Sharing folders: Why would I want to? Why does it reset?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigBang
  • Start date Start date
B

BigBang

Guest
When I right click a secondary hard drive, then go to Properties, Sharing

I can elect to not "Do not share this folder". But it says it will reset

when the computer is restarted. Huh? Does this make sense to anybody?

Why would anybody not elect to disable sharing if not in a network. Isn't

this basic security?
 
One or more options/settings in an ever-growing number of third-party

applications may be disallowing the changes from "sticking." These include

anti-spyware applications (e.g., Ad-aware's Ad-Watch, Spybot Tea Timer,

SpywareBlaster, SpySweeper, Spyware Doctor, CounterSpy, WinPatrol, etc),

anti-virus applications & security suites (Norton, McAfee, ESET/NOD32,

Kasperky, Trend Micro, etc.), and third-party firewalls (e.g., Zone Alarm,

etc.).



Note that temporarily disabling the application(s) or rebooting into Safe

Mode may not disable the application's system protections.



BigBang wrote:

> When I right click a secondary hard drive, then go to Properties, Sharing

> I can elect to not "Do not share this folder". But it says it will reset

> when the computer is restarted. Huh? Does this make sense to anybody?

> Why would anybody not elect to disable sharing if not in a network. Isn't

> this basic security?
 
So is it preferred for a single user to have "Do not share folder" checked

all the time?



> One or more options/settings in an ever-growing number of third-party

> applications may be disallowing the changes from "sticking." These

> include anti-spyware applications (e.g., Ad-aware's Ad-Watch, Spybot Tea

> Timer, SpywareBlaster, SpySweeper, Spyware Doctor, CounterSpy,

> WinPatrol, etc), anti-virus applications & security suites (Norton,

> McAfee, ESET/NOD32, Kasperky, Trend Micro, etc.), and third-party

> firewalls (e.g., Zone Alarm, etc.).

>

> Note that temporarily disabling the application(s) or rebooting into

> Safe Mode may not disable the application's system protections.

>

> BigBang wrote:

>> When I right click a secondary hard drive, then go to Properties,

>> Sharing

>> I can elect to not "Do not share this folder". But it says it will

>> reset

>> when the computer is restarted. Huh? Does this make sense to anybody?

>> Why would anybody not elect to disable sharing if not in a network.

>> Isn't

>> this basic security?
 
Not necessarily, no.



What anti-virus application or security suite is installed and is your

subscription current? What anti-spyware applications (other than Defender)?

What third-party firewall (if any)?



Has a(another) Norton or McAfee application ever been installed on the

computer (e.g., a free-trial version that came preinstalled when you bought

it)?



BigBang wrote:

> So is it preferred for a single user to have "Do not share folder" checked

> all the time?

>

>> One or more options/settings in an ever-growing number of third-party

>> applications may be disallowing the changes from "sticking." These

>> include anti-spyware applications (e.g., Ad-aware's Ad-Watch, Spybot Tea

>> Timer, SpywareBlaster, SpySweeper, Spyware Doctor, CounterSpy,

>> WinPatrol, etc), anti-virus applications & security suites (Norton,

>> McAfee, ESET/NOD32, Kasperky, Trend Micro, etc.), and third-party

>> firewalls (e.g., Zone Alarm, etc.).

>>

>> Note that temporarily disabling the application(s) or rebooting into

>> Safe Mode may not disable the application's system protections.

>>

>> BigBang wrote:

>>> When I right click a secondary hard drive, then go to Properties,

>>> Sharing

>>> I can elect to not "Do not share this folder". But it says it will

>>> reset

>>> when the computer is restarted. Huh? Does this make sense to anybody?

>>> Why would anybody not elect to disable sharing if not in a network.

>>> Isn't

>>> this basic security?
 
What I should have asked was, why would anyone opt to share a drive if

you're a single user?



> Not necessarily, no.

>

> What anti-virus application or security suite is installed and is your

> subscription current? What anti-spyware applications (other than

> Defender)? What third-party firewall (if any)?

>

> Has a(another) Norton or McAfee application ever been installed on the

> computer (e.g., a free-trial version that came preinstalled when you

> bought it)?

>

> BigBang wrote:

>> So is it preferred for a single user to have "Do not share folder"

>> checked

>> all the time?

