Norton 360 problem with XP. It may be a virus/Trojan

  • Thread starter Thread starter JeanPaulo
  • Start date Start date
J

JeanPaulo

Guest
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



It is now some kind of a vengeance thing.



Weirdly, I set an Explorer page to the directory, and the 'bad file'

is NOT there at all.



So, when and where this Lightningsand.cfd file is created ?



Beside it, all is fine. So, Norton, or XP, or a not detected virus ?



Malware bytes did not detect anything suspect (3 dormant virus files,

never executed, and a Hosts file in /windows (but looks like text only

to me)



Thanks



>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:04:35 +0100, JeanPaulo

>> wrote:

>>

>>> I have a weird problem with XP and Norton 360. Of course Norton

>>> denies anything to do with it !

>>>


>> After dallying a lot, I am now thinking 'Virus/Trojan'.

>>

>> After a reboot (not every time, but twice a week), I got the message :

>>

>> \Documents and Settings\All Users\Application

>> Data\Norton\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\Norton\SRTSP\LightningSand.CFD

>> is corrupted, please run chkdsk...

>>

>> As it is a Norton directory, I suspected Norton, but they have been

>> helpless....

>>

>> Then, I do remark :

>> Norton, Spybot, Adaware do not detect anything wrong.

>>

>> Hijackthis do not show anything obvious.

>>

>> After the chkdsk, the file is GONE. But Norton does not care ...

>>

>> (before the chkdsk, the file is not accessible because of the

>> disk/pointer/directory error)

>>

>> There are several postes about this file as a virus 'clue', but

>> nothing really conclusive.

>>

>> Anyway, the answer to my submission by Seagate was 'Replace the disk'.

>>

>> I did this, change the system disk and rebuild my whole XP pro

>> install, and

>>

>> I stil have the problem here.... (100 € and 1 week of work lost)


>

>Have you reached the conclusion that it is time to cut your losses (100

>€ and 1 week of work lost) yet?

>

>Or do you plan on spending more time or money on this particular

>problem?

>

>If you choose to pursue this further (not my recommendation!), you need

>to post to a Norton users forum.

>

>If you had unlimited time to troubleshoot, one thing you could do is

>create an image of your drive and then uninstall Norton and then run

>their Removal Tool. Chances are your problem will be gone. Then you

>could decide if it is worth your while to keep Norton. If you are really

>committed to Norton 360, you would then restore the image and spend more

>time troubleshooting and trying to solve the problem. You have already

>ruled out a physically bad hard drive. Perhaps another Norton user can

>help you solve your particular problem.

>

>But IMO, it is logical to cut your losses. I wouldn't keep Norton 360;

>there are far too many reports of unsatisfied users to justify sticking

>with this problematic suite. The following combination (all free

>programs) would be an excellent substitution:

>

>1. Windows Firewall (part of Windows XP)

>

>2. Avira Antivir (antivirus)

>

>3. MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware and SUPERAntiSpyware (otherantimalware

>programs)

>
 
Inline.



JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

> It is now some kind of a vengeance thing.






Yeah, I got that impression!





> Weirdly, I set an Explorer page to the directory, and the 'bad file'

> is NOT there at all.

>

> So, when and where this Lightningsand.cfd file is created ?






Ask other Norton users is the only advice I can offer.





> Beside it, all is fine. So, Norton, or XP, or a not detected virus ?

>

> Malware bytes did not detect anything suspect (3 dormant virus files,

> never executed, and a Hosts file in /windows (but looks like text only

> to me)






Here is the proper location for the hosts file:



C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc



Is this what you are referring to?



How large is your hosts file and what was the date it was last modified?



FWIW, I use the hosts file from here:



http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm



The last time I updated it was December 10. Both MBAM and Avira come up

negative when they scan it. Interestingly, back in December, Avira wound

up detecting a false positive in it! The name of the supposed infection:



HTML/Rce.Gen HTML script virus





> Thanks

>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:04:35 +0100, JeanPaulo

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> I have a weird problem with XP and Norton 360. Of course Norton

>>>> denies anything to do with it !

>>>>

>>> After dallying a lot, I am now thinking 'Virus/Trojan'.

>>>

>>> After a reboot (not every time, but twice a week), I got the

>>> message :

>>>

>>> \Documents and Settings\All Users\Application

>>> Data\Norton\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\Norton\SRTSP\LightningSand.CFD

>>> is corrupted, please run chkdsk...

>>>

>>> As it is a Norton directory, I suspected Norton, but they have been

>>> helpless....

>>>

>>> Then, I do remark :

>>> Norton, Spybot, Adaware do not detect anything wrong.

>>>

>>> Hijackthis do not show anything obvious.

>>>

>>> After the chkdsk, the file is GONE. But Norton does not care ...

>>>

>>> (before the chkdsk, the file is not accessible because of the

>>> disk/pointer/directory error)

>>>

>>> There are several postes about this file as a virus 'clue', but

>>> nothing really conclusive.

>>>

>>> Anyway, the answer to my submission by Seagate was 'Replace the

>>> disk'.

>>>

>>> I did this, change the system disk and rebuild my whole XP pro

>>> install, and

>>>

>>> I stil have the problem here.... (100 ? and 1 week of work lost)


>>

>> Have you reached the conclusion that it is time to cut your losses

>> (100 ? and 1 week of work lost) yet?

