>>> managed to get the data off over 55% of them. I was
>>> astonished! The software I used was a 100-pass program:
>>> It would try to read the data 100 times and then pick the
>>> sequence with the same identical data per try, and if it
>>> was over a certain number, call that the "data". It was
>>> surprisingly accurate for some of the "iffy" floppies. Now I have them
>>> on CD-R for long term storage - fun to
>>> play with sometimes. HTH,
>>>
>>> Twayne`
>>>
>>>
>>> n news:ueN8VdvvKHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,
>>> Unknown typed:
>>>> The manufacturer of my computer updates my BIOS by me
>>>> downloading the update which is
>>>> written to a floppy. I then boot with the floppy inserted
>>>> and my BIOS is updated.
>>>> Should something happen to my BIOS, I have a copy of it on
>>>> a floppy. This is why I use a floppy in the 21st century.
>>>> "Gordon" wrote in message
>>>> news:OKB2gGkvKHA.5008@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Twayne" wrote in message
>>>>> news:Oi8QeCkvKHA.732@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But off topic and irrelevant since it has nothing to do
>>>>>> with the OPs query.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not at all. The question is - why would anyone want to
>>>>> use 1.44 MB floppy discs anyway in the 21st century?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
>>> through personal experience does not become a
>>> part of the moral tissue.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
> through personal experience does not become a
> part of the moral tissue.