XP Forgets Display Settings After Restart

  • Thread starter Thread starter xr280xr
  • Start date Start date
X

xr280xr

Guest
Hi,

I have dual displays at my computer and it has recently started "forgetting"

the display settings after I restart. Upon restarting once, only one monitor

will come up with a signal and I can't get it to output to the other monitor.

If I restart a second time, both monitors will have a signal but it has the

wrong montior set up as the primary monitor. What is supposed to be my second

monitor (the one w/ my desktop extended onto it) has my desktop icons and an

extra toolbar that I use. It's also oriented on the wrong side of what is

supposed to be my primary monitor. What's supposed to be the primary monitor,

still has the taskbar on it for some reason.



It's pretty annoying to have to reset all this every time I restart. Is

there some registry value I can set or clear to fix this?
 
And what are you using to provide multi monitor support, the software

supplied with your graphics card or win multi monitor?

Have you installed any driver updates from MSUpdate?



"xr280xr" wrote in message

news:426153BE-6C5F-4412-9462-681ABB6F4B99@microsoft.com...

> Hi,

> I have dual displays at my computer and it has recently started

> "forgetting"

> the display settings after I restart. Upon restarting once, only one

> monitor

> will come up with a signal and I can't get it to output to the other

> monitor.

> If I restart a second time, both monitors will have a signal but it has

> the

> wrong montior set up as the primary monitor. What is supposed to be my

> second

> monitor (the one w/ my desktop extended onto it) has my desktop icons and

> an

> extra toolbar that I use. It's also oriented on the wrong side of what is

> supposed to be my primary monitor. What's supposed to be the primary

> monitor,

> still has the taskbar on it for some reason.

>

> It's pretty annoying to have to reset all this every time I restart. Is

> there some registry value I can set or clear to fix this?
 
Thanks for your response. This never notifies me of replies and I can never

find my posts...



For multi monitor configuration I normally right click the

desktop>properties>settings. I have an nvidia quadro fx 570 card and the

nvidia control panel can set it up too.



I thought I had the problem resolved when I found that the Windows interface

somehow had conflicting settings with the nvidia control panel settings. But

I just installed a second video card and 3rd monitor and it all went to hell.

I currently have the 2nd video card disabled and the 3rd monitor unplugged

for simplifying troubleshooting. So I'm trying to get an Asus monitor, and a

dell monitor to display with the Asus as my primary monitor and the windows

desktop extended onto the Dell. Here are the latest symptoms:



-Dell monitor was originally plugged in and set as single primary monitor.

-Plugged in Asus monitor. No signal.

-Told windows to extend the desktop onto the Asus. It acts like it did, but

no signal.

-Told windows to make the Asus the primary and extend the desktop onto the

dell. No signal on the Asus and no desktop icons or start menu on the dell.

-Restarted, same problems after restart.

-Restarted with only the Asus plugged in. It displayed correctly and I

changed the resolution to the appropriate resolution.

-Plugged in the dell monitor and restarted.

-Dell monitor initialized first so I quickly restarted again before windows

loaded.

-Asus monitor initialized first, I saw the POST screen and the Windows

loading screen but the login screen then appeared on the Dell and Asus had no

signal! Furthermore the dell had the Asus' resolution.



For some reason it always wants to use the dell monitor and won't send

signal to the Asus. It also seems like it's getting the two mixed up. Is the

nvidia driver conflicting with windows or something? I have uninstalled the

nvidia driver all together and am re-installing now.





"DL" wrote:



> And what are you using to provide multi monitor support, the software

> supplied with your graphics card or win multi monitor?

> Have you installed any driver updates from MSUpdate?

>

> "xr280xr" wrote in message

> news:426153BE-6C5F-4412-9462-681ABB6F4B99@microsoft.com...

> > Hi,

> > I have dual displays at my computer and it has recently started

> > "forgetting"

> > the display settings after I restart. Upon restarting once, only one

> > monitor

> > will come up with a signal and I can't get it to output to the other

> > monitor.

> > If I restart a second time, both monitors will have a signal but it has

> > the

> > wrong montior set up as the primary monitor. What is supposed to be my

> > second

> > monitor (the one w/ my desktop extended onto it) has my desktop icons and

> > an

> > extra toolbar that I use. It's also oriented on the wrong side of what is

> > supposed to be my primary monitor. What's supposed to be the primary

> > monitor,

> > still has the taskbar on it for some reason.