>>

>> Or do you plan on spending more time or money on this particular

>> problem?

>>

>> If you choose to pursue this further (not my recommendation!), you

>> need to post to a Norton users forum.

>>

>> If you had unlimited time to troubleshoot, one thing you could do is

>> create an image of your drive and then uninstall Norton and then run

>> their Removal Tool. Chances are your problem will be gone. Then you

>> could decide if it is worth your while to keep Norton. If you are

>> really committed to Norton 360, you would then restore the image and

>> spend more time troubleshooting and trying to solve the problem. You

>> have already ruled out a physically bad hard drive. Perhaps another

>> Norton user can help you solve your particular problem.

>>

>> But IMO, it is logical to cut your losses. I wouldn't keep Norton

>> 360; there are far too many reports of unsatisfied users to justify

>> sticking with this problematic suite. The following combination (all

>> free programs) would be an excellent substitution:

>>

>> 1. Windows Firewall (part of Windows XP)

>>

>> 2. Avira Antivir (antivirus)

>>

>> 3. MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware and SUPERAntiSpyware (otherantimalware

>> programs)
 
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>Inline.

>

>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>




>> Weirdly, I set an Explorer page to the directory, and the 'bad file'

>> is NOT there at all.

>>

>> So, when and where this Lightningsand.cfd file is created ?


>

>

>Ask other Norton users is the only advice I can offer.

>


I am not sure at all that it IS a norton file.



I had a directory showing there all day yesterday. It never showed

that damned file.

However, this morning an auto chkdsk showed this file as damaged

(between shutdown and reboot !!!)



I am getting mad!

>




>

>

>Here is the proper location for the hosts file:

>

>C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc

>

>Is this what you are referring to?


I know. I have a file there, containing MY false addresses, and I do

have a program checking every days that is was NOT modified



However, the detected HOSTS file was in /windows, and was 36 K

mine is 34 K

>

>How large is your hosts file and what was the date it was last modified?

>

>FWIW, I use the hosts file from here:

>

>http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

>

>The last time I updated it was December 10. Both MBAM and Avira come up

>negative when they scan it. Interestingly, back in December, Avira wound

>up detecting a false positive in it! The name of the supposed infection:

>

>HTML/Rce.Gen HTML script virus

>

>


here is the Malware line :

E:\WINDOWS\hosts (Trojan.Agent) -> Not selected for removal.

(I wanted to have a look at it first)

>> Thanks
 
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>Inline.

>

>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> But IMO, it is logical to cut your losses. I wouldn't keep Norton

>>> 360; there are far too many reports of unsatisfied users to justify

>>> sticking with this problematic suite. The following combination (all

>>> free programs) would be an excellent substitution:

>>>

>>> 1. Windows Firewall (part of Windows XP)

>>>

>>> 2. Avira Antivir (antivirus)

>>>

>>> 3. MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware and SUPERAntiSpyware (otherantimalware

>>> programs)


>


Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

Allright, now,

I am waiting to see what happens...
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>> Inline.

>>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500, "Daave"

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> But IMO, it is logical to cut your losses. I wouldn't keep Norton

>>>> 360; there are far too many reports of unsatisfied users to justify

>>>> sticking with this problematic suite. The following combination

>>>> (all free programs) would be an excellent substitution:

>>>>

>>>> 1. Windows Firewall (part of Windows XP)

>>>>

>>>> 2. Avira Antivir (antivirus)

>>>>

>>>> 3. MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware and SUPERAntiSpyware

>>>> (otherantimalware programs)


>>


> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

> Allright, now,

> I am waiting to see what happens...




I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think you

did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And happy

computing!
 
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:09 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> Inline.




>>>


>> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

>> Allright, now,

>> I am waiting to see what happens...


>

>I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think you

>did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And happy

>computing!

>




Too bad. I just had the same problem again, with a 'Avguard.tmp' file

corrupted (always this index $I30 ??) although I am not certain that

there was not a system freeze (unknown reason) before shutdown.



I am waiting for more facts. But I guess Norton was not really bad!
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:09 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave"

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Inline.


>

>>>>

>>> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

>>> Allright, now,

>>> I am waiting to see what happens...


>>

>> I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think you

>> did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And happy

>> computing!

>>


>

> Too bad. I just had the same problem again, with a 'Avguard.tmp' file

> corrupted (always this index $I30 ??) although I am not certain that

> there was not a system freeze (unknown reason) before shutdown.




What exactly is the problem again? One of the problems with a thread

this long is that it is easy to lose track of pertinent events. In your

first post, you stated:



> Second, every 5 or so reboot, I get weird 'Disk Errors'




Is this your problem still? It would be helpful to give us the complete

message and anything else that you deem pertinent.



You did run the Norton removal tool, correct?



Also, check the Event Viewer for errors.



One thing you can try is running Ccleaner and then reboot.



Also, these pages may have useful info:



http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899



http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685



> I am waiting for more facts.




Facts would be helpful, yes!



> But I guess Norton was not really bad!




You *could* always reinstall it. But since so many users have reported

issues with Norton 360, I couldn't recommend doing this. Your call, of

course. (I am aware that the *newest* version of Norton has received

better reviews with regard to performance issues and conflicts.)



