.NET Framework??

  • Thread starter Thread starter L.S.
  • Start date Start date
L

L.S.

Guest
WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.



This leads me to a question.

Why have the older version of .NET on a system?



I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have an

dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0, 3.5

so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.



thanks,



L.
 
All you need is .Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It has version 2,

verson 3 and version 3.5.







Forget about other downloads as they are not required.



hth





"L.S." wrote:

>

> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>

> This leads me to a question.

> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>

> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have an

> dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0, 3.5

> so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.

>

> thanks,

>

> L.
 
On 03 Feb 2010, "L.S." wrote in

microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:



> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?




You only need it if you have an application that requires it. If you

don't, go ahead and uninstall it. You can re-install it later if you

find that your application DOES need it.
 
"L.S." wrote in message

news:ONlyGPSpKHA.1544@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>

> This leads me to a question.

> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>

> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have

> an dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0,

> 3.0, 3.5 so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or

> 3.0...

> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.

>

> thanks,

>

> L.






Error message when you try to install the .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack

1 Update from the Windows Update site on a Windows XP-based computer:

"Updates were unable to be successfully installed"

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922377

--

Bruce Hagen

MS-MVP [Mail]

Imperial Beach, CA
 
"20100203" wrote in message

news:4B6A0138.C6520B37@20100203.NET...

> All you need is .Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It has version 2,

> verson 3 and version 3.5.

>

>

>

> Forget about other downloads as they are not required.

>

> hth






Baloney. No .NET Framework version supersedes another. They are all

separate programs.

--

Bruce Hagen

MS-MVP [Mail]

Imperial Beach, CA
 
There is no need to keep Net. Framework unless you have Apps that

depend on it. For example, I have a ATI Graphics Card that

uses a Catalyst Driver and Control Center that is dependent on Net.

Framework. So, feel free to Uninstall Net from the Add/Remove Program in

Control Panel.

"L.S." wrote in message

news:ONlyGPSpKHA.1544@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>

> This leads me to a question.

> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>

> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have

> an dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0,

> 3.5 so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.

>

> thanks,

>

> L.

>

>

>
 
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:54:09 -0600, "L.S." wrote:



> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>

> This leads me to a question.

> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>

> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have an

> dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0, 3.5

> so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.






Newer .net framework versions don't replace older ones. If you want to

run a program that needs an older one, you need it. If you don't, you

don't need it.



--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003

Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Now why did you omit the error message you included in your "Me, too!" reply

to someone else's thread? It was very important:



> The following updates were not installed:

> Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 Security Update for Windows

> 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, and

> Windows Server 2008 R2 (KB953297)




But in this thread you tell us that "[.NET Framework] 1.1 sp1...won't

install." Big difference!



Repost:



See the "How to obtain help" section of

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953297



For home users, no-charge support is available by calling 1-866-PCSAFETY

(and/or 1-866-234-6020 and/or 1-800-936-5700) in the United States and in

Canada or by contacting your local Microsoft subsidiary. There is no-charge

for support calls that are associated with security updates. When you call,

clearly state that your problem is related to a Security Update and cite the

update's KB number (e.g., KB953297).



Or you can...



Start a free Windows Update support incident request:

https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?gprid=6527



The Consumer Security Support home page & Microsoft Update Solution Center

also offer support options

https://consumersecuritysupport.microsoft.com/

http://support.microsoft.com/ph/6527#tab3



For more information about how to contact your local Microsoft subsidiary

for security update support issues, visit the International Support Web

site: http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx



For enterprise customers, support for security updates is available through

your usual support contacts.

--

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002





L.S. wrote:

> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>

> This leads me to a question.

> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>

> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have

> an

> dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0,

> 3.5

> so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.

>

> thanks,

>

> L.
 
Wanna bet? And what version of .NET Framework does WinXP depend upon?



Do I need still need older versions of the .NET Framework on my system after

installing .NET Framework 3.5 SP1?

http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2009/04/20/9557946.aspx



Rich Barry wrote:

> There is no need to keep Net. Framework unless you have Apps that

> depend on it. For example, I have a ATI Graphics Card that

> uses a Catalyst Driver and Control Center that is dependent on Net.

> Framework. So, feel free to Uninstall Net from the Add/Remove Program in

> Control Panel.
 
You haven't used .net Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It contains

everything from SP2 onwards.



Check your facts Mr Pig!







Bruce Hagen wrote:

>

> "20100203" wrote in message

> news:4B6A0138.C6520B37@20100203.NET...

> > All you need is .Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It has version 2,

> > verson 3 and version 3.5.

> >

> >

> >

> > Forget about other downloads as they are not required.

> >

> > hth


>

> Baloney. No .NET Framework version supersedes another. They are all

> separate programs.

> --

> Bruce Hagen

> MS-MVP [Mail]

> Imperial Beach, CA
 
I stand corrected.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959209



No, I haden't downloaded it yet. Of course this is a moot point in regards

to the OP's issue with .Net Framework 1.1.