> >

> > It's pretty annoying to have to reset all this every time I restart. Is

> > there some registry value I can set or clear to fix this?


>

>

> .

>
 
Oh, and I don't believe I've ever updated the display drivers from MS but I'm

not 100% positive.



"DL" wrote:



> And what are you using to provide multi monitor support, the software

> supplied with your graphics card or win multi monitor?

> Have you installed any driver updates from MSUpdate?

>

> "xr280xr" wrote in message

> news:426153BE-6C5F-4412-9462-681ABB6F4B99@microsoft.com...

> > Hi,

> > I have dual displays at my computer and it has recently started

> > "forgetting"

> > the display settings after I restart. Upon restarting once, only one

> > monitor

> > will come up with a signal and I can't get it to output to the other

> > monitor.

> > If I restart a second time, both monitors will have a signal but it has

> > the

> > wrong montior set up as the primary monitor. What is supposed to be my

> > second

> > monitor (the one w/ my desktop extended onto it) has my desktop icons and

> > an

> > extra toolbar that I use. It's also oriented on the wrong side of what is

> > supposed to be my primary monitor. What's supposed to be the primary

> > monitor,

> > still has the taskbar on it for some reason.

> >

> > It's pretty annoying to have to reset all this every time I restart. Is

> > there some registry value I can set or clear to fix this?


>

>

> .

>
 
After re-installing here is some more behavior that might narrow it down. I'm

pretty sure something is different about this Dell monitor. It acts like it's

not plug and play or not multi-display friendly or something.



I've been using my computer with only the Asus mointor pluged in to the

nvidia quadro card and it has worked fine. Quadro card has two DVI out puts.

I notice if I unplug the Asus monitor and plug it back in, I hear the XP plug

and play device found sound. I tried switching between the two DVI plugs and

it works fine on both.



Next I tried plugging in the Dell again. It doesn't play the plug and play

sound effect for this monitor and doesn't send it any signal. If I go to my

display settings, it only recognizes 1 monitor: (Default Monitor) on NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570. When checking the display settings in the nvidia control

panel, it shows a single monitor and actually shows the name: Asus VH236H.



Here's the stranger part. If I go to Device Manager>Monitors>Scan for

hardware changes, then the sound plays and Dell E1909W(Digital) shows up in

the list of monitors. When I return to the windows display settings tab, it

still only recognizes the 1 monitor. Strangely, when checking the nvidia

control panel settings, it now shows only Dell E1909W and no longer sees the

Asus monitor. What seems like the biggest clue in all of this is, if at this

point I unplug the Dell monitor, the plug and play noise plays as if it just

found the Asus monitor again even though it was already plugged in. Once I

crawl back out from under my desk (which is getting really fun ;) Asus VH236H

now appears in the still open nvidia control panel settings screen.



So it's like the Dell monitor is not plug and play, and once it's

recognized, it wants to be the only display. I need an expert! Thanks.
 
xr280xr wrote:

> After re-installing here is some more behavior that might narrow it down. I'm

> pretty sure something is different about this Dell monitor. It acts like it's

> not plug and play or not multi-display friendly or something.

>

> I've been using my computer with only the Asus mointor pluged in to the

> nvidia quadro card and it has worked fine. Quadro card has two DVI out puts.

> I notice if I unplug the Asus monitor and plug it back in, I hear the XP plug

> and play device found sound. I tried switching between the two DVI plugs and

> it works fine on both.

>

> Next I tried plugging in the Dell again. It doesn't play the plug and play

> sound effect for this monitor and doesn't send it any signal. If I go to my

> display settings, it only recognizes 1 monitor: (Default Monitor) on NVIDIA

> Quadro FX 570. When checking the display settings in the nvidia control

> panel, it shows a single monitor and actually shows the name: Asus VH236H.