If this problem never goes away, you might want to consider a Clean

Install. Although it's time-consuming, sometimes it is the best course

of action.
 
Ok, le'st try just the main facts.



This IS a clean install. I changed my system disk (and bought a new

one) because I had the problem, and Seagate told me that my disk was

failling!



I did last a total remove of Norton 360 (including Symantec and Norton

remaining directories)



So the story is that since November, I keep getting those disk errors,

almost always at the same place, but on a different unit, a new

system, and Avira instead of Norton.



Five different AV did not find any 'working' bug (Avira found one a

bit doubtful in a rarely used program)



I cannot get the exact error message in chkdsk (Where is the log ?),

and it always says that Index $I30 is corrupt (I am doubting that this

is usefull information, though, without more data)



The problem ALWAYS occurs after shutdown, and the file seems to be

always 'temporary' or 'logging' type (Like Avguard.tmp last time)



I am not even considering going back to Norton yet (It is working fine

on a Notebook, a bit slow and too 'user do not need to know' for my

taste.



I have yet to try Cccleaner (and a bit afraid to do it!)



Thanks for the help.



On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:58:30 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:09 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave"

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Inline.


>>

>>>>>

>>>> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

>>>> Allright, now,

>>>> I am waiting to see what happens...

>>>

>>> I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think you

>>> did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And happy

>>> computing!

>>>


>>

>> Too bad. I just had the same problem again, with a 'Avguard.tmp' file

>> corrupted (always this index $I30 ??) although I am not certain that

>> there was not a system freeze (unknown reason) before shutdown.


>

>What exactly is the problem again? One of the problems with a thread

>this long is that it is easy to lose track of pertinent events. In your

>first post, you stated:

>

>> Second, every 5 or so reboot, I get weird 'Disk Errors'


>

>Is this your problem still? It would be helpful to give us the complete

>message and anything else that you deem pertinent.

>

>You did run the Norton removal tool, correct?

>

>Also, check the Event Viewer for errors.

>

>One thing you can try is running Ccleaner and then reboot.

>

>Also, these pages may have useful info:

>

>http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899

>

>http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685

>

>> I am waiting for more facts.


>

>Facts would be helpful, yes!

>

>> But I guess Norton was not really bad!


>

>You *could* always reinstall it. But since so many users have reported

>issues with Norton 360, I couldn't recommend doing this. Your call, of

>course. (I am aware that the *newest* version of Norton has received

>better reviews with regard to performance issues and conflicts.)

>

>If this problem never goes away, you might want to consider a Clean

>Install. Although it's time-consuming, sometimes it is the best course

>of action.

>
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> Ok, le'st try just the main facts.

>

> This IS a clean install. I changed my system disk (and bought a new

> one) because I had the problem, and Seagate told me that my disk was

> failling!




It may not be clean enough. :-) The reason: You had installed Norton on

it afterwards.



> I did last a total remove of Norton 360 (including Symantec and Norton

> remaining directories)




The term "total remove" is unclear. What exactly did you do?



> So the story is that since November, I keep getting those disk errors,

> almost always at the same place, but on a different unit, a new

> system, and Avira instead of Norton.




We need to know what the errors are. You need to include the complete

text and all other pertinent information (like when do they occur -- for

instance, after a particular action on your part).



> Five different AV did not find any 'working' bug (Avira found one a

> bit doubtful in a rarely used program)




What did it find?



> I cannot get the exact error message in chkdsk (Where is the log ?),

> and it always says that Index $I30 is corrupt (I am doubting that this

> is usefull information, though, without more data)




Chkdsk log:



http://www.cpucare.com/how-to-faqs/OS/XP/Viewing ChkDSk Results.htm



And while you are in Event Viewer, search for other errors (sort by

Type). You may click on the Copy button on the right and paste that

information into a future post. It will look like this:



Event Type: Information

Event Source: Winlogon

Event Category: None

Event ID: 1002

Date: 8/13/2009

Time: 11:11:55 AM

User: N/A

Computer: DAVETOM-II

Description:

The shell stopped unexpectedly and Explorer.exe was restarted.



For more information, see Help and Support Center at

http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.



> The problem ALWAYS occurs after shutdown, and the file seems to be

> always 'temporary' or 'logging' type (Like Avguard.tmp last time)




Describe what happens in detail, making sure you include the complete

text of any messages you see.



> I am not even considering going back to Norton yet (It is working fine

> on a Notebook, a bit slow and too 'user do not need to know' for my

> taste.

>

> I have yet to try Cccleaner (and a bit afraid to do it!)




No need to be afraid of Cleaner as long as you avoid its Registry

section. All it does is provide an effective way to delete temp files.

If you don't want to use Cleaner, then you need to do the following:



Start | All Programs | Accessories | System Tools | Disk Cleanup



The only boxes you need checked are:



Temporary Internet Files

Temp Files



(But I prefer the simplicity of Ccleanner. YMMV.)



Final thought: It is unlikely, but there is a very slight possibility

that *both* hard drives are bad. If you perform a Clean Install (and I

do mean Clean), the errors should go away. If not, I'd have to say the

new drive is also bad. Info on performing a Clean Install:



http://michaelstevenstech.com/cleanxpinstall.html



> Thanks for the help.




YW.





> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:58:30 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:09 -0500, "Daave"

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave"

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Inline.

>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

>>>>> Allright, now,

>>>>> I am waiting to see what happens...

>>>>

>>>> I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think

>>>> you did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And

>>>> happy computing!

>>>>

>>>

>>> Too bad. I just had the same problem again, with a 'Avguard.tmp'

>>> file corrupted (always this index $I30 ??) although I am not

>>> certain that there was not a system freeze (unknown reason) before

>>> shutdown.


>>

>> What exactly is the problem again? One of the problems with a thread

>> this long is that it is easy to lose track of pertinent events. In

>> your first post, you stated:

>>

>>> Second, every 5 or so reboot, I get weird 'Disk Errors'


>>

>> Is this your problem still? It would be helpful to give us the

>> complete message and anything else that you deem pertinent.

>>

>> You did run the Norton removal tool, correct?

>>

>> Also, check the Event Viewer for errors.

>>

>> One thing you can try is running Ccleaner and then reboot.

>>

>> Also, these pages may have useful info:

>>

>> http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899

>>

>> http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685

>>

>>> I am waiting for more facts.


>>

>> Facts would be helpful, yes!

>>

>>> But I guess Norton was not really bad!


>>

>> You *could* always reinstall it. But since so many users have

>> reported issues with Norton 360, I couldn't recommend doing this.

>> Your call, of course. (I am aware that the *newest* version of

>> Norton has received better reviews with regard to performance issues

>> and conflicts.)

>>

>> If this problem never goes away, you might want to consider a Clean

>> Install. Although it's time-consuming, sometimes it is the best

>> course of action.
 
Daave wrote:

> JeanPaulo wrote:




>> I have yet to try Cccleaner (and a bit afraid to do it!)


>

> No need to be afraid of Cleaner as long as you avoid its Registry

> section. All it does is provide an effective way to delete temp files.

> If you don't want to use Cleaner, then you need to do the following:




Ccleaner is what I meant!



> Start | All Programs | Accessories | System Tools | Disk Cleanup

>

> The only boxes you need checked are:

>

> Temporary Internet Files

> Temp Files

>

> (But I prefer the simplicity of Ccleanner. YMMV.)
 
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:37:11 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>JeanPaulo wrote:




Sorry for this lenghty post !



>> Ok, le'st try just the main facts.

>>

>> This IS a clean install. I changed my system disk (and bought a new

>> one) because I had the problem, and Seagate told me that my disk was

>> failling!


>

>It may not be clean enough. :-) The reason: You had installed Norton on

>it afterwards.

>

>> I did last a total remove of Norton 360 (including Symantec and Norton

>> remaining directories)


>

>The term "total remove" is unclear. What exactly did you do?

>


I used the Norton remover tool, and then checked and deleted any

Symantec or Norton files.



I also used Ccleaner to check Registry last.



>> So the story is that since November, I keep getting those disk errors,

>> almost always at the same place, but on a different unit, a new

>> system, and Avira instead of Norton.


>

>We need to know what the errors are. You need to include the complete

>text and all other pertinent information (like when do they occur -- for

>instance, after a particular action on your part).

>


OK, now I see how to check the errors. There are plenty of entries...



>> Five different AV did not find any 'working' bug (Avira found one a

>> bit doubtful in a rarely used program)


>

>What did it find?


a tr_dropper.gen in two files which have been executed since the

re-install.



The others are totaly irrelevant (a Hosts file, and a dummy text

Love.eml giving the specific about the old 'love' virus)



Nothing in the 'system' area.

>

>> I cannot get the exact error message in chkdsk (Where is the log ?),

>> and it always says that Index $I30 is corrupt (I am doubting that this

>> is usefull information, though, without more data)


>

>Chkdsk log:

>

>http://www.cpucare.com/how-to-faqs/OS/XP/Viewing ChkDSk Results.htm

>

>And while you are in Event Viewer, search for other errors (sort by

>Type). You may click on the Copy button on the right and paste that

>information into a future post. It will look like this:

>

>Event Type: Information

>Event Source: Winlogon

>Event Category: None

>Event ID: 1002

>Date: 8/13/2009

>Time: 11:11:55 AM

>User: N/A

>Computer: DAVETOM-II

>Description:

>The shell stopped unexpectedly and Explorer.exe was restarted.

>

>For more information, see Help and Support Center at

>http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.

>


ok. Here is the entry

wuauclt (2412) Une tentative d'ouverture du fichier

"E:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\DataStore\Logs\tmp.edb" pour accès en

lecture/écriture a échoué en indiquant l'erreur système 1392

(0x00000570) : "Le fichier ou le répertoire est endommagé et

illisible. ". L'opération d'ouverture de fichier échouera en indiquant

l'erreur -1022 (0xfffffc02).



Pour plus d'informations, consultez le centre Aide et support à

l'adresse http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.



wuauclt (216) Impossible d'écrire un en-tête de sauvegarde pour le

fichier E:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\DataStore\Logs\tmp.edb. Erreur

-1022.



and here is the winlogon entry after the last problem (This MAY not be

the same problem, as I had a system lock and had to hard reboot the

system)



Vérification du système de fichiers sur E:

Le type du système de fichiers est NTFS.

Le nom de volume est SEA_W98_D.







L'intégrité de l'un de vos disques doit être vérifiée.

