B
Bo Berglund
Guest
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:16:46 -0500, Leythos
wrote:
>In article , LD55ZRA@MAIL.COM says...
>>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>
>> >Outlook Express is a EMAIL program that MS "ADDED" Usenet access to -
>> >it's a crappy interface, always was, never will be good, only used by
>> >noobs....
>> >
>> >There are many real Usenet clients, free even...
>> >
>> >Gravity is free, text based, even does UU-Encoding if you're into
>> >downloading files, and it's not subject to the same problems that
>> >Outhouse is.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Do you strongly recommend Gravity then?
>
>I've been using it for a LONG time, maybe 10 years, when I had to buy
>it, before it because OpenSource.
>
>I like gravity because it shows the groups and threads in a manner that
>I would naturally expect them to be - as well as allowing multiple
>signatures on demand and it's FREE and very easy on resources.
>
>One other benefit is the ability to export and import the setup/Usenet
>counts on startup - since I have many computers, I have Gravity set to
>export the NEWSRC file to a network share on exit, on start it imports
>it, so this means I get the same read/unread from any computer in my
>location, I don't have to see ones I've already read just because I'm on
>a different computer.
I downloaded and tested Gravity as a comparison to Agent, but it did
not come out favourably....
I tried to reply to a post here and when I sent it there was after a
short while a message saying that it could not be sent. See event log
for details. Only there is nothing at all in the event log on my PC!
And furthermore the message I tried sending seems to have vanished for
good.
In Agent, the outgoing messages are kept until they are sent so you
can send them later. And they also are all in te "out box" so you can
load them again and edit and resend.
All of this sems to be sorely lacking in Gravity. :-(
Or I did not find it....
--
Bo Berglund (Sweden)
wrote:
>In article , LD55ZRA@MAIL.COM says...
>>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>
>> >Outlook Express is a EMAIL program that MS "ADDED" Usenet access to -
>> >it's a crappy interface, always was, never will be good, only used by
>> >noobs....
>> >
>> >There are many real Usenet clients, free even...
>> >
>> >Gravity is free, text based, even does UU-Encoding if you're into
>> >downloading files, and it's not subject to the same problems that
>> >Outhouse is.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Do you strongly recommend Gravity then?
>
>I've been using it for a LONG time, maybe 10 years, when I had to buy
>it, before it because OpenSource.
>
>I like gravity because it shows the groups and threads in a manner that
>I would naturally expect them to be - as well as allowing multiple
>signatures on demand and it's FREE and very easy on resources.
>
>One other benefit is the ability to export and import the setup/Usenet
>counts on startup - since I have many computers, I have Gravity set to
>export the NEWSRC file to a network share on exit, on start it imports
>it, so this means I get the same read/unread from any computer in my
>location, I don't have to see ones I've already read just because I'm on
>a different computer.
I downloaded and tested Gravity as a comparison to Agent, but it did
not come out favourably....
I tried to reply to a post here and when I sent it there was after a
short while a message saying that it could not be sent. See event log
for details. Only there is nothing at all in the event log on my PC!
And furthermore the message I tried sending seems to have vanished for
good.
In Agent, the outgoing messages are kept until they are sent so you
can send them later. And they also are all in te "out box" so you can
load them again and edit and resend.
All of this sems to be sorely lacking in Gravity. :-(
Or I did not find it....
--
Bo Berglund (Sweden)