--

Bruce Hagen

MS-MVP [Mail]

Imperial Beach, CA





"20100203" wrote in message

news:4B6A45EA.75EDBD1D@20100203.NET...

> You haven't used .net Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It contains

> everything from SP2 onwards.

>

> Check your facts Mr Pig!

>

>

>

> Bruce Hagen wrote:

>>

>> "20100203" wrote in message

>> news:4B6A0138.C6520B37@20100203.NET...

>> > All you need is .Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It has version 2,

>> > verson 3 and version 3.5.

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Forget about other downloads as they are not required.

>> >

>> > hth


>>

>> Baloney. No .NET Framework version supersedes another. They are all

>> separate programs.

>> --

>> Bruce Hagen

>> MS-MVP [Mail]

>> Imperial Beach, CA
 
Correction:



Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 is a full cumulative update

that contains many new features building incrementally upon .NET Framework

2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and includes cumulative servicing updates to the .NET

Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 3.0 subcomponents.



It /does not/ replace any version. It adds updates to earlier versions.



Source:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/959209



Back in the sty you go.

--

Bruce Hagen

MS-MVP [Mail]

Imperial Beach, CA





> "20100203" wrote in message

> news:4B6A45EA.75EDBD1D@20100203.NET...

>> You haven't used .net Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It contains

>> everything from SP2 onwards.

>>

>> Check your facts Mr Pig!

>>

>>

>>

>> Bruce Hagen wrote:

>>>

>>> "20100203" wrote in message

>>> news:4B6A0138.C6520B37@20100203.NET...

>>> > All you need is .Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It has version 2,

>>> > verson 3 and version 3.5.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Forget about other downloads as they are not required.

>>> >

>>> > hth

>>>

>>> Baloney. No .NET Framework version supersedes another. They are all

>>> separate programs.

>>> --

>>> Bruce Hagen

>>> MS-MVP [Mail]

>>> Imperial Beach, CA


>
 
Thanks to all for your help and suggestions.

I tried to respond last night from home system but the post hasn't shown

up!! Went into my "sent box" but never showed up here. Ah, OLE at it again.



L.





"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in message

news:OlRkBjSpKHA.3748@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Now why did you omit the error message you included in your "Me, too!"

> reply

> to someone else's thread? It was very important:

>

>> The following updates were not installed:

>> Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 Security Update for Windows

>> 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, and

>> Windows Server 2008 R2 (KB953297)


>

> But in this thread you tell us that "[.NET Framework] 1.1 sp1...won't

> install." Big difference!

>

> Repost:

>

> See the "How to obtain help" section of

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953297

>

> For home users, no-charge support is available by calling 1-866-PCSAFETY

> (and/or 1-866-234-6020 and/or 1-800-936-5700) in the United States and in

> Canada or by contacting your local Microsoft subsidiary. There is

> no-charge

> for support calls that are associated with security updates. When you

> call,

> clearly state that your problem is related to a Security Update and cite

> the

> update's KB number (e.g., KB953297).

>

> Or you can...

>

> Start a free Windows Update support incident request:

> https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?gprid=6527

>

> The Consumer Security Support home page & Microsoft Update Solution Center

> also offer support options

> https://consumersecuritysupport.microsoft.com/

> http://support.microsoft.com/ph/6527#tab3

>

> For more information about how to contact your local Microsoft subsidiary

> for security update support issues, visit the International Support Web

> site: http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx

>

> For enterprise customers, support for security updates is available

> through

> your usual support contacts.

> --

> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002

>

>

> L.S. wrote:

>> WinXP(home) sp3 and all updates except 1.1 sp1 which won't install.

>>

>> This leads me to a question.

>> Why have the older version of .NET on a system?

>>

>> I have 1.1, 1.1 Hotfix (kb928366), 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, on this system. I have

>> an

>> dup system, same MB, winxp(home), .etc., etc. and it only has 2.0, 3.0,

>> 3.5

>> so not sure why I need to keep 1.1 or for that matter 2.0 or 3.0...

>> I've read as much as I can relating to .net but can't find an answer.

>>

>> thanks,

>>

>> L.


>
 
"20100203" wrote in message

news:4B6A45EA.75EDBD1D@20100203.NET...

> You haven't used .net Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It contains

> everything from SP2 onwards.

>

> Check your facts Mr Pig!

>


It's amazing how ignorant, arrogant and STUPID sooo many of the kids are

today. Go back to your room jerk, then think about growing up!
 
someone watching wrote:

> "20100203" wrote in message

> news:4B6A45EA.75EDBD1D@20100203.NET...

>> You haven't used .net Net Framework Version 3.5 SP1. It contains

>> everything from SP2 onwards.

>>

>> Check your facts Mr Pig!

>>


> It's amazing how ignorant, arrogant and STUPID sooo many of the kids are

> today. Go back to your room jerk, then think about growing up!




Please don't feed the trolls. Thank you.
 
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:



> Please don't feed the trolls. Thank you.




Anyone correcting a "Member of the Geriatric Society" becomes a troll

from now onwards because Pig-Bear has decided.



Place this message on your screen to remind you regularly.
 
Back
Top