Vous pouvez annuler cette vérification, mais son exécution est

fortement recommandée.

Windows va maintenant vérifier le disque.

L'enregistrement d'attribut de type 0x80 et de balise d'instance 0x3 a

un lien croisé

qui commence à 0x44be3 pour 0x4 clusters éventuels.

L'enregistrement d'attribut de type 0x80 et de balise d'instance 0x3 a

un lien croisé

qui commence à 0x44be3 pour 0x4 clusters éventuels.

Certains clusters occupés par l'attribut de type 0x80 et de balise

d'instance 0x3

dans le fichier 0x3c5 sont déjà utilisés.

Suppression de l'enregistrement d'attribut endommagé (128, "")

du segment d'enregistrement de fichier 965.

La référence de fichier 0x11a0000000000bc de l'entrée d'index

LightningSand.CFD de l'index $I30

avec le parent 0x7e75 n'est pas la même que 0x1190000000000bc.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index LightningSand.CFD dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 32373.

La référence de fichier 0x11a0000000000bc de l'entrée d'index

LIGHTN~1.CFD de l'index $I30

avec le parent 0x7e75 n'est pas la même que 0x1190000000000bc.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index LIGHTN~1.CFD dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 32373.

Nettoyage en cours de petites incohérences sur le lecteur.

CHKDSK récupère les fichiers perdus.

Récupération du fichier orphelin SYMEFA1.DB (188) dans le fichier de

répertoire 30729.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060443.lnk (411) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060444.lnk (415) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060445.lnk (433) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060446.lnk (437) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060450.lnk (466) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060452.lnk (478) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060451.lnk (628) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060449.lnk (638) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060440.lnk (651) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A00604~1.MAN (966) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060478.manifest (966) dans le

fichier de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060479.dll (974) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060441.lnk (1047) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060442.lnk (1063) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin rp.log (1092) dans le fichier de

répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin snapshot (1096) dans le fichier de

répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin RESTOR~1 (2292) dans le fichier de

répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin RestorePointSize (2292) dans le

fichier de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060447.lnk (32118) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0060448.lnk (32174) dans le fichier

de répertoire 1058.

Nettoyage en cours de 18 entrées d'index inutilisées à partir de

l'index $SII du fichier 0x9.

Nettoyage en cours de 18 entrées d'index inutilisées à partir de

l'index $SDH du fichier 0x9.

Nettoyage en cours de 18 descripteurs de sécurité non utilisés.

Insertion d'un attribut de données dans le fichier 965.

CHKDSK vérifie le journal USN...

Vérification du journal USN terminée.

Correction des erreurs dans l'attribut BITMAP de la table de fichiers

maîtres (MFT).

Correction des erreurs dans le carte du volume.

Windows a effectué des corrections sur le système de fichiers.



41632415 Ko d'espace disque au total.

9738224 Ko dans 41691 fichiers.

13704 Ko dans 3719 index.

32 Ko dans des secteurs défectueux.

207771 Ko utilisés par le système.

65536 Ko occupés par le fichier journal.

31672684 Ko disponibles sur le disque.



4096 octets dans chaque unité d'allocation.

10408103 unités d'allocation au total sur le disque.

7918171 unités d'allocation disponibles sur le disque.



Informations internes :

a0 1f 02 00 6e b1 00 00 1c e9 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....n...........

c1 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 54 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........T.......

8e 44 33 04 00 00 00 00 5a b9 a8 16 00 00 00 00 .D3.....Z.......

c4 d6 28 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..(.............

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 38 96 a4 28 00 00 00 00 ........8..(....

99 9e 36 00 00 00 00 00 b0 3f 07 00 db a2 00 00 ..6......?......

00 00 00 00 00 c0 5f 52 02 00 00 00 87 0e 00 00 ......_R........



Windows a terminé la vérification de votre disque.

Veuillez patienter pendant le redémarrage de votre ordinateur.



******

and one for the real trouble while Norton was in use



Vérification du système de fichiers sur E:

Le type du système de fichiers est NTFS.

Le nom de volume est SEA_W98_D.





L'intégrité de l'un de vos disques doit être vérifiée.

Vous pouvez annuler cette vérification, mais son exécution est

fortement recommandée.

Windows va maintenant vérifier le disque.

La signature de l'en-tête multi-secteur pour le VCN 0x0 de l'index

$I30

dans le fichier 0x22a est incorrecte.

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................

Correction des erreurs dans l'index $I30 du fichier 554.

La bitmap d'index $I30 dans le fichier 0x22a est incorrecte.

Correction des erreurs dans l'index $I30 du fichier 554.

Le pointeur vers le bas de l'entrée d'index en cours avec la longueur

0x18 n'est pas valide.

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 ................

ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................

00 00 00 00 98 36 e4 10 3a 90 ca 01 ff ff ff ff .....6..:.......

Tri de l'index $I30 du fichier 554.

L'entrée d'index JETBFD5.tmp de l'index $I30 dans le fichier 0x4424

pointe sur un fichier non utilisé 0x19c.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index JETBFD5.tmp dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 17444.

La référence de fichier 0x780a00000000780a de l'entrée d'index

SYMEFA1.DB de l'index $I30

avec le parent 0x7809 n'est pas la même que 0x780f00000000780a.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index SYMEFA1.DB dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 30729.