>

> Here's the stranger part. If I go to Device Manager>Monitors>Scan for

> hardware changes, then the sound plays and Dell E1909W(Digital) shows up in

> the list of monitors. When I return to the windows display settings tab, it

> still only recognizes the 1 monitor. Strangely, when checking the nvidia

> control panel settings, it now shows only Dell E1909W and no longer sees the

> Asus monitor. What seems like the biggest clue in all of this is, if at this

> point I unplug the Dell monitor, the plug and play noise plays as if it just

> found the Asus monitor again even though it was already plugged in. Once I

> crawl back out from under my desk (which is getting really fun ;) Asus VH236H

> now appears in the still open nvidia control panel settings screen.

>

> So it's like the Dell monitor is not plug and play, and once it's

> recognized, it wants to be the only display. I need an expert! Thanks.

>




You can review the Plug and Play coming from the monitors with this.

If you can see the two monitors in the pull-down menu, and both

displays gobs of numbers, then chances are both monitors are doing

their jobs. If one display shows and the other does not, there could

be some kind of conflict (or bad implementation) on the video card.



http://www.entechtaiwan.com/util/moninfo.shtm



Page 8 here, shows a hardware block diagram. You have to be very patient,

as when you use Adobe Acrobat Reader to view page 8, it can take many

seconds before the diagram appears (on my slow computers, I have to wait

30 seconds before the diagram appears). So flip to page 8 and wait until

a yellow colored block diagram appears in the middle of the page.



http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonx1k/whitepapers/X1000_Family_Technology_Overview_Whitepaper.pdf



The concept there, is there are logically two display channels on the

video card. A display channel is "bound" to a monitor at some point.

A video card may have three connectors on the faceplate, but only

two of them can be driven at any one time, as there are only

two logical display channels in a multi-head capable desktop video card.

(Cards capable of driving four monitors, are cheating, as they use

two GPU chips, and really, it is the same ratio of two display channels

available per GPU chip.)



Now, consider your scenario. You have two monitors. Only one of them

seems to "bind" to anything, and the monitor that wins seems to be

random.



Imagine, for some reason, that only one logical display channel was working.

This could be a driver issue (such as the driver not installing properly),

or some other kind of interference, such as running in SLI mode.

Would the second card also be an FX 570 ? Did the Nvidia driver

assume they're operating SLI, and do some kind of bus-based

SLI combining of the two cards performance ? Perhaps that

results in one logical display channel, and only the ability

to drive one monitor. (Two cards in SLI, as far as I know,

are still limited to driving one display. Maybe that has changed

recently, but I don't have an easy way to check that.)



Now, on my computer, I've got it easy. In Device Manager, each

display channel of my video card, has its own entry. In other

words, I have one video card installed, but there are two

entries in Device Manager. I can tell by looking at that, that

logically all is well.



It seems for more recent video cards (mine is ancient), that

has changed. They no longer necessarily put multiple entries

in Device Manager. I was hoping to use that as a debugging tool,

but looking at pictures of Device Manager on the web, they

don't seem to use that concept any more. Now, they seem to

put only one entry per video card. That leaves me with

no simple way to verify both logical display channels are available.



Paul
 
Wow, that's some excellent information Paul, thank you. I will try out the

Monitor Asset Manager after I restart. I currently have all 3 displays

working but I'm guessing it might get messed up again after I restart. There

does seem to be a binding issue but to me it seems like the Dell always wins

when it's plugged in. Based on that, I figured, I should just plug the Dell

into the second video card and stop trying to battle between it and another

monitor (Fuji Plus a.k.a. Kingston). So with the Asus and a 3rd monitor

plugged into the FX 570 and the Dell plugged into the disabled second card,

which is a PCI GForce 6200, I started to try to get dual monitors to work. I

could not get it to work using windows but using the nvidia control panel, I

could choose from Clone, or Span across the monitors. "Dual View" was not

available. I've seen this before in the past too and usually restarting it

magically causes Dual View to become available and it did this time too. I

now had dual displays working correctly. I restarted again to make sure it

would stick and the secondary monitor initialized first during startup, but

then they displayed correctly once Windows (and probably the nvidia driver)

was loaded. I enabled the GForce 6200, restarted and configured the Dell as

my 3rd display and so far so good. So it seems like with the Asus + Kingston,

the FX 570 is finnicky but predictable but with the Asus + Dell, it's

completely uncontrollable.



