KB950749 breaks RDP on DMZ servers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn St. John
  • Start date Start date
G

Glenn St. John

Guest
We applied KB950749 to two Win 2003 std SP1 servers in our DMZ. After that
we could not RDP to them even though they showed listening on 3389.
Uninstalled the security update and now we can RDP to them no problem. Any
thoughts?
 
See the section "How to obtain help and support for this security update" at
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950749

Tip: Temporarily disable real-time protection by your anti-virus and/or
anti-spyware applications (e.g., CounterSpy, Spysweeper, Spybot, AVG
Anti-Spyware) and/or any third-party firewall (e.g., ZA) before attempting
to install the update(s). If you disable a third-party firewall, do NOT
connect to the internet without having the Windows Firewall enabled!

Start a free Windows Update support incident request:
https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?gprid=6527

Support for Windows Update:
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/wusupport

For home users, no-charge support is available by calling 1-866-PCSAFETY in
the United States and in Canada or by contacting your local Microsoft
subsidiary. There is no-charge for support calls that are associated with
security updates. When you call, clearly state that your problem is related
to a Security Update and cite the update's KB number (e.g., KB950749).

For more information about how to contact your local Microsoft subsidiary
for security update support issues, visit the International Support Web
site: http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx

For enterprise customers, support for security updates is available through
your usual support contacts.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
AumHa VSOP & Admin; DTS-L.net

Glenn St. John wrote:
> We applied KB950749 to two Win 2003 std SP1 servers in our DMZ. After
> that
> we could not RDP to them even though they showed listening on 3389.
> Uninstalled the security update and now we can RDP to them no problem.
> Any
> thoughts?
 
Back
Top