L'entrée d'index LightningSand.CFD de l'index $I30 dans le fichier

0x7e75 pointe sur un fichier non utilisé 0x18e.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index LightningSand.CFD dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 32373.

L'entrée d'index LIGHTN~1.CFD de l'index $I30 dans le fichier 0x7e75

pointe sur un fichier non utilisé 0x18e.

Suppression de l'entrée d'index LIGHTN~1.CFD dans l'index $I30 du

fichier 32373.

Nettoyage en cours de petites incohérences sur le lecteur.

CHKDSK récupère les fichiers perdus.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A00370~1.MAN (400) dans le fichier

de répertoire 415.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0037005.manifest (400) dans le

fichier de répertoire 415.

Récupération du fichier orphelin A0037006.dll (405) dans le fichier

de répertoire 415.

Récupération du fichier orphelin UPDATE~1.INF (555) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin update_SP3QFE.inf (555) dans le

fichier de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin spcustom.dll (558) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin KB955759.CAT (559) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin update.exe (561) dans le fichier de

répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin updspapi.dll (562) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin update.ver (563) dans le fichier de

répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin updatebr.inf (564) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin eula.txt (565) dans le fichier de

répertoire 554.

Récupération du fichier orphelin branches.inf (566) dans le fichier

de répertoire 554.

L'entrée du flux de données de sécurité au décalage 0x2af0 ne tient

pas

dans la longueur restante, 0x168, d'une page. La valeur minimum est

0x220.



Réparation du segment d'enregistrement du fichier de sécurité.

Suppression d'une entrée d'index avec l'ID 331 à partir de l'index

$SII du fichier 9.

Suppression d'une entrée d'index avec l'ID 332 à partir de l'index

$SII du fichier 9.

Suppression d'une entrée d'index avec l'ID 333 à partir de l'index

$SII du fichier 9.

Suppression d'une entrée d'index avec l'ID 332 à partir de l'index

$SDH du fichier 9.

Suppression d'une entrée d'index avec l'ID 333 à partir de l'index

$SDH du fichier 9.

Remplacement de l'id de sécurité erroné par l'id de sécurité par

défaut pour le fichier 579.

Remplacement de l'id de sécurité erroné par l'id de sécurité par

défaut pour le fichier 584.

Remplacement de l'id de sécurité erroné par l'id de sécurité par

défaut pour le fichier 591.

Nettoyage en cours de 30 entrées d'index inutilisées à partir de

l'index $SII du fichier 9.

Nettoyage en cours de 30 entrées d'index inutilisées à partir de

l'index $SDH du fichier 9.

Nettoyage en cours de 30 descripteurs de sécurité non utilisés.

Bloc miroir descripteur de sécurité différent du

bloc maître descripteur de sécurité au décalage 0x0.

Réparation de la copie miroir de la chaîne de données des descripteurs

de sécurité.

CHKDSK vérifie le journal USN...

Vérification du journal USN terminée.

CHKDSK a découvert de l'espace libre marqué alloué dans la

bitmap de la table de fichiers maîtres (MFT).

Correction des erreurs dans le carte du volume.

Windows a effectué des corrections sur le système de fichiers.



41632415 Ko d'espace disque au total.

10840976 Ko dans 34810 fichiers.

10792 Ko dans 2460 index.

32 Ko dans des secteurs défectueux.

115683 Ko utilisés par le système.

65536 Ko occupés par le fichier journal.

30664932 Ko disponibles sur le disque.



4096 octets dans chaque unité d'allocation.

10408103 unités d'allocation au total sur le disque.

7666233 unités d'allocation disponibles sur le disque.



Informations internes :

40 b8 00 00 a2 91 00 00 5c bf 00 00 00 00 00 00 @.......\.......

31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1.......K.......

42 af d5 01 00 00 00 00 a0 c8 07 12 00 00 00 00 B...............

b2 e7 0e 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 de 9e e7 1d 00 00 00 00 ................

99 9e 36 00 00 00 00 00 f8 3f 07 00 fa 87 00 00 ..6......?......

00 00 00 00 00 40 ae 95 02 00 00 00 9c 09 00 00 .....@..........



Windows a terminé la vérification de votre disque.

Veuillez patienter pendant le redémarrage de votre ordinateur.





>> The problem ALWAYS occurs after shutdown, and the file seems to be

>> always 'temporary' or 'logging' type (Like Avguard.tmp last time)


>

>Describe what happens in detail, making sure you include the complete

>text of any messages you see.

>

>> I am not even considering going back to Norton yet (It is working fine

>> on a Notebook, a bit slow and too 'user do not need to know' for my

>> taste.

>>

>> I have yet to try Cccleaner (and a bit afraid to do it!)


>

>No need to be afraid of Cleaner as long as you avoid its Registry

>section. All it does is provide an effective way to delete temp files.

>If you don't want to use Cleaner, then you need to do the following:

>

>Start | All Programs | Accessories | System Tools | Disk Cleanup

>

>The only boxes you need checked are:

>

>Temporary Internet Files

>Temp Files

>

>(But I prefer the simplicity of Ccleanner. YMMV.)