In reference to the rest of your post, it does seem like one of the channels

gets deactivated somehow and I have to perform the right steps, such as

restarting after it recognizes 2 monitors are being used, to get it to use

it. I was not aware of SLI technology until you mentioned it but that does

sound like a good theory though I'm guessing since my second card is just a

PCI card, it might not even be possible. I don't even have the SLI settings

under 3D settings in the NVidia control panel so hopefully that is not

happening! FYI, according to the nvidia control panel help, you can actually

set up SLI with multiple monitors too now.



My device manager used to show the fx570 as two devices too but now it just

shows one. I don't know when or why that changed. It sounds like I probably

need to get in contact with nvidia or Dell support for this as it's most

likely an issue with the way the video card is being driven?



Thanks for your help.







> You can review the Plug and Play coming from the monitors with this.

> If you can see the two monitors in the pull-down menu, and both

> displays gobs of numbers, then chances are both monitors are doing

> their jobs. If one display shows and the other does not, there could

> be some kind of conflict (or bad implementation) on the video card.

>

> http://www.entechtaiwan.com/util/moninfo.shtm

>

> Page 8 here, shows a hardware block diagram. You have to be very patient,

> as when you use Adobe Acrobat Reader to view page 8, it can take many

> seconds before the diagram appears (on my slow computers, I have to wait

> 30 seconds before the diagram appears). So flip to page 8 and wait until

> a yellow colored block diagram appears in the middle of the page.

>

> http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonx1k/whitepapers/X1000_Family_Technology_Overview_Whitepaper.pdf

>

> The concept there, is there are logically two display channels on the

> video card. A display channel is "bound" to a monitor at some point.

> A video card may have three connectors on the faceplate, but only

> two of them can be driven at any one time, as there are only

> two logical display channels in a multi-head capable desktop video card.

> (Cards capable of driving four monitors, are cheating, as they use

> two GPU chips, and really, it is the same ratio of two display channels

> available per GPU chip.)

>

> Now, consider your scenario. You have two monitors. Only one of them

> seems to "bind" to anything, and the monitor that wins seems to be

> random.

>

> Imagine, for some reason, that only one logical display channel was working.

> This could be a driver issue (such as the driver not installing properly),

> or some other kind of interference, such as running in SLI mode.

> Would the second card also be an FX 570 ? Did the Nvidia driver

> assume they're operating SLI, and do some kind of bus-based

> SLI combining of the two cards performance ? Perhaps that

> results in one logical display channel, and only the ability

> to drive one monitor. (Two cards in SLI, as far as I know,

> are still limited to driving one display. Maybe that has changed

> recently, but I don't have an easy way to check that.)

>

> Now, on my computer, I've got it easy. In Device Manager, each

> display channel of my video card, has its own entry. In other

> words, I have one video card installed, but there are two

> entries in Device Manager. I can tell by looking at that, that

> logically all is well.

>

> It seems for more recent video cards (mine is ancient), that

> has changed. They no longer necessarily put multiple entries

> in Device Manager. I was hoping to use that as a debugging tool,

> but looking at pictures of Device Manager on the web, they

> don't seem to use that concept any more. Now, they seem to

> put only one entry per video card. That leaves me with

> no simple way to verify both logical display channels are available.

>

> Paul

> .

>
 
Well it's been a couple weeks and I've restarted a couple times and the

monitors have come up correctly both times now that I have the Dell monitor

plugged into the 2nd video card by itself. So I think that it is something

about that was messing up the way my other video card initialized. I wish I

knew what it was. One strange quirck I still have is when restarting, the

POST screen and Windows XP loading screen always initialize on my secondary

monitor no matter which physical output I use on the back. Once windows is

loaded they get sorted out though so not a problem.