>>

>>> One or more options/settings in an ever-growing number of third-party

>>> applications may be disallowing the changes from "sticking." These

>>> include anti-spyware applications (e.g., Ad-aware's Ad-Watch, Spybot

>>> Tea

>>> Timer, SpywareBlaster, SpySweeper, Spyware Doctor, CounterSpy,

>>> WinPatrol, etc), anti-virus applications & security suites (Norton,

>>> McAfee, ESET/NOD32, Kasperky, Trend Micro, etc.), and third-party

>>> firewalls (e.g., Zone Alarm, etc.).

>>>

>>> Note that temporarily disabling the application(s) or rebooting into

>>> Safe Mode may not disable the application's system protections.

>>>

>>> BigBang wrote:

>>>> When I right click a secondary hard drive, then go to Properties,

>>>> Sharing

>>>> I can elect to not "Do not share this folder". But it says it will

>>>> reset

>>>> when the computer is restarted. Huh? Does this make sense to

>>>> anybody?

>>>> Why would anybody not elect to disable sharing if not in a network.

>>>> Isn't

>>>> this basic security?
 
BigBang wrote:

> What I should have asked was, why would anyone opt to share a drive if

> you're a single user?

>



I can give you an example. Run Linux inside a VPC2007 (Virtual PC) session

on your WinXP PC. In the Linux window, go to the equivalent of the Network

Neighborhood via SAMBA/SMB and you can share files from a share on your

WinXP side of the machine. So it can be used for file sharing *within*

the PC. It allows me to run two OSes inside the same computer (WinXP and Linux),

and transfer files between them. (The reason for this complexity, is VPC2007

does not have the appropriate add-ons package, to make all Linux environments

work with drag and drop. If the guest OS is a Windows OS, then drag and drop

works for those, and using "sharing" is unnecessary.)



Paul
 
>> What I should have asked was, why would anyone opt to share a drive if

>> you're a single user?

>

> I can give you an example. Run Linux inside a VPC2007 (Virtual PC)

> session

> on your WinXP PC. In the Linux window, go to the equivalent of the

> Network

> Neighborhood via SAMBA/SMB and you can share files from a share on your

> WinXP side of the machine. So it can be used for file sharing *within*

> the PC. It allows me to run two OSes inside the same computer (WinXP and

> Linux),

> and transfer files between them. (The reason for this complexity, is

> VPC2007

> does not have the appropriate add-ons package, to make all Linux

> environments

> work with drag and drop. If the guest OS is a Windows OS, then drag and

> drop

> works for those, and using "sharing" is unnecessary.)



Good example. But shouldn't the default be not to share since 99% of the

population only runs 1 OS?
 
BigBang wrote:

>>> What I should have asked was, why would anyone opt to share a drive

>>> if you're a single user?

>>

>> I can give you an example. Run Linux inside a VPC2007 (Virtual PC)

>> session

>> on your WinXP PC. In the Linux window, go to the equivalent of the

>> Network

>> Neighborhood via SAMBA/SMB and you can share files from a share on your

>> WinXP side of the machine. So it can be used for file sharing *within*

>> the PC. It allows me to run two OSes inside the same computer (WinXP

>> and Linux),

>> and transfer files between them. (The reason for this complexity, is

>> VPC2007

>> does not have the appropriate add-ons package, to make all Linux

>> environments

>> work with drag and drop. If the guest OS is a Windows OS, then drag

>> and drop

>> works for those, and using "sharing" is unnecessary.)

>

> Good example. But shouldn't the default be not to share since 99% of

> the population only runs 1 OS?



I had to turn it on, to get it to work here. The default

seemed to be OFF when I set this up very recently. I didn't leave it

enabled, either. It is off again.



Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Why can I not access shared devices/folders after installing KB5046732, and still after installing KB5046740?
Replies
0
Views
2
John Veale1
J
S
Sharing files between accounts does not work
Replies
0
Views
9
Sienna ODonnell
S
G
Sharing public folders automatically shares ALL
Replies
0
Views
10
GuiltySpark343
G
B
the pop up to log in sharing folder doesn't appear? how do I make it appear again?
Replies
0
Views
6
badrexz
B
B
Why does it say my account does not exist
Replies
0
Views
6
bryson leon
B
Back
Top