>

>Final thought: It is unlikely, but there is a very slight possibility

>that *both* hard drives are bad. If you perform a Clean Install (and I

>do mean Clean), the errors should go away. If not, I'd have to say the

>new drive is also bad. Info on performing a Clean Install:

>

>http://michaelstevenstech.com/cleanxpinstall.html

>


OK, I agree that the second drive may also be bad, or worse, that the

mainboard controler might be defective. The only solution to this

would be to buy another....



As for the 'clean' install, I did it from scratch, using the original

CD.

>> Thanks for the help.


>

>YW.

>

>

>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:58:30 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:09 -0500, "Daave"

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:32:48 -0500, "Daave"

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Inline.

>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Well, I folloed your advice, killed Norton, and installed Avira.

>>>>>> Allright, now,

>>>>>> I am waiting to see what happens...

>>>>>

>>>>> I know it was hard for you to break away from Norton, but I think

>>>>> you did yourself a big favor in the long run. Glad to help. And

>>>>> happy computing!

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Too bad. I just had the same problem again, with a 'Avguard.tmp'

>>>> file corrupted (always this index $I30 ??) although I am not

>>>> certain that there was not a system freeze (unknown reason) before

>>>> shutdown.

>>>

>>> What exactly is the problem again? One of the problems with a thread

>>> this long is that it is easy to lose track of pertinent events. In

>>> your first post, you stated:

>>>

>>>> Second, every 5 or so reboot, I get weird 'Disk Errors'

>>>

>>> Is this your problem still? It would be helpful to give us the

>>> complete message and anything else that you deem pertinent.

>>>

>>> You did run the Norton removal tool, correct?

>>>

>>> Also, check the Event Viewer for errors.

>>>

>>> One thing you can try is running Ccleaner and then reboot.

>>>

>>> Also, these pages may have useful info:

>>>

>>> http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899

>>>

>>> http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685

>>>

>>>> I am waiting for more facts.

>>>

>>> Facts would be helpful, yes!

>>>

>>>> But I guess Norton was not really bad!

>>>

>>> You *could* always reinstall it. But since so many users have

>>> reported issues with Norton 360, I couldn't recommend doing this.

>>> Your call, of course. (I am aware that the *newest* version of

>>> Norton has received better reviews with regard to performance issues

>>> and conflicts.)

>>>

>>> If this problem never goes away, you might want to consider a Clean

>>> Install. Although it's time-consuming, sometimes it is the best

>>> course of action.


>
 
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo

wrote:



>On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:37:11 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>>JeanPaulo wrote:


>




Just a thought !



My first disk is divided into 4 partitions, XP system on the second

one, and all my data on the third.



I NEVER had any errors on the other three partitions !



Jean Paulo.
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo

> wrote:

>

>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:37:11 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> JeanPaulo wrote:


>>


>

> Just a thought !

>

> My first disk is divided into 4 partitions, XP system on the second

> one, and all my data on the third.

>

> I NEVER had any errors on the other three partitions !

>

> Jean Paulo.




How many disks do you have? And how does your original disk (the one you

replaced) enter the equation?



On your first disk, XP is apparently on E:. Do you also have another

instance of XP on C:?



Please tell us what is on every single partition you have. So far, all

you have said is that XP is on the "second partition" and data is on the

"third partition." What about the first and fourth partitions? What

about your other disks?



And looking at the other post, it really looks like you did not perform

a proper Clean Install.



Finally, when you say that you have "all [your] data on the third"

partition, is it possible you have installed programs to that partition

as well? (Although having a separate partition for data *only* is not a

bad idea, programs should always be on the same partition as the OS.)
 
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:59:36 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo

>> wrote:

>>

>>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:37:11 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>>

>>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>


>>

>> Just a thought !

>>

>> My first disk is divided into 4 partitions, XP system on the second

>> one, and all my data on the third.

>>

>> I NEVER had any errors on the other three partitions !

>>

>> Jean Paulo.


>

>How many disks do you have? And how does your original disk (the one you

>replaced) enter the equation?

>


I have two units, one 80 Go Seagate IDE, and a second 1To new Seagate

Sata. I wanted to put the XP system on the Sata, but was unable to

make it work, as my main board does not BIOS recognize Sata.

(Asus A7v8x)



The 'old bad' (Sight!) was a 160 Go Maxtor.



Seatools (Dos) does not see any problems, but (XP tool) does not

work at all (can't even read SMART data)



>On your first disk, XP is apparently on E:. Do you also have another

>instance of XP on C:?

>


NO, and no multiboot.



>Please tell us what is on every single partition you have. So far, all

>you have said is that XP is on the "second partition" and data is on the

>"third partition." What about the first and fourth partitions? What

>about your other disks?




C is just a small FAT partition usable with DOS stuff and the initial

boot



D is the first partition on the 1 To, and contains data (videos....)

and pictures (This is how the disk are recognized, 1 IDE, then 1 Sata)



E is the system disk and programms (and swap file) (80 Go)



F contains my datas (Access, Office, mails, VB, C), but no programs

except some VB homemade (also on the 80 Go)



G to J are data only disks on the 1To

>

>And looking at the other post, it really looks like you did not perform

>a proper Clean Install.

>


I started from a newly formatted partition, and re-installed

everything, starting from XP, then Norton, then all my usual programms

from the 'setup's files. The old XP system was on the discarded disk.