"xr280xr" wrote:



> Wow, that's some excellent information Paul, thank you. I will try out the

> Monitor Asset Manager after I restart. I currently have all 3 displays

> working but I'm guessing it might get messed up again after I restart. There

> does seem to be a binding issue but to me it seems like the Dell always wins

> when it's plugged in. Based on that, I figured, I should just plug the Dell

> into the second video card and stop trying to battle between it and another

> monitor (Fuji Plus a.k.a. Kingston). So with the Asus and a 3rd monitor

> plugged into the FX 570 and the Dell plugged into the disabled second card,

> which is a PCI GForce 6200, I started to try to get dual monitors to work. I

> could not get it to work using windows but using the nvidia control panel, I

> could choose from Clone, or Span across the monitors. "Dual View" was not

> available. I've seen this before in the past too and usually restarting it

> magically causes Dual View to become available and it did this time too. I

> now had dual displays working correctly. I restarted again to make sure it

> would stick and the secondary monitor initialized first during startup, but

> then they displayed correctly once Windows (and probably the nvidia driver)

> was loaded. I enabled the GForce 6200, restarted and configured the Dell as

> my 3rd display and so far so good. So it seems like with the Asus + Kingston,

> the FX 570 is finnicky but predictable but with the Asus + Dell, it's

> completely uncontrollable.

>

> In reference to the rest of your post, it does seem like one of the channels

> gets deactivated somehow and I have to perform the right steps, such as

> restarting after it recognizes 2 monitors are being used, to get it to use

> it. I was not aware of SLI technology until you mentioned it but that does

> sound like a good theory though I'm guessing since my second card is just a

> PCI card, it might not even be possible. I don't even have the SLI settings

> under 3D settings in the NVidia control panel so hopefully that is not

> happening! FYI, according to the nvidia control panel help, you can actually

> set up SLI with multiple monitors too now.

>

> My device manager used to show the fx570 as two devices too but now it just

> shows one. I don't know when or why that changed. It sounds like I probably

> need to get in contact with nvidia or Dell support for this as it's most

> likely an issue with the way the video card is being driven?

>

> Thanks for your help.

>

>

>

> > You can review the Plug and Play coming from the monitors with this.

> > If you can see the two monitors in the pull-down menu, and both

> > displays gobs of numbers, then chances are both monitors are doing

> > their jobs. If one display shows and the other does not, there could

> > be some kind of conflict (or bad implementation) on the video card.

> >

> > http://www.entechtaiwan.com/util/moninfo.shtm

> >

> > Page 8 here, shows a hardware block diagram. You have to be very patient,

> > as when you use Adobe Acrobat Reader to view page 8, it can take many

> > seconds before the diagram appears (on my slow computers, I have to wait

> > 30 seconds before the diagram appears). So flip to page 8 and wait until

> > a yellow colored block diagram appears in the middle of the page.

> >

> > http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonx1k/whitepapers/X1000_Family_Technology_Overview_Whitepaper.pdf

> >

> > The concept there, is there are logically two display channels on the

> > video card. A display channel is "bound" to a monitor at some point.

> > A video card may have three connectors on the faceplate, but only

> > two of them can be driven at any one time, as there are only

> > two logical display channels in a multi-head capable desktop video card.

> > (Cards capable of driving four monitors, are cheating, as they use

> > two GPU chips, and really, it is the same ratio of two display channels

> > available per GPU chip.)

> >

> > Now, consider your scenario. You have two monitors. Only one of them

> > seems to "bind" to anything, and the monitor that wins seems to be

> > random.

> >

> > Imagine, for some reason, that only one logical display channel was working.

> > This could be a driver issue (such as the driver not installing properly),

> > or some other kind of interference, such as running in SLI mode.

> > Would the second card also be an FX 570 ? Did the Nvidia driver

> > assume they're operating SLI, and do some kind of bus-based

> > SLI combining of the two cards performance ? Perhaps that

> > results in one logical display channel, and only the ability

> > to drive one monitor. (Two cards in SLI, as far as I know,

> > are still limited to driving one display. Maybe that has changed

> > recently, but I don't have an easy way to check that.)

> >

> > Now, on my computer, I've got it easy. In Device Manager, each

> > display channel of my video card, has its own entry. In other

> > words, I have one video card installed, but there are two

> > entries in Device Manager. I can tell by looking at that, that

> > logically all is well.

> >

> > It seems for more recent video cards (mine is ancient), that

> > has changed. They no longer necessarily put multiple entries

> > in Device Manager. I was hoping to use that as a debugging tool,

> > but looking at pictures of Device Manager on the web, they

> > don't seem to use that concept any more. Now, they seem to

> > put only one entry per video card. That leaves me with

> > no simple way to verify both logical display channels are available.

> >

> > Paul

> > .

> >
 
Back
Top