>Finally, when you say that you have "all [your] data on the third"

>partition, is it possible you have installed programs to that partition

>as well? (Although having a separate partition for data *only* is not a

>bad idea, programs should always be on the same partition as the OS.)

>




No. And my backups are usually only made for this partition.



And as I said, except after some freezing (my DVD player was freezing

XP in some instances, needing a 'hard' reboot), I never had any errors

on the 'data' disk, being the current one or the old 'bad' disk. (I am

fully convinced that it was not a disk problem)



Regards, Jean Paulo.
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:59:36 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:37:11 -0500, "Daave"

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>>

>>>

>>> Just a thought !

>>>

>>> My first disk is divided into 4 partitions, XP system on the second

>>> one, and all my data on the third.

>>>

>>> I NEVER had any errors on the other three partitions !

>>>

>>> Jean Paulo.


>>

>> How many disks do you have? And how does your original disk (the one

>> you replaced) enter the equation?

>>


> I have two units, one 80 Go Seagate IDE, and a second 1To new Seagate

> Sata. I wanted to put the XP system on the Sata, but was unable to

> make it work, as my main board does not BIOS recognize Sata.

> (Asus A7v8x)

>

> The 'old bad' (Sight!) was a 160 Go Maxtor.

>

> Seatools (Dos) does not see any problems, but (XP tool) does not

> work at all (can't even read SMART data)

>

>> On your first disk, XP is apparently on E:. Do you also have another

>> instance of XP on C:?

>>


> NO, and no multiboot.

>

>> Please tell us what is on every single partition you have. So far,

>> all you have said is that XP is on the "second partition" and data

>> is on the "third partition." What about the first and fourth

>> partitions? What about your other disks?


>

> C is just a small FAT partition usable with DOS stuff and the initial

> boot

>

> D is the first partition on the 1 To, and contains data (videos....)

> and pictures (This is how the disk are recognized, 1 IDE, then 1 Sata)

>

> E is the system disk and programms (and swap file) (80 Go)

>

> F contains my datas (Access, Office, mails, VB, C), but no programs

> except some VB homemade (also on the 80 Go)

>

> G to J are data only disks on the 1To

>>

>> And looking at the other post, it really looks like you did not

>> perform a proper Clean Install.

>>


> I started from a newly formatted partition, and re-installed

> everything, starting from XP, then Norton, then all my usual programms

> from the 'setup's files. The old XP system was on the discarded disk.

>

>> Finally, when you say that you have "all [your] data on the third"

>> partition, is it possible you have installed programs to that

>> partition as well? (Although having a separate partition for data

>> *only* is not a bad idea, programs should always be on the same

>> partition as the OS.)

>>


>

> No. And my backups are usually only made for this partition.

>

> And as I said, except after some freezing (my DVD player was freezing

> XP in some instances, needing a 'hard' reboot), I never had any errors

> on the 'data' disk, being the current one or the old 'bad' disk. (I am

> fully convinced that it was not a disk problem)

>

> Regards, Jean Paulo.




I don't think any of your hard drives are bad, either.



Disregard what I said earlier about it looking like you hadn't performed

a Clean Install. I had erroneously assumed you had performed a *second*

clean install, which of course would have meant there would not have

been any references to lightningsand.cfd.



Are you currently having any problems? That one issue with Avira might

have just been a hiccup. Did you happen to look at these pages?:



http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899



http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685
 
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:16:31 -0500, "Daave" wrote:



>JeanPaulo wrote:

>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:59:36 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>>

>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo




>

>I don't think any of your hard drives are bad, either.

>

>Disregard what I said earlier about it looking like you hadn't performed

>a Clean Install. I had erroneously assumed you had performed a *second*

>clean install, which of course would have meant there would not have

>been any references to lightningsand.cfd.

>

>Are you currently having any problems? That one issue with Avira might

>have just been a hiccup. Did you happen to look at these pages?:

>

>http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899

>

>http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685

>


Yes.

I agree that the latest crash may be accidental (as I said, it

followed a 'hard reboot' when the system freezed), and the avira file

could be corrupted because of that.



I am now waiting. As the problem occured irregularly, I will feel it

solved if it does not occurs again the next month....



So for now, thanks for your help, I will reopened a thread if

necessary.
 
JeanPaulo wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:16:31 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

>

>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:59:36 -0500, "Daave"

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> JeanPaulo wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:00:06 +0100, JeanPaulo


>

>>

>> I don't think any of your hard drives are bad, either.

>>

>> Disregard what I said earlier about it looking like you hadn't

>> performed a Clean Install. I had erroneously assumed you had

>> performed a *second* clean install, which of course would have meant

>> there would not have been any references to lightningsand.cfd.

>>

>> Are you currently having any problems? That one issue with Avira

>> might have just been a hiccup. Did you happen to look at these

>> pages?:

>>

>> http://forum.avira.com/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=791899

>>

>> http://forum.avira.de/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=784685

>>


> Yes.

> I agree that the latest crash may be accidental (as I said, it

> followed a 'hard reboot' when the system freezed), and the avira file

> could be corrupted because of that.

>

> I am now waiting. As the problem occured irregularly, I will feel it

> solved if it does not occurs again the next month....

>

> So for now, thanks for your help, I will reopened a thread if

> necessary.




YW. Good luck!
 
Back
Top